Conquer Club

Accused:

Darthvadar




The accused are suspected of:

Ratings abuse


Game number(s):
Game 5716550
Game 5727939
Game 5531716
Game 5707955

these are just a few



Comments: Look at pretty much any of his ratings given out that are all 1 stars. Know what they all have in common? He's lost those games! He is a whinging sore loser who gives bad feedback to people that beat him! Take away the privilege he's been given!!!

hahaha3hahaha wrote:Accused:

Darthvadar




The accused are suspected of:

Ratings abuse


Game number(s):
Game 5716550
Game 5727939
Game 5531716
Game 5707955

these are just a few



Comments: Look at pretty much any of his ratings given out that are all 1 stars. Know what they all have in common? He's lost those games! He is a whinging sore loser who gives bad feedback to people that beat him! Take away the privilege he's been given!!!

STFU Convict and go grow a pair. rattings were left according to the game that was played.
Go cry to your mum. Up the Ashes

Darthvadar wrote:

hahaha3hahaha wrote:Accused:

Darthvadar




The accused are suspected of:

Ratings abuse


Game number(s):
Game 5716550
Game 5727939
Game 5531716
Game 5707955

these are just a few



Comments: Look at pretty much any of his ratings given out that are all 1 stars. Know what they all have in common? He's lost those games! He is a whinging sore loser who gives bad feedback to people that beat him! Take away the privilege he's been given!!!

STFU Convict and go grow a pair. rattings were left according to the game that was played.
Go cry to your mum. Up the Ashes

not an appropriate respinse

Ill mark this as pending and we will have a decent look at this.

Uhmm...as one the those down-under, i hope the inappropriateness does not relate to the "Convict" tag...shiite if we don't let the unwashed have their little poke now and again how are we ever goign to put them in their place???
Seriously...lot's of other crap happenning here but pls never let p.c. come between ozzies stirring those soap dodgers...chz

DJPatrick wrote:Uhmm...as one the those down-under, i hope the inappropriateness does not relate to the "Convict" tag...shiite if we don't let the unwashed have their little poke now and again how are we ever goign to put them in their place???
Seriously...lot's of other crap happenning here but pls never let p.c. come between ozzies stirring those soap dodgers...chz

lord voldemort wrote:not an appropriate respinse

Ill mark this as pending and we will have a decent look at this.

Just lol.

DJPatrick wrote:Uhmm...as one the those down-under, i hope the inappropriateness does not relate to the "Convict" tag...shiite if we don't let the unwashed have their little poke now and again how are we ever goign to put them in their place???
Seriously...lot's of other crap happenning here but pls never let p.c. come between ozzies stirring those soap dodgers...chz

Epic LOL

I think Darth is calling them like he sees em. His ratings look legit.

PS> Whats a soap dodger?

he plays fare and he rates 5 stars and 1 stars like anyone else

Just a clarification (soap dodger = pommie git)
Not commenting on Darth's alledged niggardly rating scale but on the "innapropriateness" ruled on...
Political correctness has it's place (Owenator) but there is no room ofr it between Poms and Ozzies...they pile shit on each other as a national pastime and so it should be...similarly between Australians and those sheep-shaggers across the ditch...it happens and it is all good.
As the inappropriate rating was bestowed by an Ozzie moderator it may also have related to the British scumbag's reference to the Ashes...let it go, Mod...if we don't let them win now and again they'll take their bat and go home...they'd take their balls as well but are yet to find them...chz

darkangelsguy205 wrote:he plays fare and he rates 5 stars and 1 stars like anyone else

Last time I checked there werent too many cowards who foe and give 1 star ratings to everyone who happened to beat them. Your contribution (if it can be called that) doesn't mean 2 shits, seeing that you say he plays fair because YOU have not recieved unfair negative ratings from him.

DJPatrick wrote:Just a clarification (soap dodger = pommie git)
Not commenting on Darth's alledged niggardly rating scale but on the "innapropriateness" ruled on...
Political correctness has it's place (Owenator) but there is no room ofr it between Poms and Ozzies...they pile shit on each other as a national pastime and so it should be...similarly between Australians and those sheep-shaggers across the ditch...it happens and it is all good.
As the inappropriate rating was bestowed by an Ozzie moderator it may also have related to the British scumbag's reference to the Ashes...let it go, Mod...if we don't let them win now and again they'll take their bat and go home...they'd take their balls as well but are yet to find them...chz

What's that? Is that a colony I hear? Oh no, it's just tumbleweed again. Honestly, win a couple of one-dayers and they think they're good enough to come here and pour us drinks! Walkabout? Why don't they walk about 200 miles due south from King's Cross.

So ban me.

I've looked at the games, and Darthvadar's reactions are commonplace. Some of the players were being wankers anyway.

Just look through his ratings left on page 1: (let's say, after seeing the 1st pages, roughly 70% are 5 stars, 1 stars can be about 10% and in between maybe 20%). Now actually look further than that, and one can see nearly 95% 5-star ratings. This isn't abuse, this is better than normal--Darthvadar's a good guy when it comes to leaving ratings. As for his negative ratings? Completely commonplace; they're based on his opinion and most likely done in defense to a incoming 1-star rating from his opponent (I bet you we'll see that from hahaha and Darthvadar's ratings for one another). Darthvadar's ratings are not abusive. We've seen people before being abusive with ratings, and Darthvadar can hardly even be considered to be even remotely similar to them.

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=Legio
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=CHAVEZ81
http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?mode=ratings2&username=JaMarcus

Those three are definite ratings abusers, and when properly compared to Darthvadar's Ratings Left are drastically different.

Also, judging from this particular past game chat between hahahaha and Darthvadar, one can easily see what the main motive is for hahaha's poorly founded accusation. [http://www.conquerclub.com/game.php?game=5766646

This accusation is poorly grounded, highly subjective, and was fueled by a complete lack of clearheadedness on hahaha's part. There's no evidence which indicates that Darthvadar abusively rates people. In fact, given Darthvadar's history of Ratings Left, he is in fact a Benevolent Player Rater.

DJPatrick wrote:Just a clarification (soap dodger = pommie git)
Not commenting on Darth's alledged niggardly rating scale but on the "innapropriateness" ruled on.

Hey LV or any other C&A mod. Are you going to look the other way in re of this post?

I know someone who received a SEVERE INFRACTON warning for using the less obvious slang word variant of this racial word that started with "w".

jefjef wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Just a clarification (soap dodger = pommie git)
Not commenting on Darth's alledged niggardly rating scale but on the "innapropriateness" ruled on.

Hey LV or any other C&A mod. Are you going to look the other way in re of this post?

I know someone who received a SEVERE INFRACTON warning for using the less obvious slang word variant of this racial word that started with "w".

All in context, jef. I don't think he was using "niggardly" to bait him; when it was used against owen it was in the midst of a racial … argument, so it made sense to be warned then.

Also, good to know soap dodger = pommie git. Lolwut?

the.killing.44 wrote:

jefjef wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Just a clarification (soap dodger = pommie git)
Not commenting on Darth's alledged niggardly rating scale but on the "innapropriateness" ruled on.

Hey LV or any other C&A mod. Are you going to look the other way in re of this post?

I know someone who received a SEVERE INFRACTON warning for using the less obvious slang word variant of this racial word that started with "w".

All in context, jef. I don't think he was using "niggardly" to bait him; when it was used against owen it was in the midst of a racial … argument, so it made sense to be warned then.

Also, good to know soap dodger = pommie git. Lolwut?

All in context? The word and meaning always remain the same. I think I will wait on owenshooters review and decision.

BTW. I am white and a conservative republican and I find that word offensive and useless. No matter in what "context" it is used.

While I have seen Darth lose it here and there, most of the 1 stars are for delay tactics and ignorant play by opponents. I wish Darth would avoid freestyle all together, but it's the player's choice in which games they join. Ratings abuse, not enough data to prove that. The comments above, I'll let the C&A folks do their job either way.

jefjef wrote:

DJPatrick wrote:Just a clarification (soap dodger = pommie git)
Not commenting on Darth's alledged niggardly rating scale but on the "innapropriateness" ruled on.

Hey LV or any other C&A mod. Are you going to look the other way in re of this post?

I know someone who received a SEVERE INFRACTON warning for using the less obvious slang word variant of this racial word that started with "w".

Before you start accusing someone look up the word to make sure you know what you are talking about, which you obviously didnt do in this case.

CONTEXT is everything, especially with words like 'niggardly'. The problem with most people is that they speak the language but dont bother to learn it.

niggardly and nigger are not the same words. Kthxbai.

xelabale wrote:niggardly and nigger are not the same words. Kthxbai.

That is true. "snigger" was used in it's context also and was found in violation.

Unfortunately words are interpreted in the eye of the beholder.

Just makes one wonder why "stingy" wasn't used instead of a word that could have possible hidden translations.

He probably didn't intend the hidden meaning but that I do not know.

Jef - there surely is no "hidden meaning" - are you just trying to cause trouble? There are plenty of bigoted comments on this site that are now being addressed more seriously (thankfully) - this is not one - buy yourself a dictionary at Christmas

Nipper

Nigeria.


Ban me.

nippersean wrote:Jef - there surely is no "hidden meaning" - are you just trying to cause trouble? There are plenty of bigoted comments on this site that are now being addressed more seriously (thankfully) - this is not one - buy yourself a dictionary at Christmas

Nipper

I am not trying to cause trouble nipper. Got better things to do thank you. It's just a name I personally hate and many misuse associated words to be sly. And it does not just have 1 interpretation.

I hope it was used only as it appears. If it was I apologize to the user.

And yes it's good to see CC take a stand against bigot crap.

But thanks for questioning MY motives.

jefjef wrote:

nippersean wrote:Jef - there surely is no "hidden meaning" - are you just trying to cause trouble? There are plenty of bigoted comments on this site that are now being addressed more seriously (thankfully) - this is not one - buy yourself a dictionary at Christmas

Nipper

I am not trying to cause trouble nipper. Got better things to do thank you. It's just a name I personally hate and many misuse associated words to be sly. And it does not just have 1 interpretation.

I hope it was used only as it appears. If it was I apologize to the user.

And yes it's good to see CC take a stand against bigot crap.

But thanks for questioning MY motives.

Niggardly only has one meaning, and so does 'snigger'. The problem only arises if you put a meaning to the word that does not exist. Any percieved insult from these words is just that, percieved.

Gypsys Kiss wrote:

jefjef wrote:

nippersean wrote:Jef - there surely is no "hidden meaning" - are you just trying to cause trouble? There are plenty of bigoted comments on this site that are now being addressed more seriously (thankfully) - this is not one - buy yourself a dictionary at Christmas

Nipper

I am not trying to cause trouble nipper. Got better things to do thank you. It's just a name I personally hate and many misuse associated words to be sly. And it does not just have 1 interpretation.

I hope it was used only as it appears. If it was I apologize to the user.

And yes it's good to see CC take a stand against bigot crap.

But thanks for questioning MY motives.

Niggardly only has one meaning, and so does 'snigger'. The problem only arises if you put a meaning to the word that does not exist. Any percieved insult from these words is just that, percieved.

Unfortunately, that appears to be enough, as regards use of the word "snigger" (which was ridiculous).

this is well off topic. lockage