Moderator: Clan Directors
ZaBeast wrote:yes the points would come in bursts but you could still have a good idea if a clan has been competitive over a long period or if all their points were slumped together.
Another way would be to give the score as a fraction (xx points/xx potential points) but I think that train has left the station because that would mean going over again to see who took part in the events.
IcePack wrote:betiko wrote:Honestly, I can hardly see how fall and foed could be better ranked than lhdd with all due respect to both clans... mostly foed.
I mean both fall and lhdd have won a cc cup and a premier division, but not foed... 3 cc finals for fall 1 win, 2 cc finals for lhdd 1 win, 1 cc final for foed no win.
Also, no clan has won as much diversity of clan events as we did, including every major and mid tier event involving 10+ clans.
What you did sounds like a lot of work, but not really sure how you chose your parameters. In my opinion, we should be #3 but I'm tooting my own flute
Not saying right or wrong but since lunch was boring at work, I did a better direct comparison (look at the tab “direct comparison”) this provides results based breakdown for the 3 clans mentioned (FALL/FOED/LHDD).
It provides better details. Looks like FALL has more success in the majors overall, FOED has lots more success in the minors than the other two, but LHDD has more high level success when it does score.
Again, lots of little interesting things show when broken down. Combined FOED has more scoring opportunities, FALL close behind, with LHDD last but again when you do score it’s very well.
Kinda meets the eye test, you guys have highs and lows that I mentioned. When you’re on it you are very hard to beat, but also your low points are lower than the other clans in comparison. FOEDs just produced lots of results over a sustained period, and FALL has kept up ok in most events but has more top 3’s and such in big events.
betiko wrote:well if your ranking takes "competition attendance" that much into consideration (for example, we dropped out of clan league twice so when we got back in it we had to start twice from second division, not that we actually got relegated by playing), well then how come some dead clans are so high? they've missed a lot.[/quite]
I don’t consider competition “attendance”, not sure if I said that or where you got that impression. Simply signing up for an event doesn’t earn points. Dead clans earn the points while their around and the points stay once they’re gone. So any points that are earned stay, not a decay or anything like that just an overall earnings report so to speak.
You note winning CL 2 Div, the way this is scored that hurts you. Weaker / smaller competitions don’t earn as many points as big events, or if more prone to luck might be slightly lower etc.betiko wrote:here is what all 3 have won:
LHDD:
1 conqueror's cup
1 clan league division 1
1 random league
1 random cup
1 clan league division 2
1 newcommer's cup
1 conquer clue
1 assassin clan challenge
FALL:
1 conqueror's cup
1 clan league division 1
1 poly challenge
FOED:
1 clan league division 1
2 random leagues
1 mini cup
1 1v1 challenge
Honestly, I wouldn't change our trophies with any of the other 2 clans
Again, I don’t just score titles. How many other top 2, 3, 4, 5, 8 etc finishes does each clan have? Those also get points. So you can win and get 10 points, but if you never do anything again you still might be below a clan who gets Top 4 every year and never won. And as I said, quality of competition, size of event, etc all those impacted how many points are given for various events.
So if it’s a bracket of 8 that draws weaker competition it’s not scored the same as something that draws 18-32 and every year the top 10 participates in etc.betiko wrote:overall win rates (wars; games):
LHDD: 75%; 57,7%
FALL: 70,3%; 55,2%
FOED: 65,6%; 55,4%
head to head matchups:
LHDD vs FALL: 2-1 (94-65)
LHDD vs FOED: 4-1 (151-118)
FALL vs FOED: 2-1 (77-68)
This isn’t really considered within my scores but interesting, which events did you include / exclude in this? But again, this is better left to F400 etc to score vs what I’m doing here.betiko wrote:Longest period of time holding the #1 spot.... don't know where to look for that for foed and fall. but we're there for a few more month for sure and holding it since 6 month
rockfist wrote:Perhaps there should be more of a drop off between places like F1?
betiko wrote:Seriously... you consider finishing 4 times 4th comparable to finishing 1st once?
At the end you only remember the winners. No one cares about 4th.
You can play with numbers all you want, lhdd has acheived more than fall as of right now.
betiko wrote:Longest period of time holding the #1 spot.... don't know where to look for that for foed and fall. but we're there for a few more month for sure and holding it since 6 month
betiko wrote:TLDR: it makes no sense that you could consider LHDD behind FALL and FOED and your criterias can be discussed
Donelladan wrote:betiko wrote:TLDR: it makes no sense that you could consider LHDD behind FALL and FOED and your criterias can be discussed
IcePack did not say that LHDD was behind FALL and FOED.
He defined some criteria and made a ranking out of it.
After calculation LHDD does appear behind FALL and FOED in this ranking. But it does not mean LHDD is behind FALL and FOED, nor that IcePack is thinking it.
It's just an interesting gathering of data/stats.
And yeah for sure we are losing points because we didn't join 1st DIV 2 years ago scoring 0, then had to join 2nd div, scoring 1 point.
That's why we're low here, but it doesn't mean much. It's just one ranking.
I think you're putting too much meaning into IcePack post. He was just sharing data.
Anyway, we'll win the Conquer Cup again this year, and for another 3 years in a row, then it'll be clear that we're the all time best![]()
rockfist wrote:In six wars contested we are 177-174 in games vs S&M and in five league seasons played against them we are 39-41. But (and this is a very important but) they have a significant edge in Cups and Leagues won so they are the best IMO, but yeah I do think its close. If you count the large penalty in CC1 its not as close though, but lets not go there.
Interestingly enough we have a losing record vs FOED (that we will reverse this year) between league and wars of 90-94.
iAmCaffeine wrote:full strength tofu beats full strength s&m (or kort) every day
Keefie wrote:The best FALL would beat the best LHDD.
Donelladan wrote:Keefie wrote:The best FALL would beat the best LHDD.
Is it just trolling or is it a serious comment ?
I would say the best FALL was when they won their CC cup title. That year we had a war that they won 31 to 30. I think 31 to 30 means that we were equal at the time.
When was FALL the best for you ?
rockfist wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:full strength tofu beats full strength s&m (or kort) every day
Easy for you to say...you don't have to play it...its an epic struggle every time, but that makes it fun.
Keefie wrote:The best FALL would beat the best LHDD.
iAmCaffeine wrote:Keefie wrote:The best FALL would beat the best LHDD.
doubt
Donelladan wrote:We were definitely not at our peak during the CL.
No one was focused on it in our clan. We joined the 1st div only not to lose our spot.
So I wouldn't say that you beating us 10-6 in the CL shine any light on who's the best.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users