Qwert wrote:any news about adjustment,,, its February start, so this need to be work on all this, so that league start on time.
It's being worked on.
Moderator: Clan Directors
Qwert wrote:any news about adjustment,,, its February start, so this need to be work on all this, so that league start on time.
uckuki wrote:relegation/promotion is the only sensible way to go. that's what league system is for and it would make the
whole thing a whole lot better, instead of scrambling every year to reinvent the wheal. new clans have to work
bottom-up, earn their place. those who cancel or quit get reclassified as newcomers. if a clan quits or whatnot,
we just promote an extra clan - have same number of clans (at least in the 1sd and 2nd division) year in year out.
it's the simplest and easiest way. why start the process from scratch every year? it's ok to have minor changes from
year to year, but system has to stay the same. and frankly those clans who were in the premier league have earned
their spot. everything else is bullshit.
I tend to agree. However, the majority apparently doesn't.
Donelladan wrote:I tend to agree. However, the majority apparently doesn't.
I didnt notice the poll, did we vote? We shouldn't confuse majority of posters and majority of clan players.
I don't know what would be the result of a voting but it should be done imo.
This thread is not (yet) meant for discussion, only for voting. If this turns into a discussion thread it will be locked and nobody can vote anymore.
Foxglove wrote:I don't think a promotion/relegation system would work well for us (the clans in general).
There are the difficulties with the initial seeding, and those same difficulties will recur year after year. New (strong) clans form and established strong clans sometimes sit out years or withdraw mid-competition.
And to those people who would say "tough - if a clan doesn't play or withdraws then they start at the bottom" - it will ruin the spirit of the tiered leagues, I think, if we constantly have the lower tiers being trounced by experienced clans that have to start from the bottom (for whatever reason).
Bruceswar wrote:Foxglove wrote:I don't think a promotion/relegation system would work well for us (the clans in general).
There are the difficulties with the initial seeding, and those same difficulties will recur year after year. New (strong) clans form and established strong clans sometimes sit out years or withdraw mid-competition.
And to those people who would say "tough - if a clan doesn't play or withdraws then they start at the bottom" - it will ruin the spirit of the tiered leagues, I think, if we constantly have the lower tiers being trounced by experienced clans that have to start from the bottom (for whatever reason).
+1
iAmCaffeine wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Foxglove wrote:I don't think a promotion/relegation system would work well for us (the clans in general).
There are the difficulties with the initial seeding, and those same difficulties will recur year after year. New (strong) clans form and established strong clans sometimes sit out years or withdraw mid-competition.
And to those people who would say "tough - if a clan doesn't play or withdraws then they start at the bottom" - it will ruin the spirit of the tiered leagues, I think, if we constantly have the lower tiers being trounced by experienced clans that have to start from the bottom (for whatever reason).
+1
-1
Using the F400 basically solves this. Just look at ATL and ACE now.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Then, for the first time using a promotion/relegation system, base the rankings off the F400.
Lindax wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Then, for the first time using a promotion/relegation system, base the rankings off the F400.
That's how I would do it.
Lx
Foxglove wrote:Lindax wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Then, for the first time using a promotion/relegation system, base the rankings off the F400.
That's how I would do it.
Lx
It makes sense... for one year at a time. But what happens next year or the year after when new clans form or established clans sit out or withdraw? Aka, the position we are in now?
I'm not trying to cause trouble, btw. I just think that the situation we find ourselves in this year is not unique, so whatever system we adopt should ideally be flexible enough to account for changes in clan participation while keeping each tier/group/whatever competitive.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Then, for the first time using a promotion/relegation system, base the rankings off the F400.
Foxglove wrote:It makes sense... for one year at a time. But what happens next year or the year after when new clans form or established clans sit out or withdraw? Aka, the position we are in now?
I'm not trying to cause trouble, btw. :) I just think that the situation we find ourselves in this year is not unique, so whatever system we adopt should ideally be flexible enough to account for changes in clan participation while keeping each tier/group/whatever competitive.
uckuki wrote:I wanted to say a lot of things but I'll keep it somewhat cool.
how about we all just pretend that relegation/promotion system wasn't agreed to last season?
like it never happened
I say let top 5 clans get together and decide everything, and just notify us when they are done?
since it's their points/ranking and fun of playing what matters most, us lesser beings should just
step aside and stop bothering them. who's with me?
1 clan 1 vote? c'mon that's so 1960s.
that's my proposition: only top 5 clans have a say in how CL6 wheels out?
please vote
Leehar wrote:I admit one of my deepest reservations for the promotion/relegation system, specially for this next league, is that because of some clans not competing in the final cl5 leagues for myriad reasons, the competitiveness of the format as a whole would be severely diminished, as they'd inevitably need to come up from the bottom rung.
This means that at least 5 of the top 10 clans per the F400 (Tofu, Pack, TSM, ACE & ATL) would essentially start in the 3rd league, which needless to say ruins the format significantly. If it was a less significant portion of the top tier ineligible, perhaps we could have continued irregardless, but the sheer number of top clans not competing in cl5 yet potentially competing in cl6 would make a mockery of the format.
It is beyond doubt that the third league will be a complete wash, there may be a few surprises, but the large majority is likely to be blow-outs, which is unappealing for either party. With the yearly cycle and only the 2 being promoted, that state of events would continue for a couple of years & I wouldn't be surprised if both lower ranked & the aforementioned clans didn't compete because there would be little point in those battles. And with the yearly cycle and only the 2 being promoted.
The same could be said for the Premier League, because again the competitiveness decreases significantly without half of the top clans that belong there, at least on paper, which results in somewhat hollow victories. Perhaps some would prefer that outcome, but that may stem from the benefit to their clan, rather than for the league as a whole.
The current Qualifying Groups are at least an improvement on both the above possibilities, in that even if top & lower ranked clans compete, there is still the competitiveness factor of needing to ensure promotion into the respective leagues, while for the latter instance ensuring if those aforementioned clans don't qualify, the participation of others is based on merit rather than more intangible factors.
Leehar wrote:I'm somewhat surprised at the likes of TSM & Tofu's support of promotion/relegation, since I think the former has put it on record that their participation is subject to where they are placed, & the latter's past history(random league) also suggested that they would not compete.
friendly1 wrote:Has it been determined who will be responsible for CL6?
I think there are lots of questions and while I'm not looking for a specific organizer for the event I'd like to know who will be making the decisions surrounding rule changes or not, format changes or not, relegation/promotion rules, etc.
Apologies if this is explained elsewhere, TSM chose not to partake in CL5 so I'm curious what impact that will have on placement in CL6 (as that's quite likely going to factor into our decision to enter or not). Considering some heavy volume wars next year if we don't participate.
Not in any hurry with this, but figured it's better to start down this road with lots of time available to discuss. With the additional CD's I thought perhaps some areas may have been designated (can't see one CD being outright responsible for the entirety, but maybe that's the case)9
Thanks!
F1
Leehar wrote:Did they assume they'd just be placed in PL based on their standing alone?
WPBRJ wrote:I have to say without wanting any part of all of the discussion and with all the knowledge of actually running one of the clan leagues with by the way was the biggest year on record that there is no right answer to anything. No matter what any one person or in this case the CD’s no matter what is discussed no matter what is decided on there will be unhappy people. The harder any one tries to make it fair and everyone happy the more complex it gets and the more the majority will not like it. And most will not say anything about it ether.
I also have to say it is not as fun as it used to be! It’s so complex it just isn’t fun and I was always under the impression that we want to win but at the same time if we lose let’s hope we had fun. Year after year after year it gets more complex to make the few happy and most just want to play game and have fun.
I personally think we should go back to the basics like season 1 and 2 keep it simple! You win you advance you lose you go back. Top clans are always playing the top clans, your middle clans will always be playing middle clans and the lower end clans will always be playing against the clans they can compete with. Your clan drops out fine your out your out no getting back in your out. You’re out of all main events as well or anything that’s sanctioned by competitive clans. All competitive clans are in and it’s a requirement to be a completive clan just like the number 1 rule. You’re out you’re not recognized by the competitive clan world and your stripped out of everything f400 clan wars will not be recognized nothing. If we all stick together on this no one will drop out.
Then again I am sure no one really cares what I have to say and that’s fine I am okay with this. It’s just my thoughts and from past experience SIMPLE ID BETTER. Complex does not work and never will. It’s impossible to make every clan happy. It’s even more impossibly to make every player happy
The new clan i am in will play what ever you all come up with and try and do our best. I can go on forever but for now that’s all I have to say.
Just my 2 cents
WPBRJ
Users browsing this forum: No registered users