the.killing.44 wrote:Sorry for being rather blunt, cairns, but is this for real?
yeah!. why not? and i won't be offended it's all about imagination and how you use it.
Moderator: Cartographers
the.killing.44 wrote:Sorry for being rather blunt, cairns, but is this for real?
brian fletcher wrote:...
lots of spelling mistakes as usual cairnes but nothing that cant be corrected at a later time.
...
MrBenn wrote:To be completely honest, if this map had been posted by anybody other than you, I am convinced that it would have been ripped to shreds, or ignored to disappear into obscurity.
This is clearly at a stage where it is more than an idea, and belongs in the drafting room, even though I'd much rather you spent your spare time and talent offering support and feedback to others.
[moved]
reggie_mac wrote:We don't like cricket....
...oh no ....
We LOVE IT...
YEAH!!!!!
Dexsting wrote:I have a feeling people will get behind this map because it'll open the floodgates for other sports maps!
Not sure if the idea is original or not, but the holding the "batter" and a "scoring play position" for a bonus and the "batter" and a "Defender" gives a negative is awesome and can transfer to other maps oncea ll the quirks get worked out.
...I'm rooting for this map and hope it scores big!
Generic offense bonuses with offensive plays
Generic offense gets minuses with defenses
defense together can get bonuses (ignore offense, and if the offense tries to break the defense it penalizes them).
Stands, spectators, media, etc for additional bonuses/countries to make the map big enough.
Hopscotcher wrote:Please Excuse my Ignorance:
1. Why is it called Silly Mid-On. Is that a place?
2. What does the "Automatically Links to" mean in the right hand legend?
3. Is the Streaker.... Naked in Cricket? Like a crazed fan? or is that a position?
ttfn,
Hopper
Dexsting wrote:http://www.seattlecricket.com/history/crick.htm
This site and its links to the more advanced parts of cricket is pretty awesome...
I hate my new job's filter, I can't see the maps Oh well. Have to review at home.
As someone had a question about the streaker and making sure they know he's not a special fielder or something from the people who don't know cricket, maybe saying, "Streaker - a nude fan has run onto the field harrassing the bowler and being chased by the police"?
Also, is it police at these games for real, or are they actually security guards?
cairnswk wrote:Dexsting wrote:http://www.seattlecricket.com/history/crick.htm
This site and its links to the more advanced parts of cricket is pretty awesome...
I hate my new job's filter, I can't see the maps Oh well. Have to review at home.
As someone had a question about the streaker and making sure they know he's not a special fielder or something from the people who don't know cricket, maybe saying, "Streaker - a nude fan has run onto the field harrassing the bowler and being chased by the police"?
Also, is it police at these games for real, or are they actually security guards?
I'll have a look at all this later Dexsting...but i have never been to this cricket "home", so i can't say if it is a streaker, but there is a police office on the ground. So....maybe Brian Fletcher could answer this. I know i've seen police on TV coverage.
The streaker idea is good, but that is only part of what's going on, and i don't know if fitting all that into the top is possible. I'll see.
Kalano Sanchin wrote:It might not seem like much as I don't post in the foundry I just watch, but I will give my support to this in whatever way possible to get the map going even if it is just one post saying the smallest detail...
Dexsting wrote:I still think the bonus for a 4-run doesn't need to include holding a fielder. It would make it too confusing that you'd have to include a specific fielder or any fielder. I do like that you have to go through a fielder to get the bonus of a net +1 (-1 batsman and fielder, +2 batsman and four). Then, if the fielder's try to get you out by attacking the fielder, then missing and being unable to take the battsman or the four you get a +2 (makes me think of a wild throw or something like that which gives the person holding the battsman an additional run.
Not sure if we're discussion neutrals yet...But I think the battsman, fours, & sixes should all start neutral, and maybe escalating neutrals from batsman to four to sixes. Don't know if battsman 2, fours be 4, and sixes be 6 neutrals would work for gameplay, but I imagine I think they would and also end up being good numbers to fit the story of the map too.
brian fletcher wrote:
england are challenging australia, not is.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users