1st Regiment (18) v. New Crusade (23) of 41 - Final (11/13)
Posted:
Mon Sep 19, 2011 12:53 pm
by General Brock II
The 1st Regiment of Foot Guards and The New Crusade have agreed to a war! The Field of Battle has been decided.
Rules:
1. Game Count: The War will be Divided into two Rounds.
6 Quads in Total (3 in Round 1 and 3 in Round 2)
7 Triples (3 in Round 1 and 4 in Round 2)
7 Doubles (4 in Round 1 and 3 in Round 2)
+ Random Triples Tiebreaker between Leaders only
2. A map can be played three times at home, but only twice per game format (ie. it can be played twice as a doubles; it can not be played again as a doubles thereafter, at home, but it can be played as one triples or one quads).
3. Banned Maps: Beta maps, Hive, Stalingrad, Conquerman, Doodle Earth
4. No Freestyle, Manual or Speed games.
5. Any games where a person deadbeats will be forfeited. Deadbeating is determined as, "The Intention miss of three consecutive turns and thus the elimination of a player from the game". If this occurs, then the remaining two teammates are ceded the third person's terrs, possibly tipping the balance in favour of the deadbeated players' team (particularly in Quads).
6. Other problem formulai will be resolved by discussion of the leaders of the two clans (General Brock and Dazza/SaxLad?)
7. The Tiebreaker is a triples fought among clan leaders. Neither team can call in "elite" players to fight out the last game. It has to be the genuine lead of the commanders! Random Triples:
1st Regiment: General Roy, mr. CD, General Brock II. TNC: BlackKnight_6, tokle and Dazza. Random, No spoils, Auto, Chained Triples.
8. Player limitations: 7 games each round, 14 total max for each player
9. No Round Limitation on all games
10. Nuclear is permitted
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:16 pm
by aaronvollrath
good luck to both clans! i am going to make a prediction that one of you will win; hopefully by december 2013.
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:26 pm
by dazza2008
Good luck 1 RFG hopefully this is another good war. I had a lot of fun in the last 1.
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Mon Sep 19, 2011 1:30 pm
by Ickyketseddie
Ahh a rematch!! Good luck guys, we're not the clan you may remeber tho!
It was fun last time! It was my first clan war infact, hopefully the result will swing our way this time!
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:19 pm
by QoH
I pick TNC in this one. They have come a long way since you're last war. I can't comment on you guys, since I haven't followed you as much.
Should be good though!
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 20, 2011 2:49 am
by Ickyketseddie
QoH wrote:I pick TNC in this one. They have come a long way since you're last war. I can't comment on you guys, since I haven't followed you as much.
Should be good though!
But how will they perform without you in the fold??
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 20, 2011 8:19 am
by General Brock II
aaronvollrath wrote:good luck to both clans! i am going to make a prediction that one of you will win; hopefully by december 2013.
HaHaha! Always a comedian, eh Aaron? ha ha, you have a valid point, though.
Though the 13th is pushing it... maybe the 12th?
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:26 am
by pretender77
1st blood for the crusade in the brit isles
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2011 6:40 am
by dazza2008
pretender77 wrote:1st blood for the crusade in the brit isles
Yup you should have put a good good dubs team together for that 1
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:57 am
by General Brock II
dazza2008 wrote:pretender77 wrote:1st blood for the crusade in the brit isles
Yup you should have put a good good dubs team together for that 1
HO! Marshall and Ian are going to smash you guys in the next game you play, for that remark. lol Thus far, they've been infallible... I don't think they ever played with flat rate before, though.. lol
There's a long way to go, so we aint concerned about the two lone wins that you'll obtain in Round 1.
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:10 am
by dazza2008
General Brock II wrote:dazza2008 wrote:pretender77 wrote:1st blood for the crusade in the brit isles
Yup you should have put a good good dubs team together for that 1
HO! Marshall and Ian are going to smash you guys in the next game you play, for that remark. lol Thus far, they've been infallible... I don't think they ever played with flat rate before, though.. lol
There's a long way to go, so we aint concerned about the two lone wins that you'll obtain in Round 1.
It was escalating and it was your home map. I was also joking. I have played alot of games with them 2 and they are good.
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:35 pm
by General Brock II
dazza2008 wrote:General Brock II wrote:dazza2008 wrote:pretender77 wrote:1st blood for the crusade in the brit isles
Yup you should have put a good good dubs team together for that 1
HO! Marshall and Ian are going to smash you guys in the next game you play, for that remark. lol Thus far, they've been infallible... I don't think they ever played with flat rate before, though.. lol
There's a long way to go, so we aint concerned about the two lone wins that you'll obtain in Round 1.
It was escalating and it was your home map. I was also joking. I have played alot of games with them 2 and they are good.
It was esc?! That explains the dilemma. It was supposed to be flat.
No wonder you two managed to squeak by in this game.
Re: 1st Regiment v. New Crusade
Posted:
Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:12 pm
by dazza2008
General Brock II wrote:dazza2008 wrote:General Brock II wrote:dazza2008 wrote:pretender77 wrote:1st blood for the crusade in the brit isles
Yup you should have put a good good dubs team together for that 1
HO! Marshall and Ian are going to smash you guys in the next game you play, for that remark. lol Thus far, they've been infallible... I don't think they ever played with flat rate before, though.. lol
There's a long way to go, so we aint concerned about the two lone wins that you'll obtain in Round 1.
It was escalating and it was your home map. I was also joking. I have played alot of games with them 2 and they are good.
It was esc?! That explains the dilemma. It was supposed to be flat.
No wonder you two managed to squeak by in this game.
There were only 2 sets cashed both by me. The first was 3 reds for 4 so it was like flat rate anyway then the second I had to cash but would have crushed the last weakling without it
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2011 4:59 am
by dazza2008
Are you setting up you quads?
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2011 8:59 am
by General Brock II
Yeah, thanks for the reminder.
I haven't heard back from my company commanders...
And we're waiting to annihilate you before launching a surprise attack.
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Wed Sep 28, 2011 9:31 am
by dazza2008
General Brock II wrote:Yeah, thanks for the reminder.
I haven't heard back from my company commanders...
And we're waiting to annihilate you before launching a surprise attack.
Surprise attacks? Yipeeeeee its our favourite
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:41 pm
by General Brock II
And unveiling our first war sig!
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:56 am
by General Brock II
Thanks, Pirlo! How's it feel to be an independent observer, again? lol
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:14 am
by Pirlo
General Brock II wrote:Thanks, Pirlo! How's it feel to be an independent observer, again? lol
it's my normal life to be independent
Re: 1st Regiment (0) v. New Crusade (1)
Posted:
Mon Oct 03, 2011 5:42 am
by ckyrias
General Brock II wrote:And unveiling our first war sig!
hahahahaah! we have to make one with a marine on horse getting kicked in jousting!!