MrBenn wrote:Something like the mountains before you had would be fine, but with a little less uniformity - add some slight variance to the size and colouring of different mountains
Jolly good!! I'll get right on it!!
Moderator: Cartographers
MrBenn wrote:Something like the mountains before you had would be fine, but with a little less uniformity - add some slight variance to the size and colouring of different mountains
Industrial Helix wrote:Shouldn't Missippi be Mississippi?
And I really don't care to much about the mountains. The ones you had with the snow caps were fine.
porkenbeans wrote:Since you have gone so dark with the map, I think that you could now go with white text. You can eliminate the outer glow and just throw a drop shadow on it.
Gilligan wrote:Hm... Is it just me or is the small slightly hard to read?
Gilligan wrote:Hm... Is it just me or is the small slightly hard to read?
AndyDufresne wrote:**Wonders if a lighter smaller map would be more readable...** Okay okay, I'll stop pestering.
--Andy
cairnswk wrote:For me...all the terts are OK.
Abbreviations, and story each side of Florida are hazy with the blueish glow on both maps
Legend is OK.
I assume you've darkened the background but did you lighten the glow on the small text.
cairnswk wrote:Now i can read everything. Good work, but you lost the fractured lines affect.
fumandomuerte wrote:Got the feeling that the stars (capitals) are too big
isaiah40 wrote:fumandomuerte wrote:Got the feeling that the stars (capitals) are too big
They look big, but they are the same size as what is on the large map.
MrBenn wrote:There are going to be issues with trying to identify which territory name goes with which army number - particularly on the East Coast...
Some of the mountain ranges could be extended slightly to make it absolutely clear that
- Washington doesn't border Montana (add a mountain to the right edge)
- Idaho doesn't border Wyoming (add another to the top)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users