rockfist wrote:If you beat TOP you'd get that chance regardless.
He made a new clan - ICON.
Moderator: Clan Directors
Donelladan wrote:How is the matter going to be handled ?
If TOFU has to play someone else, it should be decided quite fast ( like in a week or so ) imo.
Is it being discussed by the CD behind the scene ?
Should we open a topic/vote in CDF ?
I personally said I wouldn't mind to see LOW ( or any other clans that already has one defeat) to win the cup, if it is decided to pick someone else to face TOFU.
But I don't think it's meaningful to make TOFU plays another clan. It seems perfectly logical to me that if their opponent withdraw they go to the next round without having to fight anyone.
I am actually surprised we are questioning it.
josko.ri wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:Historically, when a clan has dropped out of a major tournament, their future opponents have been given a bye. Perhaps there is a better way to handle this, but I'm not convinced. Should there be any exceptions to the "single elimination" aspect of the tournament? I would argue that this is a larger question that concerns more clans than just TOFU and LOW. I think before we make changes to the tournament on the fly, and in a way that another clan might feel unfairly benefits a single clan with a second chance, we should open it up for a general discussion about how to handle such cases in the future. Clan League has a very explicit rule allowing clans to leave the event midway through. I think the only way to be fair to all the other clans in CC9 is to let existing results stand and open up alternative means of handling drop-outs in the CAT for a vote prior to CCX.
This is the first time ever someone dropped of CCup, so don't make a case that historically there were given byes when that have never happened.
Or do you recall that it happened? If so, when?
Lindax wrote:Donelladan wrote:How is the matter going to be handled ?
If TOFU has to play someone else, it should be decided quite fast ( like in a week or so ) imo.
Is it being discussed by the CD behind the scene ?
Should we open a topic/vote in CDF ?
I personally said I wouldn't mind to see LOW ( or any other clans that already has one defeat) to win the cup, if it is decided to pick someone else to face TOFU.
But I don't think it's meaningful to make TOFU plays another clan. It seems perfectly logical to me that if their opponent withdraw they go to the next round without having to fight anyone.
I am actually surprised we are questioning it.
As it stands right now, TOFU is in the next round. As I have stated before, as the TO I would not have a problem if another clan plays TOFU. In which case LOW is the logical candidate for me. It would not be obligatory though, or in other words, both clans would do that voluntarily. And yes, that decision would have to be made pretty soon.josko.ri wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:Historically, when a clan has dropped out of a major tournament, their future opponents have been given a bye. Perhaps there is a better way to handle this, but I'm not convinced. Should there be any exceptions to the "single elimination" aspect of the tournament? I would argue that this is a larger question that concerns more clans than just TOFU and LOW. I think before we make changes to the tournament on the fly, and in a way that another clan might feel unfairly benefits a single clan with a second chance, we should open it up for a general discussion about how to handle such cases in the future. Clan League has a very explicit rule allowing clans to leave the event midway through. I think the only way to be fair to all the other clans in CC9 is to let existing results stand and open up alternative means of handling drop-outs in the CAT for a vote prior to CCX.
This is the first time ever someone dropped of CCup, so don't make a case that historically there were given byes when that have never happened.
Or do you recall that it happened? If so, when?
I know for sure it happened in CC7 when TOP dropped out. Their opponent went on to the next round. I think that was PACK.
Lx
Donelladan wrote:But I don't think it's meaningful to make TOFU plays another clan. It seems perfectly logical to me that if their opponent withdraw they go to the next round without having to fight anyone.
I am actually surprised we are questioning it.
josko.ri wrote:Lindax wrote:Donelladan wrote:How is the matter going to be handled ?
If TOFU has to play someone else, it should be decided quite fast ( like in a week or so ) imo.
Is it being discussed by the CD behind the scene ?
Should we open a topic/vote in CDF ?
I personally said I wouldn't mind to see LOW ( or any other clans that already has one defeat) to win the cup, if it is decided to pick someone else to face TOFU.
But I don't think it's meaningful to make TOFU plays another clan. It seems perfectly logical to me that if their opponent withdraw they go to the next round without having to fight anyone.
I am actually surprised we are questioning it.
As it stands right now, TOFU is in the next round. As I have stated before, as the TO I would not have a problem if another clan plays TOFU. In which case LOW is the logical candidate for me. It would not be obligatory though, or in other words, both clans would do that voluntarily. And yes, that decision would have to be made pretty soon.josko.ri wrote:Doc_Brown wrote:Historically, when a clan has dropped out of a major tournament, their future opponents have been given a bye. Perhaps there is a better way to handle this, but I'm not convinced. Should there be any exceptions to the "single elimination" aspect of the tournament? I would argue that this is a larger question that concerns more clans than just TOFU and LOW. I think before we make changes to the tournament on the fly, and in a way that another clan might feel unfairly benefits a single clan with a second chance, we should open it up for a general discussion about how to handle such cases in the future. Clan League has a very explicit rule allowing clans to leave the event midway through. I think the only way to be fair to all the other clans in CC9 is to let existing results stand and open up alternative means of handling drop-outs in the CAT for a vote prior to CCX.
This is the first time ever someone dropped of CCup, so don't make a case that historically there were given byes when that have never happened.
Or do you recall that it happened? If so, when?
I know for sure it happened in CC7 when TOP dropped out. Their opponent went on to the next round. I think that was PACK.
Lx
When TOP dropped out it was round 1, so nothing else could have been done anyway.
Doc_Brown wrote:Donelladan wrote:But I don't think it's meaningful to make TOFU plays another clan. It seems perfectly logical to me that if their opponent withdraw they go to the next round without having to fight anyone.
I am actually surprised we are questioning it.
As far as I've seen, it's really only Josko questioning this.
Let me go ahead and put an end to this. TOFU declines to play a substitute in this round. We were notified more than a week ago that our war was canceled and we would be receiving a bye. At that time, we accelerated the schedule with A^ since our calendar was wide open. We're really not sure it sets a good precedent to give any clan a second chance in a single-elimination tournament, though we're more than happy to debate this for future CC tournaments in the CAT forum.
josko.ri wrote:Lindax wrote:Unfortunately SOH had to pull out of CC9.
This means that TOFU goes through to the next round.
Lx
Why SoH pulled out?
Can you give a wild card to quarterfinals instead of SoH, maybe reward the Clan who lost Round 16 match with the lowest margin?
Giving bye to TOFU seems as the worst possible solution IMO.
benga wrote:If you read carefully no one is willing to lead clan, organise stuff in essence work.
I can't vouch 100% but if I left OSA would fall apart too.
Caymanmew wrote:I got to say this is a shitty situation and i do feel bad for SoH but one thing that is bugging me here is that we have 16 active players from MM jumping from clan to clan. We are losing clans left and right and then we have a group like this...
16 players is 2 less then ATL and more then ATL had active 9 month ago. Easily enough to run a clan, recruit a few and you're in great shape.
OSA had 17 active, with these 19 they now have 36, that is insane, you can for sure make 2 clans from that....
Maybe it is time we start putting a limit on number of players clans can have, 25 seems more then enough to me...
Donelladan wrote:Seems to me a player cap for clans has been suggested many times already.
Maybe it is time to open an official discussion about it.
Lindax wrote:I see LHDD has won round 2. Don't know when this happened, but round 3 needs to start Sunday, May 19.
That is FALL vs LHDD
Lx
benga wrote:Sent message to Swifte to start preparing our war.
celliottii wrote:torres44cm wrote:Your spinning this whole thing, You guys didn't clearly communicate with me. and neither did the OTP crew on their intentions. I'm that last person to say you can't leave a clan, as every member has every right to leave, but the lack of reasonable timing on you guys part was part of the problem. below are my issues
I'm going to go through all of these one at a time. Unfortunately, I no longer have access to the SOH Forum, so I cannot post those quotes/topics. You can verify my statements on the SOH forum yourself. You can also go through the Facebook chats between you, Erik, and myself from January 19, 2019 through March 4, 2019, and you'll see Erik and I communicated clearly with you about CLX games and how little time we had to do these. I'm not going to paste these, as everyone has access to it already.
Steve, there is no spinning of the events or facts going on by us. There is no reason to have any more in depth conversations about this. I'm too busy with work and RL and we've gave you and SOH plenty of notice about our intentions.
Chuck & Erik
Users browsing this forum: No registered users