Moderator: Clan Directors
rockfist wrote:If you can predict escalating games that you aren't in you are better at prognosticating than I am. If they seem close I just call them even. I feel pretty good about a handful or so of the games I'm active in...less good about some and pretty pessimistic about a couple.
Fyrdraca wrote:rockfist wrote:If you can predict escalating games that you aren't in you are better at prognosticating than I am. If they seem close I just call them even. I feel pretty good about a handful or so of the games I'm active in...less good about some and pretty pessimistic about a couple.
The only escalating game I gave us as a strong lean was Rail euro quads. The other 5 were Hive, both Gallipolis, Span Arm dubs, and Pearl Harbor.
loutil wrote:Fyrdraca wrote:rockfist wrote:If you can predict escalating games that you aren't in you are better at prognosticating than I am. If they seem close I just call them even. I feel pretty good about a handful or so of the games I'm active in...less good about some and pretty pessimistic about a couple.
The only escalating game I gave us as a strong lean was Rail euro quads. The other 5 were Hive, both Gallipolis, Span Arm dubs, and Pearl Harbor.
Spanish Armada dubs is no longer a strong lean to you. Even to a slight lean for us.
Fyrdraca wrote:loutil wrote:Fyrdraca wrote:rockfist wrote:If you can predict escalating games that you aren't in you are better at prognosticating than I am. If they seem close I just call them even. I feel pretty good about a handful or so of the games I'm active in...less good about some and pretty pessimistic about a couple.
The only escalating game I gave us as a strong lean was Rail euro quads. The other 5 were Hive, both Gallipolis, Span Arm dubs, and Pearl Harbor.
Spanish Armada dubs is no longer a strong lean to you. Even to a slight lean for us.
Yes I had not got a chance to post that here.
Final score gonna be very close I think. Would be surprised if it doesn’t end up 29-26 or 28-27 to the victor. Been a fun war, lots of good games. And pretty solid luck (or lack thereof) to both sides in the games I’ve been in.
loutil wrote:Fyrdraca wrote:loutil wrote:Fyrdraca wrote:rockfist wrote:If you can predict escalating games that you aren't in you are better at prognosticating than I am. If they seem close I just call them even. I feel pretty good about a handful or so of the games I'm active in...less good about some and pretty pessimistic about a couple.
The only escalating game I gave us as a strong lean was Rail euro quads. The other 5 were Hive, both Gallipolis, Span Arm dubs, and Pearl Harbor.
Spanish Armada dubs is no longer a strong lean to you. Even to a slight lean for us.
Yes I had not got a chance to post that here.
Final score gonna be very close I think. Would be surprised if it doesn’t end up 29-26 or 28-27 to the victor. Been a fun war, lots of good games. And pretty solid luck (or lack thereof) to both sides in the games I’ve been in.
Our games together have certainly been (mostly) dice dominant both ways. We ran over you in District of Alaska and Pot Mosbi. You ran over us in New Zealand, Fractured China and Hive. Only our game on First Nations seems balanced.
Fyrdraca wrote:We can agree to disagree about Hive, but the point is well-taken. I should have said in my games there have been an equal amount of really lopsided games that were over fairly early on.
The only game (of mine) that was true card luck was FNNA trips, that one was frustrating.
Y’all had first turn and nice control of utilities in Mosbi, but we were set to still have a good shot to make some noise. But you stifled that with good strategy and a few nice rolls.
FNA quads has definitely been the most intriguing game I’ve been in. Could very well end up deciding the war.
MTIceman41 wrote:29-30 for foed it looks like; seems like it’s a classic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users