What I like: super clean looking map. Borders, regions, impassables, and connections are all easy to follow. In terms of gameplay, I also appreciate a straightforward map with no twists that you can only appreciate by losing on the map a few times. And the mountains behind the title are fantastic.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab852/ab85230313916cbfc3e09e993c7dffd17d2f129c" alt="Shocked :shock:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a9335/a93358a8e50f9462250f386d06e3a4731250ff58" alt="Applause =D>"
Little tweaks: it'd be nice if the rail lines didn't cross under not station territories - somebody is going to think that Midtown is a part of the line. And I'm unclear as to what territories a station can attack: are Deer Lake and Hastings "adjacent" to the Fraserview Station? Because while the station doesn't lie in Deer Lake, it is adjacent - and touching the border. And what exactly are you calling the stations?
Color blindness is an issue with the legend. I can totally tell the regions apart on the map, i just can't put them together with the circles in the legend. As a colorblind player I don't have trouble with fields of similar color so much as I have trouble with smaller samplings of color. Two remedies would be either a minimap, or region titles on the map itself (which is always my preference). It's nice to have a method of identifying a region that isn't 100% color dependent.
And if you follow my posts in the Foundry you'll know that I'm like a broken record on this issue (and I think I've said it before here): what makes this Vancouver? If you changed the title of the map to "Greater Tampa & St. Pete's" for example only residents of Vancouver or Tampa would know the difference. Again, the mountains are subtle and sublime - I'm hungry for more flavor.
And just for shits and giggles...
http://www.fplfibernet.com/networks/ima ... mpaMap.jpg