Conquer Club

Latest Update (see pg. 35 for full details):

Ending Poll Results:

European bonus?
3
9% [ 16 ]
4
47% [ 81 ]
5
35% [ 60 ]
6
8% [ 14 ]

Total Votes : 171

Original:

you can't use a website as image, use only the image please:

this is what you meant:

like this?

nice map it needs alot of work but it should be good

Jack0827 wrote:nice map it needs alot of work but it should be good

How so? Wade, ignore thus imposter and quench it.

i think that the continent bonuses shuld be more accurate; north america has more countries tan asian, and yet they both hav the same bonus. also, i think that there shuld be a bonus wenever u occupy all of the ocean ports. but other thanthat, sweet map!!

Yeah keep working on this, should be sweet.

IM sorry, but i dont like it at all. I get enough global warming every day from the news and websites, and i dont think we need a CC map adding to it.

ok, when i do this:


is the picture of the map coming up?

Not for me, no.

You want

Code: Select all

[img]http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8163/whitemap3jpegwe4.jpg[/img]

If this is global warming, shouldnt Antarctica be smaller? Not bigger, thats for sure.

I wanted to make this map. I just couldn’t find a good topographical map of the world to base it on. I even posted the ties in the ideas thread. So yeah I support this map:)

Great map - get started please

This map is a liberal conspiracy...

But I do agree that bonuses need to be adjusted:

N. America worth more
Antartica worth more

Also, I see there is one name to 2 countries in N. America

Guiscard wrote:This map is a liberal conspiracy...

lol

RobinJ wrote:But I do agree that bonuses need to be adjusted:

N. America worth more
Antartica worth more

Also, I see there is one name to 2 countries in N. America

Yea, Wade, you have Prairies spanning two countries; is it supposed to be like that?

yep, i know. i'll fix it

This map looks messy and confusing, and not different enough from the classic map to have any appeal whatsoever.

i really don't understand why most of europe is under water (including some mountains) but some small islands are still there

at the moment i don't like this map because it is highly innacurate. some high areas are underwater and other low ones still exist.

and second, i don't like the map because it has the same playability as classic map or world 2.1


PS: i really hate the red band across the map.

why is the antarctic so big? am i missing something about global warming ?

ok, i based this map on an elevation map and put all the green (lowest elevation) under water. and antarctica is a land mass, not like the polar ice caps of the north. the ice would melt off it, but the land would still be there

wrightfan123 wrote:

Guiscard wrote:This map is a liberal conspiracy...

lol

ya it is

Heres an example of a map of the future...



Maybe take some advice from that. Maybe it can help. Otherwise i love the map. great idea was thinking about it myself.

and to respond to DiM's comment, it has to deal with areas closet to the ice caps as well.