Page 1 of 1

[MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

PostPosted: Thu Apr 27, 2017 3:21 pm
by MTIceman41
Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

Link to Clan War

show: Contacts

show: Start Date

show: Rules of Engagement

show: Maps Allowed

show: SandM Home Games

show: FOED Home Games

show: tiebreaker

show: SandM Player Count

show: FOED Player Count

show: Ranking Confirmation

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 3:34 am
by iAmCaffeine
You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:31 am
by MTIceman41
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:34 am
by IcePack
Wow S+M vs FOED in Round 1, tough draw but fun to watch!

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 1:51 pm
by iAmCaffeine
MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2017 11:02 pm
by MTIceman41
iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
iAmCaffeine wrote:You already look pretty enough to me, Iceman.


Why thank you!
Been six years last time I set on of these up...don't judge the edit totals :lol:

Early excuses for the 36-0 victory?

Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 7:24 am
by iAmCaffeine
I was just referencing your editing skills. FOED are good indeed.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 10:34 am
by JPlo64
MTIceman41 wrote:Great starting battle between S&M and FOED: GL everyone :D
CLICK ME

show: Contacts

show: Start Date

show: Rules of Engagement

show: Maps Allowed

show: SandM Home Games

show: FOED Home Games

show: tiebreaker

show: SandM Player Count

show: FOED Player Count

show: Ranking Confirmation


FOED Agrees

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Sun May 07, 2017 4:08 pm
by MTIceman41
Updated...S&M home maps created, sent out, and under link

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 8:47 pm
by MTIceman41
All games created and joined.
All player counts are within rules.
Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:

GL all, it will be a close one

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Wed May 10, 2017 8:51 pm
by IcePack
MTIceman41 wrote:Most common quote: Why are all the maps sunny? :lol:


I got this quite a bit on our set too lol

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (1) vs (0) FOED out of 21

PostPosted: Sun May 14, 2017 11:27 am
by MTIceman41
First blood: Game 17423063

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2017 2:05 am
by Conchobar
MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.


A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Sun May 28, 2017 7:21 pm
by MTIceman41
Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:Lost to FOED by 1 game when I was with MYTH 7yrs ago...they are good, should be very competitive.


A very different clan to 7 years ago. But our current form ain't too shabby either. ;)

This wee war is looking VERY close and could go either way. It is definitely squeeze your bum time... [-o<


Solid clan then, and solid now...hell no not another 1 game loss...

Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Mon May 29, 2017 2:23 am
by Conchobar
MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9


I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Tue May 30, 2017 11:14 pm
by Fyrdraca
Conchobar wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
Conchobar wrote:Actium/CM will be the deciders IMO...11-10 likely outcome...could be 12-9


I agree, 11-10 it will likely be. Personally, I'm not a fan of your unlimted games, but hopefully at least one will go our way... [-o<


While neither game is definitely over yet, we are going to need help from the dice to have chance in either. Honestly I think we played the Conquer Man game about as well as we could have going second. I'm sure we could have made some slightly better moves here and there, but I feel pretty good about our play.

As for Actium, ugh. I realized a round too late (which of course in unlimited is huge) that our strat wasn't the right one for the particular game settings. I will say that we did have some bad rolls at crucial times, but not enough to completely change the outcome. Going first however and having a sizable lead early on, if we lose I'm gonna stew on that for a while.

Regardless, I think we gave josko and company a tough fight in both games, and I'd be interested to hear their assessment of our competition.

Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (9) vs (8) FOED out of 21

PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 9:47 am
by iAmCaffeine
Looks like S&M will have this by 1 or 2 games depending on North America.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 12:57 pm
by JPlo64
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 1:18 pm
by MTIceman41
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Mon Jun 05, 2017 2:53 pm
by iAmCaffeine
MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.

Re: [MWC4] Rd 1: S&M (0) vs (0) FOED

PostPosted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 8:43 pm
by JPlo64
iAmCaffeine wrote:
MTIceman41 wrote:
JPlo64 wrote:
Fyrdraca wrote:Been a fun war, too bad it couldn't have happened in the finals. :D

It Still can.
Double Elimination ;)


Very possible...damn good battle and I expected this to be a close one

One of you will knock the other out of the loser's bracket in a couple rounds.

:lol:
(If you don't get it, look at the bracket ;) )

Re: [MWC4r] Rd 1: S&M (12) vs (9) FOED out of 21 S&M WINS

PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 11:02 am
by MTIceman41
All games completed 12-9 final score.

Re: [MWC4r]S&M (12) vs (9) FOED - S&M WINS - Final 6/18

PostPosted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 2:03 pm
by groovysmurf
Privileges removed, databases updated, topic moved.