Pander88uk wrote:cpurcell wrote:What makes Hippie a far better player than pmc???
---C
What makes Nemesis a far better clan than FOED?
We have proven ourselves a lot more than you have
---C
Moderator: Clan Directors
Pander88uk wrote:cpurcell wrote:What makes Hippie a far better player than pmc???
---C
What makes Nemesis a far better clan than FOED?
cpurcell wrote:Pander88uk wrote:cpurcell wrote:What makes Hippie a far better player than pmc???
---C
What makes Nemesis a far better clan than FOED?
We have proven ourselves a lot more than you have
---C
pmchugh wrote:OK pander, I'll happily conceed hippy is a better player than me.
Good luck in the last few games.
Master Fenrir wrote:This thread has given me diarrhea, and not the good kind.
Master Fenrir wrote:This thread has given me diarrhea, and not the good kind.
danryan wrote:Oh sh*t a funny Aggie, what's next, a smart Sooner?
cpurcell wrote:I'd like to make a public apology for losing my cool. I just got very frustrated that Hippie was complaining about dice when we've been having troubles too, but have (for the most part until now) kept fairly silent about them.
Let's cool off and enjoy these last few intense games
---C
Silvanus wrote:perch is a North Korean agent to infiltrate south Korean girls
perchorin wrote:Wow, what's with FOED and the razor thin margins? Anyway I'm coming late to the party but these are two clans I'm a fan of so I'm glad to see it's close. I think FOED will pull this one out by a hair though, but it's just because they have more hair in odd places.
Leehar wrote:Nonetheless, I guess it wouldn't hurt to get some discussion going on a tiebreaker?
It looks to me that I'm in at least 3 games which kinda still hang in the balance, so nothings definite as of yet.
Anyway, now that things have cooled down a bit, I will gladly step up and claim the reward for spurring the last 4 pages of discussion after the preceding 6 having taken more than a month. /bow
*waits for his post to go down in flames
danryan wrote:Leehar wrote:Nonetheless, I guess it wouldn't hurt to get some discussion going on a tiebreaker?
It looks to me that I'm in at least 3 games which kinda still hang in the balance, so nothings definite as of yet.
Anyway, now that things have cooled down a bit, I will gladly step up and claim the reward for spurring the last 4 pages of discussion after the preceding 6 having taken more than a month. /bow
*waits for his post to go down in flames
Pete and I had already agreed a tiebreaker. Nice foresight huh?
I blame freakns for not posting more of his hilarious photos. They always seem to inspire greatness.
lordnex wrote:This is not part of a cup, no one advances anywhere, why would we need to break a tie?
danryan wrote:It's down to four games, Actium, Schloss, Senate, and Forbidden City. 34-32 for Nemesis right now. We have to win all 4 to win outright and 3 to tie. Nail biter.
pmchugh wrote:danryan wrote:It's down to four games, Actium, Schloss, Senate, and Forbidden City. 34-32 for Nemesis right now. We have to win all 4 to win outright and 3 to tie. Nail biter.
Yup senate goes to foed, meaning we have a one game lead with them three remaining.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users