Moderator: Cartographers
tokle wrote:Looks interesting, but I have a request;
The title; could you write it out properly, in Cyrillic?
Since it's already in Russian, and sort of semi-cyrillic letters, it wouldn't take much to it properly.
To those of us who understand it, it just looks horrible like that.
And to those of us who don't understand it, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway, would it?
I understand the faux-cyrillic you are doing at the bottom, though, but not in the title line.
nolefan5311 wrote:Also, cairns, can you post in the thread or PM me what the continent names should be for the XML? As is, I have no idea, lol.
cairnswk wrote:tokle wrote:Looks interesting, but I have a request;
The title; could you write it out properly, in Cyrillic?
Since it's already in Russian, and sort of semi-cyrillic letters, it wouldn't take much to it properly.
To those of us who understand it, it just looks horrible like that.
And to those of us who don't understand it, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway, would it?
I understand the faux-cyrillic you are doing at the bottom, though, but not in the title line.
You want this...tokle?
москва-Сити
cairnswk wrote:nolefan5311 wrote:Also, cairns, can you post in the thread or PM me what the continent names should be for the XML? As is, I have no idea, lol.
Sure, but when the gameplay is sorted out, as we are still sorting continents and impassables.
tokle wrote:cairnswk wrote:tokle wrote:Looks interesting, but I have a request;
The title; could you write it out properly, in Cyrillic?
Since it's already in Russian, and sort of semi-cyrillic letters, it wouldn't take much to it properly.
To those of us who understand it, it just looks horrible like that.
And to those of us who don't understand it, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway, would it?
I understand the faux-cyrillic you are doing at the bottom, though, but not in the title line.
You want this...tokle?
москва-Сити
thanks for taking me seriously.
cairnswk wrote:tokle wrote:cairnswk wrote:tokle wrote:Looks interesting, but I have a request;
The title; could you write it out properly, in Cyrillic?
Since it's already in Russian, and sort of semi-cyrillic letters, it wouldn't take much to it properly.
To those of us who understand it, it just looks horrible like that.
And to those of us who don't understand it, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway, would it?
I understand the faux-cyrillic you are doing at the bottom, though, but not in the title line.
You want this...tokle?
москва-Сити
thanks for taking me seriously.
Sorry, but your answer tells me nothing...i cannot read yes or no from that.
If no, please put up what you want.
tokle wrote:cairnswk wrote:tokle wrote:cairnswk wrote:tokle wrote:Looks interesting, but I have a request;
The title; could you write it out properly, in Cyrillic?
Since it's already in Russian, and sort of semi-cyrillic letters, it wouldn't take much to it properly.
To those of us who understand it, it just looks horrible like that.
And to those of us who don't understand it, it wouldn't make much of a difference anyway, would it?
I understand the faux-cyrillic you are doing at the bottom, though, but not in the title line.
You want this...tokle?
москва-Сити
thanks for taking me seriously.
Sorry, but your answer tells me nothing...i cannot read yes or no from that.
If no, please put up what you want.
How about just Mосква?
nolefan5311 wrote:Also, cairns, can you post in the thread or PM me what the continent names should be for the XML? As is, I have no idea, lol.
koontz1973 wrote:Just thought I would pop in and see. Here is a short list for you to look at but I am sure you already know these.
This is the area that I thought was great and needed copying all around.
Yes, and i had already changed that in the Outer Khamovniki territory and asked for feedback a couple of posts back.
nolefan5311 wrote:Ok, I reran the bonus spreadsheets and a couple of potential issues
The +2 in the 2 region bonus in the SW corner...adding that impassable between Gagarinsky and Ochakovo put the suggested decimal bonus down to 1.5, so 2 is a too high. So, I think you need to either remove that impassable (which messes with the whole 4 corner thing you have going on), or add an extra connection, maybe from Khamovniki to Gagarinsky. Also, if you look, Gagarinski is only attackable from one region, Akademichskiy, which starts as a neutral. That takes that territory out of play from the very beginning.
Additionally, the +2 for the 4 region bonus is also too high as the spreadsheet indicates this should be 1.75. Adding a bridge between Khoroshevo Mnevniki to FIlevskiy Park (which would allow you to make that +3 a +4, since it's 5 regions).
The only other issue I see is that both Khamovniki and Presnensoe border a ton of regions, and both start neutral. I think perhaps inversing the alternation of the neutrals across the inner/outer rings would be very beneficial (except for Zhamoskvorechye and Z.I.).
What do you think cairns?
Oneyed wrote:I notice that title Moskva is still not written right.
your "M" does not exist. and your "V" is russian "b".
try this: MockBa
Oneyed
cairnswk wrote:it is actually written as Mockba but in the Kremlin Courier II Bold font. There is an M and a b.
cairnswk wrote:The title has been changed from Moskva to Mockba.
Oneyed wrote:cairnswk wrote:it is actually written as Mockba but in the Kremlin Courier II Bold font. There is an M and a b.
just now I am looking at all Kremlin Courier II Bold and I must say it is far of Cyrilic.cairnswk wrote:The title has been changed from Moskva to Mockba.
Cyrilic has another order as Kremlin, so you have written Moskda. in Cyrilic is order:
A, B, V, G, D... Kremlin has order A, B, C, D, E...
I will not "popping" you more if you say me that you do not care about Cyrilic and you want to write Moskva your way
(but then you can write it in Chinese and say it is Cyrilic)...
Oneyed
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed, i am surprised by this response, as I find it threatening to say the least.
cairnswk wrote:Personally i don't bloody care if you don't want to offer anything if you are going to have an arrogant attitude, even if you are correct.
cairnswk wrote:Also, since you appear to be educated and writing in English, then please get the English correct.
cairnswk wrote:It is not that i an unwilling to change it to want you want, i simply explained to you what i had done.
Now, moving forward, in the next version you will see it will be posted as MockBa or better still Моцкба (since that appears to be the correct Russian writing for the name)
cairnswk wrote:And if you are not happy with this response then please do not come back into the thread and post...there are others who can and will fill your shoes.
Oneyed wrote:just now I am looking at all Kremlin Courier II Bold and I must say it is far of Cyrilic.
Oneyed wrote:try this: MockBa
Oneyed wrote:...
I learned Russian more as 10 years, so I know about what I speak. so it would be better for you to learn something as kicking off people from "your" thread.
Oneyed
koontz1973 wrote:...
This is a stupid thing to argue about right now. Graphics are next and it may all change.
cairnswk wrote:Oneyed...nobody is kicking you off the thread...i simply stated it that "i don't care if you don't want to offer anything..." and "if you are not happy with this response then please do not come back..." <- that is NOT kicking you off the thread.
cairnswk wrote:but i was most unhapy with the initial statement you posted telling me i don't care about Cyrillic....
"I will not "popping" you more if you say me that you do not care about Cyrilic and you want to write Moskva your way
(but then you can write it in Chinese and say it is Cyrilic)..."
...it is not that i don't care about Cyrillic, it is more important to me to have some consistency on the map and the use of the Kremlin font gave this consistency between title and legend - up to now. There is nothing written anywhere that says I have to write Moskva in Cyrillic, but in actual fact i would prefer to use something that is more identifiable to most players on this site.
cairnswk wrote:koontz1973 wrote:...
This is a stupid thing to argue about right now. Graphics are next and it may all change.
correct koontz1973
Users browsing this forum: No registered users