Moderator: Cartographers
qwert wrote:well i think that i finish with all what is request for these Map stage.
Only what is left is size approwal from Lack.When these will be i realy dont know,so we must waith. Se you when these map get green light.
Coleman Posted: 18 Sep 2007 15:28 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
qwert wrote:
well i think that i finish with all what is request for these Map stage.
Only what is left is size approwal from Lack.When these will be i realy dont know,so we must waith. Se you when these map get green light.
Well, unfortunately, now that I know more inside information the current stand is that all maps outside the size restrictions are not going to make it out of the foundry. In fact we are going to keep maps outside the guidelines in Map Ideas until a future time when we may support 'super size maps'. I know that sucks, but that's all I can really say at the moment. I'd recommend focusing on your other maps for a while and then coming back to this after we (the moderators and site operators) have all agreed on how we want to handle the idea of super size maps. Your chances are probably much better once(if) Western Front is quenched.
qwert wrote:lt_oddball
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
England should be able to be invaded...or else there could be no total victory possible with One player on the continent and the other stuck in England.
I repeat again (with fellow critics) please change provinces/areas to how it was tactically perceived in those days.
So look at difficult crossable terrain (major rivers, fortified defense lines, mountain ranges = impassable borders)on one hand (which means many small zones) and fast paced open terrains on the other hand (larger zones where Germans in 1940 and allies in 1944 moved like lightning, and forget about political motivated areas (Vichy ? what 's the point of using that ?) and army commander areas (it just makes no sense to combine that in one map).
That would make it better gameplay than it is now.
I spend so many hours in researching and i can not find some others solution for these provinces,if you can find better please give me. Vichy?You realy dont know for these political state during WWII?
qwert wrote:News?
volfan wrote:This map is cool. I'm sick of the restrictionsWhen did a big map hurt anyone
![]()
d.gishman wrote:This map is amazing...
I dont understand why the guidelines are so strict, it seems more like stubbornness than logic to me.
unriggable Posted: 05 Nov 2007 01:36 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
d.gishman wrote:
This map is amazing...
I dont understand why the guidelines are so strict, it seems more like stubbornness than logic to me.
Depends on computer screen. makes a lot of sense. This doesnt even fir the large map criteria, small map would blow sooo baaad.
unriggable Posted: 10 Nov 2007 15:11 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get rid of territories, right the map is unplayable.
Jesse710 Posted: 25 Nov 2007 12:57 Post subject:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any word yet?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users