Page 1 of 4

[CC7] R4: FOED (25) vs FALL (30) - FALL Wins - Final 12/9/17

PostPosted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:43 pm
by JPlo64
Conquerors Cup VII Semi-Finals: FOED vs FALL

Image

CC7 Main Thread

Link To War Page

Contacts:
FOED 1st Contact: JPlo64
FOED 2nd Contact: Fyrdraca
FALL 1st Contact: IcePack
FALL 2nd Contact: aad0906

Schedule:
Sept 3, 2017 --- Start of 6 week period
Sept 10, 2017 --- Exchange Set 1. Away Invites by Sept 17
Oct 1, 2017 --- Exchange Set 2. Away Invites by Oct 8
Oct 15, 2017 --- All games must be filled


War Terms:
Round 4: 55 Games, including 1 Tie-Breaker Game:
27 Home Games Each
9 Doubles
9 Triples
9 Quads

Set 1: 5 Dubs, 4 Trips, 5 Quads
Set 2: 4 Dubs, 5 Trips, 4 Quads, Tiebreaker(created by FOED)

Rules:
show

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 7:42 am
by Conchobar
Let's go, Angels!
Time to put away the Babysham and West Coast Coolers and hit the hard stuff...
:twisted:
Image

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 4:16 pm
by rockfist
This should be an interesting one. FOED broke through a little bit, but can they break all the way through to the finals? Fallen tasted victory in CC5 before coming up just short in CC6, can they return for a third straight final? I would bet on Fallen to win 29-26 if I had to pick a score, but its certainly a close enough match that it could go either way.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:00 pm
by JPlo64
rockfist wrote:This should be an interesting one. FOED broke through a little bit, but can they break all the way through to the finals? Fallen tasted victory in CC5 before coming up just short in CC6, can they return for a third straight final?

Maybe they're a little over the hill??
Image Credit: Conchobar

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 8:04 pm
by IcePack
JPlo64 wrote:Conquerors Cup VII Semi-Finals: FOED vs FALL

Image

CC7 Main Thread

Contacts:
FOED 1st Contact: JPlo64
FOED 2nd Contact: Fyrdraca
FALL 1st Contact: IcePack
FALL 2nd Contact: aad0906

Schedule:
Sept 3, 2017 --- Start of 6 week period
Sept 10, 2017 --- Exchange Set 1. Away Invites by Sept 17
Oct 1, 2017 --- Exchange Set 2. Away Invites by Oct 8
Oct 15, 2017 --- All games must be filled


War Terms:
Round 4: 55 Games, including 1 Tie-Breaker Game:
27 Home Games Each
9 Doubles
9 Triples
9 Quads

Set 1: 5 Dubs, 4 Trips, 5 Quads
Set 2: 4 Dubs, 5 Trips, 4 Quads, Tiebreaker(created by FOED)

Rules:
show


Agree to these terms.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 05, 2017 11:05 pm
by rockfist
You are asking TOFU if Fallen are over the hill? Nope, but based on what I see neither are S&M, those guys are scary good, but so are either of your clans when you've got it going. It'll be fun to watch your match either as an interested party or merely for amusement.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2017 9:50 pm
by Fyrdraca
Excited to get these games rolling and hopefully take revenge on Ice for some of the beating he has handed me in other events recently.

;)

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 12:10 pm
by iAmCaffeine
FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 12:19 pm
by IcePack
iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.


Thankfully our "below average" is still better than some clans full strength 8-)

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 12:39 pm
by rockfist
I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 3:15 pm
by iAmCaffeine
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.


Thankfully our "below average" is still better than some clans full strength 8-)

Like who? KNT? Lol.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2017 7:00 pm
by rockfist
It's a meaningless pick up war...(which is why we don't play them).

Just a general comment, Egel seems to be on some sort of break lately. IMO Egel is one of the stronger players in Fallen so that can't help their performance. I say that as an outsider, but an outsider with more knowledge about Fallen than many other outsiders would have, as a result of having played in two finals against them and having to do game and team selection for one of those, as well as having to compete in league against them.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 2:12 pm
by JPlo64
First blood goes to FOED 8-)

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 5:45 pm
by IcePack
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.


Thankfully our "below average" is still better than some clans full strength 8-)

Like who? KNT? Lol.


Looking at the bracket we've gotten further in CC7 than you? Oh, and we've also made it to finals last two years so....theres that.
Where have you ended up?

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:38 pm
by iAmCaffeine
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.


Thankfully our "below average" is still better than some clans full strength 8-)

Like who? KNT? Lol.


Looking at the bracket we've gotten further in CC7 than you? Oh, and we've also made it to finals last two years so....theres that.
Where have you ended up?

Lmao I didn't make any comparison between our clans but I guess you want an e-peen measuring contest. It's cute that you're so rattled by me saying you under-performed when you lost to HH.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (0) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 6:43 pm
by IcePack
iAmCaffeine wrote:
IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

IcePack wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.


Thankfully our "below average" is still better than some clans full strength 8-)

Like who? KNT? Lol.


Looking at the bracket we've gotten further in CC7 than you? Oh, and we've also made it to finals last two years so....theres that.
Where have you ended up?

Lmao I didn't make any comparison between our clans but I guess you want an e-peen measuring contest. It's cute that you're so rattled by me saying you under-performed when you lost to HH.


Yep, rattled. :roll: Shaken to my core. :roll: You got me good bro... You didn't make a comparison about our clans, no. You just trash talked our clan again and expected no response. Sorry for your little butt.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Sun Sep 17, 2017 7:07 pm
by iAmCaffeine
Why would I not expect a response? I got plenty of response when I was trolling you lol. I didn't even trash talk your clan, I said you under-performed. It's literally a fact given the rankings. ATN has under-performed too. You're making something out of nothing lol.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 12:07 pm
by IcePack
All away invites are out (both sides) as of last night. Ready to rumble :ugeek:

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 3:26 pm
by GoranZ
JPlo64 wrote:First blood goes to FOED 8-)

I think CC killed us before you guys :D

iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.

This is how you console from ATN's failures :D

iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

Suddenly you are an expert in averages :lol:

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Mon Sep 18, 2017 8:19 pm
by iAmCaffeine
GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:FOED doing well lately. FALL doing below average. Hope that continues.

This is how you console from ATN's failures :D

Or an extremely easy bait :D

GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

Suddenly you are an expert in averages :lol:

Suddenly you forgot the word average can be used in different contexts :lol:

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 3:19 pm
by GoranZ
iAmCaffeine wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

Suddenly you are an expert in averages :lol:

Suddenly you forgot the word average can be used in different contexts :lol:

Great, are you an expert in a single one? No, exactly as I thought so.

Now get out of our war thread, you are making weird noise, something like whining, but much louder.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 5:58 pm
by iAmCaffeine
GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

Suddenly you are an expert in averages :lol:

Suddenly you forgot the word average can be used in different contexts :lol:

Great, are you an expert in a single one? No, exactly as I thought so.

Now get out of our war thread, you are making weird noise, something like whining, but much louder.

I like to be loud, it's more fun. You can't really reply to me and then say leave. Just tell me to leave without actually responding to my comment, or don't reply at all.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (3) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 6:07 pm
by IcePack
<<< Leave

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2017 8:54 pm
by Fyrdraca
iAmCaffeine wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
GoranZ wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:
rockfist wrote:I see Fallen competing for championships...don't understand how that is below average.

I think losing to HH is below average if you're FALL.

Suddenly you are an expert in averages :lol:

Suddenly you forgot the word average can be used in different contexts :lol:

Great, are you an expert in a single one? No, exactly as I thought so.

Now get out of our war thread, you are making weird noise, something like whining, but much louder.

I like to be loud, it's more fun. You can't really reply to me and then say leave. Just tell me to leave without actually responding to my comment, or don't reply at all.


You aren't supposed to having fun with other guys now Caff. Makes me jealous.

Re: [CC7] Round 4 : FOED (1) vs FALL (0) of 55

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2017 2:58 am
by iAmCaffeine
Fyrdraca wrote:You aren't supposed to having fun with other guys now Caff. Makes me jealous.

I don't think making fun out of other guys is the same as having fun with other guys. You got nothing to worry about.