Moderator: Cartographers
random21 wrote:capitals 5 and 20. comes up as san francisco instead of sacranmento, and charleston instead of 33 columbia fort interstate bonus. unless i am mistaken
Foreverman wrote:Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.
Awoodness wrote:Foreverman wrote:Albert Lea cannot attack Des Moines but CAN attack Sioux City.
I didn't notice that, but I got Des Moines can not attack Albert Lea, but Albert Lea can attack Des Moines
greenoaks wrote:why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?
Gilligan wrote:greenoaks wrote:why does NYC not have a star like the other capitals?
NYC isn't the capital of New York. Albany is.
benga wrote:This map hurts my eyes too much, other big maps aren't that eye annoying.
JeopardyTempest wrote:Seems the army numbers for 38 (Augusta, GA) is left of where it should be, at least for me. At least in fog as ??.
JeopardyTempest wrote:Also, any thoughts on making Michigan +4 instead of +3? It's 8 territories, and 3 borders. Yes, it's low on borders, but seems like a throwaway territory right now. Though I could see some reasoning, I've found MN\WI to be a great opening move so far.
drunkmonkey wrote:I'm filing a C&A report right now. Its nice because they have a drop-down for "jefjef".
hotfire wrote:why is minneapolis where fargo should be...and why is duluth so far from lake superior...in fact why is there no lake superior?
joxter14 wrote:I'm just wondering why Anchorage airport is a 5 neutral when all the other airports are 2 neutral, unless they are a capitol as well? Alaska is the only state with 2 territories that are 5 neutral.
iancanton wrote:anchorage is currently starting with n5 neutrals instead of the intended n2.
random21 wrote:i noticed there are two buffalo on this map. new york and wyoming. could not 1 be changed?
leaving directions/notes can be misleading, unnecessarily
Users browsing this forum: No registered users