Page 1 of 5
[MC1] TOP v FOED 23-18 of 41 - TOP Win FINAL 7/21
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 11:15 am
by PaulatPeace
MC 1
Round 1 Match:
TOP vs FOED
by PaulatPeace
War will begin May 8th, 2016
Set 1 begins May 8th
Set 2 begins May 22nd
TOP 1st Contact: PaulatPeace
Top 2nd Contact - narutoserigala
FOED 1st Contact: JPIo64
FOED 2nd contact:
Rules of Engagement:
41 Game War
Games types across the two sets as follows:
TOP & FOED:
Set 1: 3 Dubs, 3 Trips, 4 Quads, 1 Tiebreaker Game
Set 1: 3 Dubs, 4 Trips, 3 Quads
TOP will post Set 1 games first. FOED will post Set 2 games first.
Each clan will pick the map and settings for exactly half of the games.
Round limits are allowed.
-each war has 41 games played in 2 sets 2 weeks apart
-6D+7T+7Q in home set each with classic trips no spoils, chain, sunny as tiebreaker
Only game types allowed are "Teams" (Polymorphic is not considered a team game)
All games must have automatic initial troop deploy (no manual)
All games must be sequential (no freestyle)
All games must have 24 hour round length (no speed)
All spoils are allowed.
All forts are allowed except "no forts".
Trench is permitted with no restriction.
Each map (even random) can only be used twice per clan per clan war but can only be used once per game type (dubs/trips/quads).
Beta maps are not allowed.
New settings that are implemented after the start of the Cup will be excluded from wars.
A player can participate in a maximum of 13 Games (tie-breaker doesn't count in this total).
The12 Hour Fog Rule will be in effect: The rule does not apply to conquest maps or those games where the team going first just deploys/forts without attacks. if the rule is broken, the offending team has to reveal what was conquered (if any) and those terrs that would have been otherwise visible. if not remedied, the offended team can opt for remake before playing their next turn.
Bot Clans agree intentional "timing out" by any player in a game will not be allowed. If this occurs, both clan contacts will discuss and decide if 1) it was intentional & 2) a possible remedy. If there is no agreement, the matter will be referred to the TO for resolution and their decision will be final.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 12:38 pm
by betiko
wow! that's interesting.
I think top will win it.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 1:23 pm
by Keefie
betiko wrote:wow! that's interesting.
I think top will win it.
My prediction is 26-15 to TOP
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 2:19 pm
by IcePack
Keefie wrote:betiko wrote:wow! that's interesting.
I think top will win it.
My prediction is 26-15 to TOP
Based on TOP's wars and matches vs some of the higher finishers in SD,
I think it will be much closer than that. Though it'll be a good test against their
first Top 5 clan (first top 10 clan even).
I predict a good learning experience but FOED takes it, 22-19? Yeah, let's go w that.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 3:00 pm
by Donelladan
betiko wrote:wow! that's interesting.
I think top will win it.
What, never. FOED will take it. I am afraid of facing FOED next turn of the CC6, I think they could take us ( as they already did in the CL7).
Therefeore I think they'll win here. Except if they can't focus on here because they are busy with us on the CC6 maybe
hope it will be the other way around though.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 4:06 pm
by uckuki
FOED agrees
lets war
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 8:14 pm
by JPlo64
Keefie wrote:betiko wrote:wow! that's interesting.
I think top will win it.
My prediction is 26-15 to TOP
Wow, that's a pretty crazy prediction...
I think that TOP will find that FOED's history of excessive alcohol consumption makes us much less suitable for their typical farming strategeries
Have fun!
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:04 pm
by PaulatPeace
JPlo64 wrote:Keefie wrote:betiko wrote:wow! that's interesting.
I think top will win it.
My prediction is 26-15 to TOP
Wow, that's a pretty crazy prediction...
I think that TOP will find that FOED's history of excessive alcohol consumption makes us much less suitable for their typical farming strategeries
Have fun!
Ah yes.....I see the excessive alcohol consumption has already begun......or did it ever really stop?
Regarding our typical "farming" strategies.............we recently tried to "farm" TOFU, S&M, ACE and others. We would have reached higher..............but we were not able to challenge ourselves to a war!
Rather than speculate on the outcome..........we will show you up close and personal!
Enjoy,
Paul
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Thu Apr 28, 2016 9:28 pm
by JPlo64
PaulatPeace wrote:Ah yes.....I see the excessive alcohol consumption has already begun......or did it ever really stop?
Never stops... it's called Highly Functional Alcoholism
PaulatPeace wrote:Regarding our typical "farming" strategies.............we recently tried to "farm" TOFU, S&M, ACE and others. We would have reached higher..............but we were not able to challenge ourselves to a war!
If you're calling them out for not accepting a challenge to war vs you...
I remind you that I have extended multiple offers to battle vs YOU (
PaulatPeace) on Random maps that you have denied (*cough* chicken *cough*) ...
Offer still stands for you (or ANYONE) if you want to negotiate an EVEN match (not your LAME 5 game FARMING invite on Antartica poly-4)
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 12:59 am
by PaulatPeace
You are funny JP!
I will leave you to your drunken stupor!
Paul
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 2:15 am
by betiko
this is probably going to be a fun thread.
I sell popcorn (3$) and soda (4$). Just 50c to supersize your drink, 25c to supersize the pocorn.
can you guys start like... right now?
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 7:26 am
by Conchobar
Ah come on JP, that's a little harsh. Paula has only played Antarctica 2,017 times. I doubt if they'll use it in the war.
Can somebody order me a Beamish and a Jameson? I'll be at the bar in 15 minutes...
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:37 am
by RobbieDub
Shit like this always makes me nervous and then I need a drink and something to eat because I have to smoke to calm the nerves. So get me one of them sodas and popcorn betiko and I'll just grab my flask.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 10:39 am
by RobbieDub
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 12:26 pm
by BIG_John
Looks like we (TOP) will be farming a bunch of drunks in the first round!
Good luck FOED! Hope your not past out for the war! LOL!
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Fri Apr 29, 2016 11:57 pm
by JPlo64
OY... just came out of my hangover coma...
Time to start drinking again!
PaulatPeace wrote:You are funny JP!
I will leave you to your drunken stupor!
Paul
Thanks buddy!
I'd actually love to share a drink with you
But... you seem to me to be the type to be straight edge
and preaching righteousness
(while secretly molesting children )BIG_John wrote:Looks like we (TOP) will be farming a bunch of drunks in the first round!
Good luck FOED! Hope your not past out for the war! LOL!
Smart guy
Has the foresight to add "TOP" in parenthesis since he knows there is a high probability he will be scrambling to find a new home VERY shortly...
Love to all,
JPloatPeace
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2016 12:25 am
by ElricTheGreat
Crap are they vacuuming those poor birds up?
Does this machine remove the feathers and flash freeze them as well?
JPlo64 wrote:Love to all,
JPloatPeace
Enough already with all the "Peace" references ....
Oh and JP did you mention we would soon be seeing
TOPinPieces?
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2016 2:00 pm
by PaulatPeace
Hey guys,
You all are truly a funny bunch. I don't mind what has been referred to as "friendly banter. You may want to employ a little discretion and restraint in your funny remarks. You never know when someone may take offense at your sarcasm and references to child molestation! As long as you can take what you are dishing out, maybe we'll all be ok. I hope so.
You know....there is a fine line between self confidence and an over inflated ego. I think it can be safely said both FOED & TOP are quality clans that have the ability to do well in this competition against each other. FOED is by far the most experienced...but being that TOP is new to the clan world...many do not truly know what we are capable of.
I will continue to interpret your "friendly jabs" as just that...and may reciprocate with some of my own.
In the mean time......pour me a pitcher of Long Island Ice Tea and let's toast to a great competition!
Paul
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Sat Apr 30, 2016 2:43 pm
by Keefie
PaulatPeace wrote:
.many do not truly know what we are capable of.
Paul
I do, hence my prediction
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Mon May 02, 2016 11:19 pm
by JPlo64
Wanted to say, I may have went a little far in my last post... I apologize if the metaphor offended anyone.
Anyway, have fun TOP, it will be quite a fun and interesting battle!
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Tue May 03, 2016 10:59 am
by RobbieDub
WTF sober second thought!!! JP for shame...who do you think you are Mike Duffy!
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Tue May 03, 2016 1:18 pm
by iAmCaffeine
This is funny.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Tue May 03, 2016 1:48 pm
by betiko
it kind of feels like TOP is what pack was like back in 2011
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Tue May 03, 2016 2:10 pm
by Keefie
betiko wrote:it kind of feels like TOP is what pack was like back in 2011
with one BIG difference imho. TOP are better than Pack were back then.
Re: [MC1] TOP v FOED
Posted:
Tue May 03, 2016 2:24 pm
by IcePack
Keefie wrote:betiko wrote:it kind of feels like TOP is what pack was like back in 2011
with one BIG difference imho. TOP are better than Pack were back then.
I don't know if there's enough results / data to really justify that yet (besides maybe a gut feeling). There definitely isn't enough high ranked evidence yet, back then PACK convincingly defeated some top 10 talents (not just a small margin).
This FOED war will tell a lot, if it's a big win there might be an argument for it but if it's a tight war idk how that comparison could be substantiated. In CL7 SD PACK and TOP were pretty evenly matched based off the results (I know it's small batch and not full war) however, if they are equal to PACK or FOED now, I'm not sure the case can be made they are better than PACK at its peak.