FORMAT: The challenge will consist of 61 games: 20 quads, 20 trips, 20 dubs, and 1 trips tiebreaker on Classic map (no spoils, chained, sunny, no trench). Games will be sent out in 3 batches on 7/17, 7/31. & 8/14 with the following distribution:
Batch 1: Each clan will select 5 quads, 3 trips, & 2 dubs + the "tiebreaker" trips game;
Batch 2: Each clan will select 3 quads, 4 trips, & 3 dubs;
Batch 3: Each clan will select 2 quads, 3 trips, & 5 dubs
When games are sent, they must already be created and fully invited by the home team. chemefreak should be copied in the private message sending each clan's home games. Once home games are sent, home and away clans have 3 full days to fill the games.
GAME SETTINGS: Maps: All quenched maps, and the random map are allowed (no beta maps); Initial Troops: Automatic only (no manual); Play Order: Sequential only (no freestyle); Spoils: All spoils (escalating, flat rate, nuclear, and no spoils) allowed; Reinforcements: All reinforcements (chained, adjacent, unlimited) allowed; Special Gameplay: All special gameplay (fog of war and trench) allowed; Round Limits: All round limits (None, 20, 30, 50, and 100) allowed; and Round Length: 24 hours only (no speed games).
RESTRICTIONS:
12-hour Fog of War agreement (without penalty for violations) will be observed:
Each clan member may participate in a maximum of 20 games. (no forfeits when violated but the opposing team will get to pick any games that the offending player was in from the last batch played, equal to the number of games they went over the limit, to restart without that player participating).
Each map may only be chosen twice per clan and only once per game type (e.g., triples, quads); No limit on use of random map.
All trench games must be made with a 30-round limit; A maximum of 6 trench games may be created by each clan.
Players may not deliberately time out in nuclear and escalating games to avoid taking spoils. Violation of this rule will result in the remake of game in question unless wronged clan prefers the game stand.
This will be one to watch. Both clans seem to have done rather well, and both can win it.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 10:15 pm
by NoSurvivors
37-24 ID wins.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 7:25 am
by iAmCaffeine
ID 34 - 27.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 10:06 am
by Leehar
Low 32-29
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:16 pm
by Crazyirishman
LoW agrees to the terms.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:26 pm
by HardAttack
two strong clans to clash, interesting and exciting to watcha,
good luck
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Sun Jun 30, 2013 10:24 am
by 4 U 2 NV
Good luck to all! Should be a great battle
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Sat Jul 06, 2013 3:34 pm
by waseemalim
Alright chaps -- bring it on.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 2:22 am
by freakns
no clear favorite in this one... will be fun to watch
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:17 am
by Ishihara
freakns wrote:no clear favorite in this one...
gonna agree with this one... we're two pretty evenly matched clans... good luck everyone in LoW... let's get it on!!
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 1:16 pm
by Arama86n
With the vast amount of wars these days I find myself following less and less of them, but this should be an interesting one. Good luck both clans, keep it clean, have fun, and please.. don't get blood on the carpet.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:22 pm
by LEQUEEN
GL ID!, I promise do not cry if i lose a game ... but NOT 2
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 3:21 am
by matoc
in please
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 7:17 am
by Arama86n
matoc wrote:in please
Good one.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Wed Jul 17, 2013 2:41 pm
by LEQUEEN
Arama86n wrote:
matoc wrote:in please
Good one.
lol, dead funny
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61
Posted: Sat Jul 20, 2013 11:44 am
by maasman
Should be an exciting match up.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:20 pm
by Crazyirishman
Okay, it looks like all matches are under way... good luck all.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 0-0 of 61 [Starting Up]
Posted: Tue Jul 23, 2013 5:33 pm
by Ishihara
matoc wrote:in please
can we somehow get this a GA medal for outstanding commentary or something?
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 3-6 of 61
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 2:15 pm
by Arama86n
Update? Or have no games finished the last 12 days?
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 3-6 of 61
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 3:24 pm
by Crazyirishman
Arama86n wrote:Update? Or have no games finished the last 12 days?
We actually forgot that we were in the middle of a challenge, but it also appears that we're moving along quicker that a good number of the other challenges for this round, so there should be too much of a rush.
But I'm sure MudPuupy will get to it when he has the time, I have no room to talk since it took me about 7 years to update the thread when I was in charge of our last challenge.
On side note, this thread is on pace to shatter our previous challenge thread post count record of 27 posts.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 3-6 of 61
Posted: Wed Aug 21, 2013 8:29 pm
by MudPuppy
Sorry for the update delays. RL seems to be non-stop these days. I'll get some updating done tonight.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 3-6 of 61
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:07 am
by Hamanu
Arama86n wrote:Update? Or have no games finished the last 12 days?
Low 30 : ID 11 by our count
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 3-6 of 61
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 5:55 am
by Arama86n
Hamanu wrote:
Arama86n wrote:Update? Or have no games finished the last 12 days?
Low 30 : ID 11 by our count
Legendary I thought It would be closer.
Re: [CC4] ID vs LoW 3-6 of 61
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:32 am
by Hamanu
So did but we seem to be on a roll as a clan lately
Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 7:30 pm
Good one.
