Please make it 50 > 60, 60 > 70 etc. thanks
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Moderator: Community Team
dakky21 wrote:No answer? I see josko.ri won another medal for Monthly challenge but since he already has 50 medals there, he got a medal in a different section.
So why I didn't get a medal in General Contribution or somewhere because being in top 5 of drawn eggs?
CatchersMitt14 wrote:dakky21 wrote:No answer? I see josko.ri won another medal for Monthly challenge but since he already has 50 medals there, he got a medal in a different section.
So why I didn't get a medal in General Contribution or somewhere because being in top 5 of drawn eggs?
That is asinine. No other category spills into another. Either cap it or extend the limit for everyone.
CatchersMitt14 wrote:
apparently a number of GAs have been given for this reason. idk who set this precedent but it needs to be stopped and fixed. to date, if you've capped out in a medal category then you're added to a list in case the caps are ever increased, not awarded some other medal from another category.
josko.ri wrote:It is also funny how everyone is calling me dishonored behind my back but nobody of them dared to give me link to this thread so that I can defend myself. Very classy behaviour indeed
josko.ri wrote:It is also funny how everyone is calling me dishonored behind my back but nobody of them dared to give me link to this thread so that I can defend myself. Very classy behaviour indeed
IcePack wrote:To be clear - I’ve always thought the caps were stupid. I’m a big proponent of a medal earned should be given. However, consistently matters. Issuing medals for one person while not for others regardless of the level of work is wrong.
If they’re going to circumvent the cap this way for him, then all owed medals should be circumvented in the same manner
shoop76 wrote:IcePack wrote:To be clear - I’ve always thought the caps were stupid. I’m a big proponent of a medal earned should be given. However, consistently matters. Issuing medals for one person while not for others regardless of the level of work is wrong.
If they’re going to circumvent the cap this way for him, then all owed medals should be circumvented in the same manner
I agree that it is not right to make exceptions. Just crappy how it happened. Still curious though who approved it?
josko.ri wrote:For example, the most upper medal which you quoted, from the CC14 event, awards GA Medal for more than 10 Cakes and CA medal for more than 20 Cakes. I earned 44 Cakes. As I was CA medal capped, shouldn't then I earn the GA Medal because I satisfied the minimum requirement for the GA Medal of 10 Cakes?
I am also happy to announce that the new tournament medals should be in place now, for both "tournament achievement" (winning) and "tournament contribution" (organizing), as goes:
35=>300
36=>400
37=>500
38=>600
39=>700
40=>800
41=>900
42=>1000
43=>1200
44=>1400
45=>1600
46=>2000
47=>2500
48=>3000
The bar is set high, so better go out there and be the first to get them!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users