boberz wrote:qwert wrote:Boberz do you got something against my country, if you realy want to know what these mean, take translator and find what these mean.
nothinbg against your country but i cannot even read the letters to translate, not saying they are offensive but not telling people wha\t it means is being deliberately obstructive
hulmey, why is nit-picking such a bad thing...
Nit picking is when you make a big deal out of an issue that's not really an issue, such as say the borders. Nit picking isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it shouldn't hold up the map making process if the author is against making such small changes.
Let's see... NO. That's not how the process works. It doesn't work by "let's set some issues out, address them, and be done," it works by "here's a thought. Let's look at it. Here's an issue. Here's a preference." And they all get examined. qwert doesn't want to play by the rules every mapmaker has to play by and find out if each suggestion/thought/preference/idea/whateverthehellelsepeoplewanttosling has merit. As an excuse to avoid it, he started to try this "appeal to the people" bullshit, and now it's causing problems in the foundry. But the foundry process isn't one of the majority, it's a process of reason. The majority can provide information, but if something is obviously bad, or could clearly be improved, the mapmaker doesn't need a poll. If qwert wants the map to be quenched, he needs to suck it up and be willing to try the suggestions of others to see if they bear merit, instead of throwing a huge fit whenever anyone suggests something he doesn't like.
You think I'm gonna fall for an appeal to the people, qwert is less than coherent most of the time, which makes it difficult to persuade people, I'm just calling it like I see it.
Eh, we have suggestions that have been discussed, I'm not dismissing any new ideas/problems people might have, provided they are genuine concerns, I'm just saying that of the things currently brought up, only two really need to be addressed. The seas/bonuses.
The army circles were deemed to be fine as they were, and something like 7 to 3 were against changing them, for example.
EDIT: To Guiscard and other posters, yes qwert has been most uncooperative throughout the thread, but at this stage there are few suggestions that haven't been discussed. Regardless of qwert's attitude in the past, or poor reasoning for rejecting suggestions, this map is almost ready to be quenched, as more or less all the problems have been dealt with.
[/url] Clicky Either One
