Page 1 of 1

[MCII] HH vs FOED - 15-26 of 41 - FOED Win FINAL 11/27

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2016 11:29 am
by Keefie
MINI CUP II - 2ND ROUND

Image VS Image


LINK TO CLAN WAR

Contacts:

HH - Keefie
FOED - JPlo64

Set 1: 3 Dubs, 3 Trips, 4 Quads, 1 Tiebreaker Game (HH to make) Games to be made Sunday 25th September
Set 2: 3 Dubs, 4 Trips, 3 Quads - Games to be made Sunday 9th October

Each clan will pick the map and settings for exactly half of the games.

- Round limits are allowed.
- 6D+7T+7Q in home set each, with classic trips no spoils, chain, sunny as tiebreaker
- Only game types allowed are "Teams" (Polymorphic is not considered a team game)
- All games must have automatic initial troop deploy (no manual)
- All games must be sequential (no freestyle)
- All games must have 24 hour round length (no speed)
- All spoils are allowed.
- All forts are allowed except "no forts".
- Trench is permitted with no restriction.
- Each map (even random) can only be used twice per clan per clan war but can only be used once per game type (dubs/trips/quads).
- Beta maps are not allowed.
- New settings that are implemented after the start of the Cup will be excluded from wars.
- A player can participate in a maximum of 13 Games (tie-breaker doesn't count in this total).

FOG OF WAR RULE is in place.
HH and FOED agree to the fog of war rule.
12 hour Fog of War in effect. The rule does not apply to conquest maps or those games where the team going first just deploys/forts without attacks.
If the rule is broken, the offending team has to reveal what was conquered (if any) and those territories that would have been otherwise visible. if not remedied, the offended team can opt for remake before playing their next turn. If opting for remake, the offended team has to make time-stamped post request in the game chat to make it valid.

Both clans agree intentional "timing out" by any player in a game will not be allowed. If this occurs, both clan contacts will discuss and decide if 1) it was intentional & 2) a possible remedy. If there is no agreement, the matter will be referred to the TO for resolution and their decision will be final.

show: HH Set 1


show: FOED Set 1


show: HH Set 2


show: FOED Set 2


show: Tiebreaker

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 0-0 of 41

PostPosted: Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:04 pm
by JPlo64
FOED Agrees.
Have fun all!
show

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 0-4 of 41

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 6:00 am
by Keefie
Our second set games are made. Let's hope the beating we're getting eases up 8-[

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 0-4 of 41

PostPosted: Sun Oct 09, 2016 11:28 pm
by JPlo64
FOED set 2 games created, have fun! We sure are :)

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 3-6 of 41

PostPosted: Sat Oct 22, 2016 7:25 am
by IcePack
Reminder to post your games and winners/losers in the OP please.

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 3-6 of 41

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 3:56 am
by Conchobar
IcePack wrote:Reminder to post your games and winners/losers in the OP please.


You can borrow the one from the FOED forum if you like. ;)

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 3-9 of 41

PostPosted: Sun Oct 23, 2016 5:50 am
by Keefie
It's looking a bit one sided at the moment but HH have a few wins in the pipeline and the 2nd set is shaping up to be a lot more encouraging for us.

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 3-9 of 41

PostPosted: Tue Oct 25, 2016 3:51 am
by Conchobar
Keefie wrote:It's looking a bit one sided at the moment but HH have a few wins in the pipeline and the 2nd set is shaping up to be a lot more encouraging for us.


Yep, it is not at all as one sided as that score suggests. It will be very very close at half-time and we expect this to go to the wire...

Very well played so far, HH.

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 8-13 of 41

PostPosted: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:37 pm
by IcePack
Nice work by HH so far :) impressive

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 3-9 of 41

PostPosted: Thu Nov 03, 2016 12:39 pm
by Keefie
Conchobar wrote:
Keefie wrote:It's looking a bit one sided at the moment but HH have a few wins in the pipeline and the 2nd set is shaping up to be a lot more encouraging for us.


Yep, it is not at all as one sided as that score suggests. It will be very very close at half-time and we expect this to go to the wire...

Very well played so far, HH.


The trouble is, your wire is a lot closer than ours :lol:

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 3-9 of 41

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:02 am
by Conchobar
Keefie wrote:
Conchobar wrote:
Keefie wrote:It's looking a bit one sided at the moment but HH have a few wins in the pipeline and the 2nd set is shaping up to be a lot more encouraging for us.


Yep, it is not at all as one sided as that score suggests. It will be very very close at half-time and we expect this to go to the wire...

Very well played so far, HH.


The trouble is, your wire is a lot closer than ours :lol:


Well, okay. We managed to avoid a lot of butt clenching in the end and things now look much better.
Some very good games and battles but I'm now predicting it to come in at approximately 25-16...

Phew!!
Well fought folks. Not bad for a bunch of horses with no heads. :P

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 12-16 of 41

PostPosted: Fri Nov 04, 2016 12:39 pm
by Keefie
There are certainly three games that I thought would be ours that have turned.

I would have preferred 22-19, mind you last time we played we beat you 30-19 !!!!!


Well played guys =D> =D> =D>

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 12-16 of 41

PostPosted: Fri Nov 18, 2016 4:45 am
by Conchobar
Looks like 26-15 final score.

All good, tough and challenging games, guys. Great war, thanks a bunch. =D>
The very best of luck in MCIII, we won't be darkening your doorstep in that one... ;)

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 14-25 of 41

PostPosted: Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:51 am
by Keefie
Thanks guys and very well played =D> =D> =D>

Re: [MCII] HH vs FOED - 15-26 of 41 - FOED Win FINAL 11/27

PostPosted: Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:42 am
by Lindax
Privileges removed, databases updated, medals issued, topic moved.

Lx