Moderator: Cartographers
Iliad wrote:46 territories. Can't wait till it's out so I can create 3 player games and demolish my opponents because of the ridiculous number of territories gained on first turn.
But this also will be very good in triples games.
hulmey wrote:I dont like the new additions you have made with the impassables, it seems to cluttter the map. It is however necessary for people who dont know anything about the map (damn them).
One thing i had noticed concerning game play was the i thought that there was a separate bonus for the walls i.e,
Outer and inner wall hold there own bonus.
I think this is alot better, considering the amount of attackpoints the outer wall has!!!!
What does everyone else think???
hulmey wrote:I dont like the new additions you have made with the impassables, it seems to cluttter the map. It is however necessary for people who dont know anything about the map (damn them).
One thing i had noticed concerning game play was the i thought that there was a separate bonus for the walls i.e,
Outer and inner wall hold there own bonus.
I think this is alot better, considering the amount of attackpoints the outer wall has!!!!
What does everyone else think???
Zorg_rsk wrote:Wow! Fantasic map, I absolutley love it.
The only thing, looking at it for the first time. That I could see as any sort of problem, is the mention:
"Any Camp + the Gate"
Now looking at the map, I eventualy came to the conclusion that you meant just the woods/river "camps". However I found this a bit confusing and at first thought it freffering to the main "continents" around the castle.
I think my main misundestanding came from the following:
1. I didn't at first recognise the "woods" camp because it dosn't look like a camp and from the legend it was a bit difficult to see.
2. The icon for "Any Camp + the Gate" looks like a 4 quater square instead of the 2 halves it is. This is probably because of the water/plains divided at close to a quarter.
Sorry if this seems nitpicky, but it confused me at first.
Other than that the map looks sound and I'd love to play it.
Coleman wrote:mibi: Thanks for the version without numbers and an indication of the size of your small map, I'm working on your xml now even if you don't want me too yet.
EDIT: http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/Seige!.xml <- Finished xml (with bad centering, still working on that), but a goofy link, you'll have to copy paste it into your browser to see it because of the !
EDIT2: http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/Seige2.xml <- Completely Finished XML. Should be centered and everything.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Guiscard wrote:As for the camps, the one thing I find slightly weird is the words used for 'Forest' and 'Woods Camp'. 'Woods Camp' sounds a bit off, and I think you'd generally describe it as 'Forest Camp' with 'Woods' by itself for the main cont. Could the names be swapped around?
Secondly, is the gate not actually a draw bridge? 'Any camp and the gate' is a little confusing... You might not see a gate... But any camp and the drawbridge is a bit more understandable.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Guiscard wrote:Guiscard wrote:As for the camps, the one thing I find slightly weird is the words used for 'Forest' and 'Woods Camp'. 'Woods Camp' sounds a bit off, and I think you'd generally describe it as 'Forest Camp' with 'Woods' by itself for the main cont. Could the names be swapped around?
Secondly, is the gate not actually a draw bridge? 'Any camp and the gate' is a little confusing... You might not see a gate... But any camp and the drawbridge is a bit more understandable.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
Guiscard wrote:The drawbridge is the more minor issue. I actually think 'woods camp' is wrong. 'Forest camp' has a more viable sound to it, whereas 'Woods' by themselves are fine too.
I'd say 'I'm in the camp in the woods'
but 'I'm in the forest camp'
mibi wrote:"Woods" by itself feels like its lacking something. Woods. Woods. Woods. oh like Tiger Woods?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users