Moderator: Cartographers
Lupo wrote:At the end this map has been quenched without trying to improve it, neither changing some names.
Only 'cause Rj said he was abandoning this map, this was enough to quench it.
Honestly, this is very sad: why have we waited all this time?
Simply this is no sense, much better to quench this map half year ago then!
I'm not satisfied at all about the management of this map. (I'm referring in particular to the Carthographers)
Anyway, I'm happy for RJ that could finally enjoy plaing his map.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Ruben Cassar wrote:RjBeals wrote:Lupo's post was insane. I remember reading it and getting disappointed. I know he/she has strong feelings for the map, and I realize there are few borders / rivers that aren't true to the italian landscape - but it's only a game. It's not going in a textbook. Lupo had a huge post with reference maps and such. Would have almost taken a fresh start to fix some of the areas. I have much respect for Lupo, but I wasn't planning on making some/most of the changes requested.
I agree with you RJ. I love it when a map is authentic but I also know this is not always possible when it involves gameplay as I have tried to do a CC map myself. Lupo probably does not know how difficult it can be as he never tried to make a map.
The only thing I would like to change is that Milano issue I mentioned earlier but I know it would hinder gameplay at this stage since it was not thought out at the start. That's why I say again...
Andy QUENCH this map now!
mibi wrote:I must say this map is drop dead gorgeous and I'd say, captures the essence of its subject more than any other place specific map on the site. Especially the type and color choices.
well done.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Coleman wrote:BOB doesn't understand the new xml. That's the problem, they've been working on a version that does though.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
Users browsing this forum: No registered users