Looks like the final version still had "reservoirs" spelled incorrectly. Oops! Any chance this can still be updated? Nothing else about the map changed - just corrected the typo.
Moderator: Cartographers
iAmCaffeine wrote:Sorry, but how did this get a graphics stamp?
koontz1973 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sorry, but how did this get a graphics stamp?
Why would it not get the stamp? What in your opinion is wrong with it?
it doesn't stand up to any of the current maps
iAmCaffeine wrote:koontz1973 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sorry, but how did this get a graphics stamp?
Why would it not get the stamp? What in your opinion is wrong with it?
Such a low standard, it doesn't stand up to any of the current maps, apart from Philadelphia but that's not saying much.
Comment early, see changes made, comment late, see them ignored by map makers.
koontz1973 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:koontz1973 wrote:iAmCaffeine wrote:Sorry, but how did this get a graphics stamp?
Why would it not get the stamp? What in your opinion is wrong with it?
Such a low standard, it doesn't stand up to any of the current maps, apart from Philadelphia but that's not saying much.
OK, but again, what is wrong with it?
Considering this one had longer than normal in the foundry and also a long beta, it might come down to a lesson learned.Comment early, see changes made, comment late, see them ignored by map makers.
iAmCaffeine, been noticing you a lot lately over in #GCCM thread , this was the whole point of it. To get payers like you here commenting on the maps. But it would be nice to get you commenting on maps whilst they are being made.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users