RjBeals wrote:here's a previous draft.. like this?
LIke that but the orange on the outside rather than the green... So the line would read orange green orange or whatever colors stood out more.
Moderator: Cartographers
RjBeals wrote:here's a previous draft.. like this?
Bruceswar wrote:To better get my point across... Say you are driving down the road, and you see Billboards along side it.
This one
and this one
Which one are you more likely to notice?
Personally most would notice the one first with contrasting colors. Same reason Open Signs are Blue and Red etc etc. I think you get the point.
jiminski wrote:RjBeals wrote:](*,)
hahah sorry RJ, FFS just ignore Bruce.
RjBeals wrote:jiminski wrote:RjBeals wrote:](*,)
hahah sorry RJ, FFS just ignore Bruce.
Well, some foundry members do accept all feedback, not that you could tell from the debate in General Discussion right now.
Bruceswar wrote:To better get my point across... Say you are driving down the road, and you see Billboards along side it.
This one
and this one
Which one are you more likely to notice?
Personally most would notice the one first with contrasting colors. Same reason Open Signs are Blue and Red etc etc. I think you get the point.
RjBeals wrote:(EDIT) I get the point sure, but sometimes hard contrast doesn't fit well into the artistic theme of a map
mibi wrote:I think the current borders do an effective job of identifying themselves as impassibles as well as fit in with the aethetic of the map. Any brighter or more contrasted and you will have ruined the delicate balance that RJ has created here.
Take it from me, a world famous graphic designer.
dolomite13 wrote:Please don;t change the impassable border colors, They look fantastic as does the rest of this map. It is quite obvious that the borders are thick and thus denoting that you cannot cross the border.
I really love this revamp.
--D
Warning wrote:This post may contain trace elements of irony.
natty_dread wrote:I was wrong
thenobodies80 wrote:
I'm not a advertising man in real life, but i think that your images and the RJ answer are saying the same thing:
The first image is intentionally (like the map) less flashy.
The creators want that you'll see the beer first and then you'll see the wonderful big hand trying to take it.
In the map you'll see the impassable in a second and then you will search what they mean in the rest of the map.
The impassable text is visible, so you'll find the borders, a bit camouflaged in the trees.
The second image you posted is obviously more flashy.
But if RJ will change the colors, the actual problem is only reversed on the map, like in the orange or yellow example.
Visible on legend, horrible on map.
I'm of the opinion that is better to spend a second searching the impassable explaination than destroy the actual wonderful look of this map.
The map is perfect !
Nice work RJ!
thenobodies80
gimil wrote:An alternative would be to slap a little contrasting glow or something around the unpassable legends part. To be honest though i am not sure this is a grave concern. People will see the 'unpassable' text, see the image next to it and put 2+2 together.
Streching the imagination the only concern that may arise is with colourblind people would may not be able to see it at all. I doubt this will happen however.
RjBeals wrote:where were you people a month ago?
RjBeals wrote:where were you people a month ago?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users