Conquer Club

SIEGE! - PSD available - [Quenched]

Care to peruse completed maps? Take a stroll through the Atlas.

Moderator: Cartographers

Forum rules
Please read the Community Guidelines before posting.

Postby mibi on Sat Apr 07, 2007 10:42 pm

changes:
1. added a key
2. small map
3. added colemans name

Image

small mazn

Image
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Coleman on Sun Apr 08, 2007 1:53 am

mibi: Thanks for the version without numbers and an indication of the size of your small map, I'm working on your xml now even if you don't want me too yet. :lol:

EDIT: http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/Seige!.xml <- Finished xml (with bad centering, still working on that), but a goofy link, you'll have to copy paste it into your browser to see it because of the !

EDIT2: http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/Seige2.xml <- Completely Finished XML. Should be centered and everything.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Iliad on Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:44 am

46 territories. Can't wait till it's out so I can create 3 player games and demolish my opponents because of the ridiculous number of territories gained on first turn. :twisted:
But this also will be very good in triples games.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Iliad
 
Posts: 10394
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:48 am

Postby Coleman on Sun Apr 08, 2007 5:47 am

Iliad wrote:46 territories. Can't wait till it's out so I can create 3 player games and demolish my opponents because of the ridiculous number of territories gained on first turn. :twisted:
But this also will be very good in triples games.

Have you played World 2.1 with 3 people? Now that is fun! :lol:

EDIT: Wow that was rude of me. Back on topic, if you are looking for something more to do maybe add an alligator or a crocodile to the moat? :P
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby hulmey on Sun Apr 08, 2007 8:08 am

I dont like the new additions you have made with the impassables, it seems to cluttter the map. It is however necessary for people who dont know anything about the map (damn them).

One thing i had noticed concerning game play was the i thought that there was a separate bonus for the walls i.e,

Outer and inner wall hold there own bonus.

I think this is alot better, considering the amount of attackpoints the outer wall has!!!!

What does everyone else think???
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Postby Coleman on Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:03 am

hulmey wrote:I dont like the new additions you have made with the impassables, it seems to cluttter the map. It is however necessary for people who dont know anything about the map (damn them).

One thing i had noticed concerning game play was the i thought that there was a separate bonus for the walls i.e,

Outer and inner wall hold there own bonus.

I think this is alot better, considering the amount of attackpoints the outer wall has!!!!

What does everyone else think???


Well, if I owned the entire castle I'd only need to defend the outer walls and the gate. It might make the castle territories a bit too powerful if each set of walls had a bonus.
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Zorg_rsk on Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:10 am

Wow! Fantasic map, I absolutley love it.

The only thing, looking at it for the first time. That I could see as any sort of problem, is the mention:

"Any Camp + the Gate"

Now looking at the map, I eventualy came to the conclusion that you meant just the woods/river "camps". However I found this a bit confusing and at first thought it freffering to the main "continents" around the castle.

I think my main misundestanding came from the following:

1. I didn't at first recognise the "woods" camp because it dosn't look like a camp and from the legend it was a bit difficult to see.

2. The icon for "Any Camp + the Gate" looks like a 4 quater square instead of the 2 halves it is. This is probably because of the water/plains divided at close to a quarter.


Sorry if this seems nitpicky, but it confused me at first.

Other than that the map looks sound and I'd love to play it.
Image
User avatar
Private 1st Class Zorg_rsk
 
Posts: 119
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 6:13 pm

Postby mibi on Sun Apr 08, 2007 9:29 am

hulmey wrote:I dont like the new additions you have made with the impassables, it seems to cluttter the map. It is however necessary for people who dont know anything about the map (damn them).

One thing i had noticed concerning game play was the i thought that there was a separate bonus for the walls i.e,

Outer and inner wall hold there own bonus.

I think this is alot better, considering the amount of attackpoints the outer wall has!!!!

What does everyone else think???


im not a fan of the added key but invariable some people are going to think they have the ability to pass through walls or something so its needed. Also the walls not having a bonuses as already been discussed. their are too valuable strategically to warrant more bonuses, plus they already have one linked to the throne.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby mibi on Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:03 am

Zorg_rsk wrote:Wow! Fantasic map, I absolutley love it.

The only thing, looking at it for the first time. That I could see as any sort of problem, is the mention:

"Any Camp + the Gate"

Now looking at the map, I eventualy came to the conclusion that you meant just the woods/river "camps". However I found this a bit confusing and at first thought it freffering to the main "continents" around the castle.

I think my main misundestanding came from the following:

1. I didn't at first recognise the "woods" camp because it dosn't look like a camp and from the legend it was a bit difficult to see.

2. The icon for "Any Camp + the Gate" looks like a 4 quater square instead of the 2 halves it is. This is probably because of the water/plains divided at close to a quarter.


Sorry if this seems nitpicky, but it confused me at first.

Other than that the map looks sound and I'd love to play it.


a little sleuthing will turn up that there are only 6 forest/woods areas and only 2 are walled in with smoke rising up and correspond to the darker color in the legend. but if other people have a problem with this and the icon for camp+gate then i can rework it.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby mibi on Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:07 am

Coleman wrote:mibi: Thanks for the version without numbers and an indication of the size of your small map, I'm working on your xml now even if you don't want me too yet. :lol:

EDIT: http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/Seige!.xml <- Finished xml (with bad centering, still working on that), but a goofy link, you'll have to copy paste it into your browser to see it because of the !

EDIT2: http://members.cox.net/gyrigo/CC/Seige2.xml <- Completely Finished XML. Should be centered and everything.


just checked it out, looks great! except for 2 areas. great all 2 and 3 are also touching the stairs and can move to inner wall 1. thanks coleman!
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Coleman on Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:04 am

Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Guiscard on Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:23 am

New impassable legend is a definite improvement. Most players won't have followed this thread and if we can do anything to eliminate the inane 'I can't attack from x to y, its broken/hacked/whatever' posts later on then thats great! As for the graphics, looking good to be honest. I would like a slightly more recognisable feature in the lake, as people have said a crocodile or sharks fin perhaps.

As for the camps, the one thing I find slightly weird is the words used for 'Forest' and 'Woods Camp'. 'Woods Camp' sounds a bit off, and I think you'd generally describe it as 'Forest Camp' with 'Woods' by itself for the main cont. Could the names be swapped around?

Secondly, is the gate not actually a draw bridge? 'Any camp and the gate' is a little confusing... You might not see a gate... But any camp and the drawbridge is a bit more understandable.
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby mibi on Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:37 am

Ok about the POLL

Here is how it currently works:

1.
Woods camp (1) + River camp (2) + Gate (4+4) = 11 because the +4 bonus for any camp + gate is applied twice.

Reason: The gate is the focus of many areas and will be hard to take, having both camps as well is very hard so the +11 is justified

2.
Woods camp (1) + River camp (2) + Gate (3+3) = 11. camp + gate bonues is reduced to 3 and applied twice.

Reason: +11 is too high, +9 is more appropriate

3.
Woods camp (1) + River camp (2) + Gate (4) = 7. camp + gate bonus is only applied once.

Reason: +9 is still too high, +7 is more appropriate.

discuss. vote.
Last edited by mibi on Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:55 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Coleman on Sun Apr 08, 2007 11:53 am

I wouldn't be too upset if +9 won, but +11 really is full of win. :wink:
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby AndyDufresne on Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:22 pm

              Final Forge


---The Siege! Map has reached the ‘Final Forge’ Stage. I've revived this thread from the pits of the Foundry furnace and have examined the contents. Nearly every major concern has been addressed. If there are any other current concerns, please make your voice heard. There will be at least two days (but may extend pass that) for you to post any objections; if no one has posted any protest after two days the map will be deemed finished with the 'Foundry Brand' of approval and will be submitted for live play. If after two days there is still discussion going on it may continue until said discussion has reached the conclusion that the map has reached its final and polished version.

Post questions and concerns if any.


--Andy
User avatar
Corporal 1st Class AndyDufresne
 
Posts: 24935
Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:22 pm
Location: A Banana Palm in Zihuatanejo

Postby hulmey on Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:35 pm

yeah woooooooooooohoooooooooooooooooooooooooo :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
[img]http://img801.imageshack.us/img801/9761/41922610151374166770386.jpg[/mg]
User avatar
Lieutenant hulmey
 
Posts: 3742
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:33 am
Location: Las Vegas

Postby mibi on Sun Apr 08, 2007 10:49 pm

the bonus poll seems to be a slow tie.

keep in mind that the throne + walls bonus is 6 (5+1) and if they have the throne they will have the great hall, which is +3. and so with all those territories you have 1+ 2 + 5 +3 = 11

now the camps/gate bonus with all the territories included is is 1+2+4+4+2=13. so you have 11 vs 13. the only difference is the throne/great hall./ inner walls are defendable from 2 territories. with the outer wall its a total of 5 territories needed for the 11 bonus.

with the camps/gate you need to defend 6 territories. 2 of which, the gate, will be the hardest to take and defend.

i think the +13 is reasonable, and might serve as a last ditch effort to break through the inner wall.

if the gate/camp bonus were 1+2+3+3+2=11 it would be the same as the throne/halls/walls, yet much harder to take and defend.

think about it.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Guiscard on Mon Apr 09, 2007 7:56 am

Guiscard wrote:As for the camps, the one thing I find slightly weird is the words used for 'Forest' and 'Woods Camp'. 'Woods Camp' sounds a bit off, and I think you'd generally describe it as 'Forest Camp' with 'Woods' by itself for the main cont. Could the names be swapped around?

Secondly, is the gate not actually a draw bridge? 'Any camp and the gate' is a little confusing... You might not see a gate... But any camp and the drawbridge is a bit more understandable.


Any response to this? Does anyone else agree? :)
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby haoala on Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:27 am

i think the borders for the woods camp need to be clearer
Gain the upper hand
User avatar
Lieutenant haoala
 
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 7:58 am
Location: Directly opposite the South of Napo

Postby DiM on Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:41 am

Image

final forge finally. congrats.

now a few minor issues. make the borders in the forest a bit more visible (especially the connection to the woods camp). also the numbers in the forest need a tad more glow.

also the impassable/passable legend seems a bit redundant as everyone will imagine he can't attack through a wall. but if you really want to put that legend then add the moat and river as impassable.
“In the beginning God said, the four-dimensional divergence of an antisymmetric, second rank tensor equals zero, and there was light, and it was good. And on the seventh day he rested.”- Michio Kaku
User avatar
Major DiM
 
Posts: 10415
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: making maps for scooby snacks

Postby mibi on Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:15 am

Changes
1. forest borders more visible
2. forest numbers for glow
3. redundant impassable legend removed

Guiscard wrote:
Guiscard wrote:As for the camps, the one thing I find slightly weird is the words used for 'Forest' and 'Woods Camp'. 'Woods Camp' sounds a bit off, and I think you'd generally describe it as 'Forest Camp' with 'Woods' by itself for the main cont. Could the names be swapped around?

Secondly, is the gate not actually a draw bridge? 'Any camp and the gate' is a little confusing... You might not see a gate... But any camp and the drawbridge is a bit more understandable.


I tried this, and not only did it not fit in the space, but the name doesn't sound as good. technically it is a drawbridge. but attacking the drawbridge doesn't sound as good at attacking the gate. barbarians at the gate vs barbarians on the drawbridge. i dunno, im not a fan, but if other people agree with you i can change it. as for people being confused, i don think there is another territory that could be called a gate, so i doubt it will be a problem.

Image
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Guiscard on Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:18 am

The drawbridge is the more minor issue. I actually think 'woods camp' is wrong. 'Forest camp' has a more viable sound to it, whereas 'Woods' by themselves are fine too.

I'd say 'I'm in the camp in the woods'
but 'I'm in the forest camp'
qwert wrote:Can i ask you something?What is porpose for you to open these Political topic in ConquerClub? Why you mix politic with Risk? Why you not open topic like HOT AND SEXY,or something like that.
User avatar
Private 1st Class Guiscard
 
Posts: 4103
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 7:27 pm
Location: In the bar... With my head on the bar

Postby mibi on Mon Apr 09, 2007 11:00 am

Guiscard wrote:The drawbridge is the more minor issue. I actually think 'woods camp' is wrong. 'Forest camp' has a more viable sound to it, whereas 'Woods' by themselves are fine too.

I'd say 'I'm in the camp in the woods'
but 'I'm in the forest camp'


heh... i think its the oposite.... i'd say Woods Camp has a more viable sound and Forest by it self is fine. "Woods" by itself feels like its lacking something. Woods. Woods. Woods. oh like Tiger Woods? heh. Forest as a term is better at standing by itself.

but all this is a bit silly.
User avatar
Captain mibi
 
Posts: 3350
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:19 pm
Location: The Great State of Vermont

Postby Coleman on Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:55 pm

mibi wrote:"Woods" by itself feels like its lacking something. Woods. Woods. Woods. oh like Tiger Woods?


The Hundred Acre Woods :P
The Miur Woods
Bretton Woods
William Woods
Hoods Woods

:lol:
Warning: You may be reading a really old topic.
User avatar
Sergeant Coleman
 
Posts: 5402
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Midwest

Postby Gozar on Mon Apr 09, 2007 3:49 pm

I also like woods and drawbridge.

Other than that, the map looks grand!

Cheers

Gozar
User avatar
Lieutenant Gozar
 
Posts: 2534
Joined: Wed Jan 31, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: Nova Scotia (G1)

PreviousNext

Return to The Atlas

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users