IcePack wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Thread still going... Nice
I'm not sure the spam counts as still going..
yes it does
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
Moderator: Clan Directors
IcePack wrote:Bruceswar wrote:Thread still going... Nice
I'm not sure the spam counts as still going..
joecoolfrog wrote:I have been away a long time so cannot comment on current clans , in any case it is always difficult to compare old and new. What I can say is that THOTA absolutely set the clan benchmark and were unbeatable for a number of years , quite simply they were a collection of superstars , they had pretty much all the top players of the period. Would the likes of Blitz , David Wain , Big Whiskey , Big Yuma , Comic Boy and all the rest still be competitive these days , im guessing they would.
reptile wrote:Bruce you did a great job with your original post. As a someone who has been around clans since the beginning I think your list is the best.
However i think i would put THOTA #1, they always had a target on their back and everyone gunned for them and gave them their best shot and best teams. Some of the slightly newer clans that have emerged since THOTA's dominance were also great but if i could put the best of THOTA entire squad versus the best of any of the other clans since thens best squads i think i would have my $ on THOTA.
Trust me nobody hated them more than i did but they deserve the respect they had. They were the bulls of the 90's.
LOW may not be a top 5-10 clan right now but like you posted, in our prime we beat everyone not named THOTA. We played them in a couple of challenges which both came down to a 52% to 48% type of finish. In our prime i think we may have been closer to a 4 or 5 but great points have been made about the other clans you put in front of us.
I think it would be hard to make a top 10 list but i may as well throw one together. I am only putting
1 THOTA
2 KORT
3 LOW - I do this because when we were in our prime TOFU was part of LOW (so i can't put them ahead of LOW's prime members)
4 TSM - This clan was carried by Seul, not a complete clan, they just used seul to the max every war. One of the best players/not clan
5 TOFU
6 IA
7 ACE
8 EMP
I think these clans in their prime would be on the list close to this order. But you could mix and match any of the 3-5 spots in my opinion.
Left out 9 and 10 because In my opinion only these are the clans engraved in my CC history.
codeblue1018 wrote:reptile wrote:Bruce you did a great job with your original post. As a someone who has been around clans since the beginning I think your list is the best.
However i think i would put THOTA #1, they always had a target on their back and everyone gunned for them and gave them their best shot and best teams. Some of the slightly newer clans that have emerged since THOTA's dominance were also great but if i could put the best of THOTA entire squad versus the best of any of the other clans since thens best squads i think i would have my $ on THOTA.
Trust me nobody hated them more than i did but they deserve the respect they had. They were the bulls of the 90's.
LOW may not be a top 5-10 clan right now but like you posted, in our prime we beat everyone not named THOTA. We played them in a couple of challenges which both came down to a 52% to 48% type of finish. In our prime i think we may have been closer to a 4 or 5 but great points have been made about the other clans you put in front of us.
I think it would be hard to make a top 10 list but i may as well throw one together. I am only putting
1 THOTA
2 KORT
3 LOW - I do this because when we were in our prime TOFU was part of LOW (so i can't put them ahead of LOW's prime members)
4 TSM - This clan was carried by Seul, not a complete clan, they just used seul to the max every war. One of the best players/not clan
5 TOFU
6 IA
7 ACE
8 EMP
I think these clans in their prime would be on the list close to this order. But you could mix and match any of the 3-5 spots in my opinion.
Left out 9 and 10 because In my opinion only these are the clans engraved in my CC history.
Seul carried TSM? We had many key players in TSM; TSM was a very, very good and talented clan with or without Seul. We were in the mix in almost every war we were in; not sure what you based your analysis on. The best part of this clan was the atmosphere amongst the group; everyone was laid back and most importantly, we all had fun.
Donelladan wrote:I think he was mainly referring to reptile's post.
betiko wrote:Donelladan wrote:I think he was mainly referring to reptile's post.
Exactly, missquoted there. Reptile and all those that think the clan world only went downhill after they stopped playing. Some great players left but other great players were born
iAmCaffeine wrote:betiko wrote:Donelladan wrote:I think he was mainly referring to reptile's post.
Exactly, missquoted there. Reptile and all those that think the clan world only went downhill after they stopped playing. Some great players left but other great players were born
Ah fair enough. Personally I think comparing clans from then to now is pointless. Back then one of the most complicated maps would've been something like Waterloo, whilst now we have the likes of Spanish Armada, WWI Gallipoli and many more. The best players years ago dominated on more basic maps, whereas now it's much more about specialist maps. Some people would try to argue that being so good on the most basic maps is more impressive because it's so much more simple as a whole, but it's also impressive to find ways to outplay people on complicated maps. Not to mention strategy as a whole will have developed over the years. They were the best then, and others are the best now. It's impossible to make a fair comparison.
betiko wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:betiko wrote:Donelladan wrote:I think he was mainly referring to reptile's post.
Exactly, missquoted there. Reptile and all those that think the clan world only went downhill after they stopped playing. Some great players left but other great players were born
Ah fair enough. Personally I think comparing clans from then to now is pointless. Back then one of the most complicated maps would've been something like Waterloo, whilst now we have the likes of Spanish Armada, WWI Gallipoli and many more. The best players years ago dominated on more basic maps, whereas now it's much more about specialist maps. Some people would try to argue that being so good on the most basic maps is more impressive because it's so much more simple as a whole, but it's also impressive to find ways to outplay people on complicated maps. Not to mention strategy as a whole will have developed over the years. They were the best then, and others are the best now. It's impossible to make a fair comparison.
Pretty much. But putting top 10 clan rankings with tsm, ia, empire and even ace... and not even putting a clan such as fallen... and with tofu as number 5 behind tsm... you really have to be clueless and only remember things up to 2012 (even if ace didn t even exist yet in 2012 if i remember well).
I'd also like to know what clans such as tsm, ia, empire or ace have acheived compared to lhdd, foed and osa for example. These 3 clans might ve been mediocre in 2012 but they grew and acheived glories that the others never did.
iAmCaffeine wrote:betiko wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:betiko wrote:Donelladan wrote:I think he was mainly referring to reptile's post.
Exactly, missquoted there. Reptile and all those that think the clan world only went downhill after they stopped playing. Some great players left but other great players were born
Ah fair enough. Personally I think comparing clans from then to now is pointless. Back then one of the most complicated maps would've been something like Waterloo, whilst now we have the likes of Spanish Armada, WWI Gallipoli and many more. The best players years ago dominated on more basic maps, whereas now it's much more about specialist maps. Some people would try to argue that being so good on the most basic maps is more impressive because it's so much more simple as a whole, but it's also impressive to find ways to outplay people on complicated maps. Not to mention strategy as a whole will have developed over the years. They were the best then, and others are the best now. It's impossible to make a fair comparison.
Pretty much. But putting top 10 clan rankings with tsm, ia, empire and even ace... and not even putting a clan such as fallen... and with tofu as number 5 behind tsm... you really have to be clueless and only remember things up to 2012 (even if ace didn t even exist yet in 2012 if i remember well).
I'd also like to know what clans such as tsm, ia, empire or ace have acheived compared to lhdd, foed and osa for example. These 3 clans might ve been mediocre in 2012 but they grew and acheived glories that the others never did.
It's potentially a never-ending discussion at the end of the day. If you look at achievements then sure, LHDD, FALL etc. have more accolades to their names than perhaps the likes of TSM or ACE (not sure on this), but there are also a lot more events now than there were back then. Again it's not a fair comparison. On the other hand, it's easy to remember the highs of the former top clans which then leaves an exaggerated memory of how good they are. There is no sane argument to be had where TOFU isn't a top 3 all time clan. I think some of the names you mentioned are more debatable. OSA are a good clan but they've never been consistent for a long period of time. For ages I've considered S&M and TOFU the top 2, then LHDD, FOED and FALL fill out the top 5. I don't have any of them in a particular order. Since TOP came onto the scene though they've put a spanner in the works.
rockfist wrote:ACE had one second place in CL Premier Division, which isn't bad, but doesn't merit being ranked above LHDD, Fallen (who IMO should be #4), or FOED.
benga wrote:thota is overrated
Users browsing this forum: No registered users