Wisse wrote:it looks really nice but i think its a bit to dark
I disagree, the strong bold colors are perfect for what the community want outside the foundry.
Moderator: Cartographers
Wisse wrote:it looks really nice but i think its a bit to dark
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:Wisse wrote:it looks really nice but i think its a bit to dark
I disagree, the strong bold colors are perfect for what the community want outside the foundry.
Wisse wrote:i already know whats wrong, i looked at the xml test wich seems darker then the normal one (not sure why)
Wisse wrote:i can clearly see the difference between the colour of the map of the ones with xml and the ones without, (i think it is because i have a really good monitor )
but it doesn't matter because the one without xml seems great
pepperonibread wrote:Changes:iancanton wrote:there still seems to be a sharp change of colour in the river just as it enters the lake, but this might be an optical illusion caused by the black line surrounding the lake, which stops abruptly at the river.
-The thing you said about the optical illusion gave me an idea... I faded out the black line around the lake as it gets closer to the river: "feathering" in Photoshop terms. This helps a lot, I think, because you were right, in reality the lake and the river are really the same color.
To do:
-Comments?
iancanton wrote:under normal cc convention, does the bonus for european russia include or exclude the moscow bonus? i know it's the intention for it to be additional. is this the normal interpretation when the bonuses are listed in the legend?
iancanton wrote:any word from the mods about what numbers to display in the bonus key?
ian.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
gimil wrote:iancanton wrote:any word from the mods about what numbers to display in the bonus key?
ian.
are we suppose to?
Coleman wrote:I already xml stamped this right? I remember looking at it.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users