Moderator: Cartographers
nolefan5311 wrote:For one, a classic gameplay style of map isn't going to have starting positions or a losing conditioning. Most of them also don't have the killer neutrals or bonus structures like the public utilities or the parks bonus. They're straight geographical maps with contiguous bonus zones and that's about it.
Personally, I like the GP of the map and don't think it should be changed. I see your concern with calling it a "Classic City" map, but honestly, adding 42 maps to the current rotation that aren't unique at all other than they are cities featured on the classic map is probably a bit silly. Ideally, in my opinion, each map created based on the classic map should have it's own unique GP characteristics.
AndyDufresne wrote:nolefan5311 wrote:For one, a classic gameplay style of map isn't going to have starting positions or a losing conditioning. Most of them also don't have the killer neutrals or bonus structures like the public utilities or the parks bonus. They're straight geographical maps with contiguous bonus zones and that's about it.
Personally, I like the GP of the map and don't think it should be changed. I see your concern with calling it a "Classic City" map, but honestly, adding 42 maps to the current rotation that aren't unique at all other than they are cities featured on the classic map is probably a bit silly. Ideally, in my opinion, each map created based on the classic map should have it's own unique GP characteristics.
Agreed definitely.
--Andy
nolefan5311 wrote:Here you go cairns.
nolefan5311 wrote:I thought I did arrange them accordingly, with maybe a slight variation or two here or there. I know it wasn't completely random.
And thanks, I will change the xml check file this evening sometime.
Nola_Lifer wrote:How we lookin on this one? Last post was 9 days ago.
AndyDufresne wrote:Lookin' forward to this.
--Andy
AndyDufresne wrote:Still lookin' forward to this...
--Andy
AndyDufresne wrote:Still lookin' forward to this...
AndyDufresne wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Still lookin' forward to this...
Still!
--Andy
nolefan5311 wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Still lookin' forward to this...
Still!
--Andy
Me too!!
cairnswk wrote:nolefan5311 wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:AndyDufresne wrote:Still lookin' forward to this...
Still!
--Andy
Me too!!
If the xml is all ready to go and everything is OK, then it needs to be posted here so i can attached it to the image files and then we can get submission.
nolefan5311 wrote:...
It's in the post dated November 4th.
Users browsing this forum: LCol MacDonell