Moderator: Community Team
plurple wrote:Swifte wrote:Interesting question - how would this mechanic work on team games. Would you take over a teammates' troops, or not? Could be an interesting twist either way.
i was thinking that they would yes
apey wrote:it wouldnt matter if you took over your team mates spoils (at least it shouldn't in theory)
betiko wrote:Sorry there is something i d like to be clarified; say you are green you trade sao paolo red 7 becomes green 7 or green 1?
This could be hell of crazy. It sounds fun but maybe it should be tried out in beta before? This sounds like a super hardcore nukes mode, with an effect twice as lethal. I think it could work!
koontz1973 wrote:
I really cannot think of a bad way to play this. Also, the last thing to support this is it would mean a brand new medal coming out.
koontz1973 wrote:plurple, you already got my support for this great idea.
Espionage spoilsI love this name over any other supported. Whilst the names or turncoat or traitor are nice, they would fit the player losing the troops more than you gaining them. Espionage spoils gives us the idea of the French Resistance in world war 2. A small band able to do far more damage than their size war warranted.
Espionage or spying involves a government or individual obtaining information considered secret or confidential without the permission of the holder of the information.
A turncoat is a person who shifts allegiance from one loyalty or ideal to another, betraying or deserting an original cause by switching to the opposing side or party.
koontz1973 wrote:Turncoat is OK, but sounds and is very old fashioned. Espionage, whilst the description above is correct, it is what the French resistance was up to as well as blowing up things. Espionage is best done when infiltrating the enemies ranks, it fits, and then later on you find dissidents that can help, followed by sabotage when needed.
koontz1973 wrote:Turncoat is OK, but sounds and is very old fashioned. Espionage, whilst the description above is correct, it is what the French resistance was up to as well as blowing up things. Espionage is best done when infiltrating the enemies ranks, it fits, and then later on you find dissidents that can help, followed by sabotage when needed.
When you cash in and only one troop is there, you end up getting to see what is around that region, even if you do not take full advantage of it by deploying troops there (spying), if you get a stack (turning dissidents), you can go on and attack (sabotage).
greenoaks wrote:koontz1973 wrote:Turncoat is OK, but sounds and is very old fashioned. Espionage, whilst the description above is correct, it is what the French resistance was up to as well as blowing up things. Espionage is best done when infiltrating the enemies ranks, it fits, and then later on you find dissidents that can help, followed by sabotage when needed.
When you cash in and only one troop is there, you end up getting to see what is around that region, even if you do not take full advantage of it by deploying troops there (spying), if you get a stack (turning dissidents), you can go on and attack (sabotage).
this suggestion is not for receiving a terit with 1 troop. you did not blow anything up. it is you get all armies there. in other words the troops turned their coats (of arms) from one lord to another (ie from Red to Green), hence Turncoat is more appropriate than a term which means spied upon.
i will take your word on thatbetiko wrote:"Spying" not spied upon, that would be "espionné". I think you can take my word on that one.
betiko wrote:But yes turncoat is much more apropriate.
greenoaks wrote:betiko wrote:But yes turncoat is much more apropriate.
and especially this one
plurple wrote:greenoaks wrote:betiko wrote:But yes turncoat is much more apropriate.
and especially this one
but this just makes me think that the spoils themselves will turncoat on you as the names normally describe what the spoil does not what it forces the territories to do. maybe i just don't like the word turncoat :shrug:
so are we now just arguing over what it should be called?
cashing spoils forces any territory you don't own to Turncoat. all troops on that terit are now yours. territories you possess are unaffected.
greenoaks wrote:plurple wrote:greenoaks wrote:betiko wrote:But yes turncoat is much more apropriate.
and especially this one
but this just makes me think that the spoils themselves will turncoat on you as the names normally describe what the spoil does not what it forces the territories to do. maybe i just don't like the word turncoat :shrug:
so are we now just arguing over what it should be called?
that works for me. Nukes nuke the terit to 1, Turncoat turns their coat to your colour. how's this?cashing spoils forces any territory you don't own to Turncoat. all troops on that terit are now yours. territories you possess are unaffected.
koontz1973 wrote:Some more options for a name as I am not a fan of turncoat, but lets not argue over a name. The idea itself is a great one and would make life a lot of fun.
defector, betrayer, deserter, judas, rebel, renegade, spy, treason.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users