Conquer Club

Australia [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby DublinDoogey on Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:22 pm

Just for suggestion, I'm not sure where Ayer's rock (is that what it's called?) is, but is there a way you could use it as an impassable border possibly between the dark yellow and orange continents?

Unless, of course, those are the hard to hold continents
User avatar
Private DublinDoogey
 
Posts: 329
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 7:03 pm
Location: Wisconsin

Postby KEYOGI on Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:26 pm

I may be able to use. I'll see what happens with it.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby sfhbballnut on Fri Oct 27, 2006 10:32 pm

It's really starting to look like a playable map, nice job
Corporal sfhbballnut
 
Posts: 1687
Joined: Fri May 05, 2006 3:01 pm

Postby KEYOGI on Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:28 pm

Thanks mate.

Added territory bonuses which need to be commented on. Attempted to add Uluru/Ayers Rock to N.T., but couldn't get it to work.
Last edited by KEYOGI on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby hasaki on Sat Oct 28, 2006 12:18 am

To cut down on borders you can put in the rabbet proof fence there are three in total all in WA but I think you could put them where you want.


http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ae/Rabbit_proof_fence_in_Western_Australia.PNG
There can only be one. OK sometimes two or three.

Highest place- 35
Highest score- 2517
User avatar
Colonel hasaki
 
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Jul 17, 2006 8:48 pm
Location: 15 Hume drive,Arcadia,Ivalice

Postby KEYOGI on Sat Oct 28, 2006 1:06 am

Great idea hasaki, I'll see what I can do with that.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby happysadfun on Sat Oct 28, 2006 6:07 am

A rabbit-proof fence. Cool.
ImageChildren, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.

Rope. Tree. Hillary. Some assembly required.
User avatar
Cadet happysadfun
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin

Postby Marvaddin on Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:41 am

Yeah, Im sure that rabbit proof fence can also stop any armies :?
I dont know what is really sooooo realistic about this map. Comparing it to the first one you posted, the single thing that looks the same is the continents positions, because many many countries are now different... This is good, because we all can see you are interested in playability, but so you talk you will not make any major changes? Maybe you are going too fast, mate...

About the continents: (countries, borders, routes)
Western Australia (8, 5, 5). 5 borders are too much, I believe, but this is simple to solve, its only to remove Nullabor Plain border to Coober. Bonus of 5 at maximum. Hmmmm, "Great Victoria Desert"... what a great name, lol. Couldnt it be just Victoria Desert? Same to Sandy...

Queensland (8, 4, 6)... well, maybe you could move the connection to Western Australia to Brisbane and reduce a border here too, its an idea... by the way, the label "X to Y link" is not necessary, and its ugly too. Bonus of 5 too...

South Australia (5, 3, 5... or 4 if you remove Nullabor). Its playable, bonus of 3. But I just dont understand why you changed the real borders of the original map...

New South Wales (5, 4, 4). 4 borders in 5 countries isnt good, maybe one less border... You can think a better way to do it, Im sure. Bonus of 3.

N. Territory (4, 2, 6). Classic, bonus of 2

Victoria (4, 2, 4). Same, bonus of 2.

About the map playability:
It increased a lot... but its a bit strange... we have 3 groups of twin continents, lol. More important is to realize there are 2 big continents and 4 small ones, all connected... and Victoria is by far the most powerful area, since it can directly prevent other 2 small continents of being taken... and NT can be attacked from big continents, where people can possibly fortify and have bigger armies... beyond this, its a direct link from one big to the another one (maybe you can use better the original borders, making this different, and making the lake the fastest passage). In fact, I would try to decrease the power of Victoria a bit.
And only to confirm, you want a small Australia map, 36 countries, correct? Hmmm, maybe using a bigger size we could make some things different, you can think about it.

About visual:
I think you can remove the link label, and put the legend to the west, so we can avoid some wasted space... anyway, there will still be some space to something...
We can think about a different ocean, too, but its not really needed... but please try a different font, I dont like too much this one you are using... its very simple, it adds no appeal.
Image
User avatar
Major Marvaddin
 
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Postby KEYOGI on Sat Oct 28, 2006 4:15 pm

Marvaddin wrote:This is good, because we all can see you are interested in playability, but so you talk you will not make any major changes? Maybe you are going too fast, mate...


I'm happy with the changes, as most of the original territories are still there and I don't feel I've sacrificed the acuracy of the country to improve gameplay. My state borders are all still intact and to me that's the most important thing.

Anyway, thankyou for all your suggestions, I'll definately look at making some of those suggestios work.

And on the desert names, that's what they're called, so that's why I named them so. :D
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Kayla on Sat Oct 28, 2006 5:18 pm

maybe you two can work together on the other map to where you both like it. and then we only have one. i prefer the other one
User avatar
Major Kayla
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:43 am
Location: Sedalia Missouri

Postby KEYOGI on Sat Oct 28, 2006 7:14 pm

UPDATE

Thanks for the recent suggestions from everyone, I'm hoping this is near completion so I can get the code sorted and get this thing up on the site.


Changes that have been made:
- East coast to West coast link has been moved
- Nullabor Plain no longer borders SA
- Western Downs no longer borders NT
- Some additonal waterways


I'm hoping the impact of the changes will make SA and NT easier to defend against the might of WA and QLD


Continents and Bonus':
- Queensland - 8 territories - 3 bordering 6 - 5 bonus
- Western Australia - 8 territories - 4 bordering 5 - 5 bonus
- South Australia - 5 territories - 4 bordering 4 - 3 bonus
- New South Wales - 5 territories - 3 bordering 3 - 3 bonus
- Northern Territory - 4 territories - 2 bordering 5 - 2 bonus
- Victoria - 4 territories - 2 bordering 2 - 2 bonus
Last edited by KEYOGI on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Kayla on Sat Oct 28, 2006 9:27 pm

the bridges shouldn't be the same color as the river. the names of the countries shouldn't be the same color as the background of the continent and it would be easier to glance up to find a certain country if they were bolder and a different font.
User avatar
Major Kayla
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:43 am
Location: Sedalia Missouri

Postby KEYOGI on Sat Oct 28, 2006 10:12 pm

Kayla wrote:the bridges shouldn't be the same color as the river. the names of the countries shouldn't be the same color as the background of the continent and it would be easier to glance up to find a certain country if they were bolder and a different font.


The bridges are not the same colour as the river, they are the same as the territories, is that a problem?

As for the fonts, believe me, I've tried many options and found this to work best. They could be made a little bigger, but then I have the problem on territory names not fitting within their boundries, causing further confusion. The actual font itself, while not overly exciting, is easy to read.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Kayla on Sun Oct 29, 2006 2:36 am

the bridge would be the outside part, the lines, not the gap inbetween. it should be another color, the words arent that big of a problem though, just the color and font, maybe not the font, maybe just changing the color would help
User avatar
Major Kayla
 
Posts: 409
Joined: Wed Mar 01, 2006 2:43 am
Location: Sedalia Missouri

Postby KEYOGI on Sun Oct 29, 2006 3:19 am

Kayla wrote:the bridge would be the outside part, the lines, not the gap inbetween. it should be another color, the words arent that big of a problem though, just the color and font, maybe not the font, maybe just changing the color would help


The bridges are black, with the rivers being dark blue, maybe I'll lighten the colour of the rivers a little. Again, I can tell the difference on my monitor but I will make some adjustment in my next fix.

The only other font colour option I have is white, but I found it could possibly be confusing where there are a number of small territories together, such as Adelaide, Grampians and Mt. Gambier. Having corresponding font colours and territories I feel makes it easy to quickly identify which territory belongs within which state/continent.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby strike wolf on Sun Oct 29, 2006 12:30 pm

The small bridges are hard to tell.
User avatar
Cadet strike wolf
 
Posts: 8345
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 11:03 pm
Location: Sandy Springs, GA (just north of Atlanta)

Postby Marvaddin on Sun Oct 29, 2006 1:18 pm

Again, I think you should consider to change Tennant Creek and Alice Springs border to a north-south oriented one. And looks like Victoria is even stronger in this version :?

The map is beautiful... but those "mountains" seem made in Paint... they are terrible! And I like background pictures like those, but they are so dark that they are almost invisible... and where is a Kangoroo, or a Koala?

Maybe you can add some land to Camberra, and mainly Melbourne... these territories are tiny, they will look bad with 2 numbers. About the "Great" names, I would remove the "Great" or they will make the drop box where you choose names too "Great", lol.
Image
User avatar
Major Marvaddin
 
Posts: 2545
Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 5:06 pm
Location: Belo Horizonte, Brazil

Postby happysadfun on Sun Oct 29, 2006 5:55 pm

34 countries. Add NZ to jack it up to 38. Split Hobart, and if you decide not to switch it at least call it tasmania.
ImageChildren, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.

Rope. Tree. Hillary. Some assembly required.
User avatar
Cadet happysadfun
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin

Postby KEYOGI on Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:28 pm

Marvaddin wrote:Again, I think you should consider to change Tennant Creek and Alice Springs border to a north-south oriented one. And looks like Victoria is even stronger in this version :?


If I do that, it creates choke points, it's the reason it was changed.


happysadfun wrote:34 countries. Add NZ to jack it up to 38. Split Hobart, and if you decide not to switch it at least call it tasmania.


I can't add NZ, there is simply not enough room and if I split Tassie there'll be no room for numbers on the state. The reason I called it Hobart was because there is a Canberra territory and not an ACT. I think the best thing to do is to rename the Continent Victoria and Tasmania.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby happysadfun on Sun Oct 29, 2006 6:35 pm

You could make it closer than it is.
ImageChildren, this is what happens to hockey players, druggies, and Hillary Clinton.

Rope. Tree. Hillary. Some assembly required.
User avatar
Cadet happysadfun
 
Posts: 1251
Joined: Mon Jul 10, 2006 9:06 pm
Location: Haundin at DotSco, Being Sad that Mark Green Lost in Suburban Wisconsin

Postby KEYOGI on Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:03 am

I've adjusted the rivers, mountains and background to suit peoples requests. I now feel the background is probably too dominant though. My main aim of introducing the pictures was to break up the background so it didn't look so bland. I don't think it should distract from the map itself. Comments?
Last edited by KEYOGI on Wed Dec 27, 2006 9:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby Spockers on Mon Oct 30, 2006 1:19 am

I think the BG is too dominant, as you say.

You had it spot on in your previous update
User avatar
Private 1st Class Spockers
 
Posts: 390
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 11:11 pm

Postby gavin_sidhu on Mon Oct 30, 2006 2:37 am

KEYOGI wrote:
happysadfun wrote:34 countries. Add NZ to jack it up to 38. Split Hobart, and if you decide not to switch it at least call it tasmania.


I can't add NZ, there is simply not enough room and if I split Tassie there'll be no room for numbers on the state. The reason I called it Hobart was because there is a Canberra territory and not an ACT. I think the best thing to do is to rename the Continent Victoria and Tasmania.
If u removed the impassable borders to somewhere else in the map (like where the Australian bight is) you could easily fit it without too much fiddling around.
Highest Score: 1843 Ranking (Australians): 3
User avatar
Lieutenant gavin_sidhu
 
Posts: 1428
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 6:16 am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Postby KEYOGI on Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:24 am

happysadfun wrote:34 countries. Add NZ to jack it up to 38. Split Hobart, and if you decide not to switch it at least call it tasmania.


I don't see what the problem is. The Ireland map has less territories. With 34, a 6 player game has people starting with 5 troops and 4 nuetral. 38 makes 6 starting, 2 nuetral. What does it matter?
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

Postby KEYOGI on Mon Oct 30, 2006 3:25 am

What I really need is comments on the bonus troops for holding continents.
Sergeant 1st Class KEYOGI
 
Posts: 1632
Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 6:09 am

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users