Gilligan wrote:you don't need the required tags.
this will make the file much bigger.
I'll knock this out when I get home and we can see how that works.
=D13=
Moderator: Cartographers
Gilligan wrote:you don't need the required tags.
this will make the file much bigger.
dolomite13 wrote:OK this xml should allow you to reinforce favored territories that you control.
I'm probably not going to add that to the key as it should just be a given... at least I feel like people will figure it out pretty quick.
=D13=
<territory>
<name>Treefolk</name>
<borders>
<border condition="No Basic Land">F1 - Caverns</border>
<border condition="No Basic Land">F2 - Crypts</border>
<border condition="No Basic Land">F3</border>
<border condition="No Basic Land">F4</border>
<border condition="Treefolk - F1 - Caverns">F1 - Caverns</border>
<border condition="Treefolk - F2 - Crypts">F2 - Crypts</border>
<border condition="Treefolk - F3">F3</border>
<border condition="Treefolk - F4">F4</border>
</borders>
<coordinates>
<smallx>36</smallx>
<smally>79</smally>
<largex>51</largex>
<largey>98</largey>
</coordinates>
<neutral>3</neutral>
<bonus>1</bonus>
</territory>
Gilligan wrote:dolomite,
I will propose this.
Leave the code the way it is. You can attack out only once. Lose the autodeploy to forget the lack of reinforcement. Or just leave the autodeploy for future turns if you don't have any land territories.
Then, we exclude nukes for this map. This way, you cannot lose your kingdom and just as important, your special features.
Gilligan wrote:so no matter how many territories you have, it's 3 deploy?
DearCyrus wrote:Any news?
DearCyrus wrote:Are we in a "no news is good news" kind of situation?
dolomite13 wrote:DearCyrus wrote:Are we in a "no news is good news" kind of situation?
I think Gilligan needs to upload this latest update to the beta server so he and I can give it a test yet. I was hoping he would get to it this past week but I haven't heard anything.
=D13=
dolomite13 wrote:XML - v3.0.5
SMALL - v3.0.5
http://imageshack.com/a/img513/3381/8451.png
Large - v3.0.5
http://imageshack.com/a/img850/231/nvqz.png
Users browsing this forum: No registered users