Conquer Club

Accused:

~barnygumble~
buffguy1996

The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Other: Game Chat Abuse

Game number(s):

Game 5566478

Comments:

Both claim 12 years of age and from Dallas/Fortworth Texas on their respective profiles. Curious how 2 12 year old who speak and spell things the same from the same area both happen to join the same game.

Both can't seem to use any words except "fagget", which isn't even spelled correctly, but whatever.

Even if they're not multi's, they're obviously friends or siblings playing together in public games, and they're winning the majority of them.

On top of that, ffs CC, they're fucking 12. I wouldn't be surprised if 8 year olds started joining this site. Make a goddamn age limit.

2009-09-09 17:05:02 - buffguy1996: u faget teal
2009-09-09 17:06:10 - ~barnygumble~: fagget teal..... party in the usa toatally listen to it! and papperazzi lady gaGA
2009-09-09 17:08:26 - ~barnygumble~: its ur pinus fagget noob!
2009-09-09 17:10:47 - ~barnygumble~: thats a faggett! lol

I find that kinda funny, but not something that needs to be discussed. Big voilation of bigotry guildlines, or somewhere in that nature.

Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

sailorseal wrote:Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

Not to go off-topic, but I'm happy I didn't have to watch that.

sailorseal wrote:Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

I fail to see the relevance. I would contend that exercising one's right to listen, or not to listen, to someone else speak is in no way suggestive that their intelligence or their behavior is lacking.

That being said, these two young children are definitely lacking in many areas. One obviously being a parent that isn't afraid to cause their child discomfort when attempting to sit down.

Sorry to drag everyone off topic

colton24 wrote::lol: I find that kinda funny, but not something that needs to be discussed. Big voilation of bigotry guildlines, or somewhere in that nature.

I didn't open this because I wanted this to be discussed - I posted it because I wanted it to be looked at. See, back in the day, trolls weren't quite as common, and C&A was less of a shit hole.

Anyways, what are you all even talking about? How do you get off-topic in 2 posts? That's just terrible.

Kotaro wrote:

colton24 wrote::lol: I find that kinda funny, but not something that needs to be discussed. Big voilation of bigotry guildlines, or somewhere in that nature.

I didn't open this because I wanted this to be discussed - I posted it because I wanted it to be looked at. See, back in the day, trolls weren't quite as common, and C&A was less of a shit hole.

Anyways, what are you all even talking about? How do you get off-topic in 2 posts? That's just terrible.

Colton is actually on topic, but hes disussing the posting guidelines, not the obvious fact that they are probably the same person

I cant defend the other guy though.

"Pinus"

Really?

colton24 wrote:

sailorseal wrote:Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

Not to go off-topic, but I'm happy I didn't have to watch that.

you would probably have to be enrolled in an accredited school to have the option to see it... and what an ignorant statement that was, why don't you go read the entire speech as it is posted online. it could do you some good. with your poor grammar and horrendous spelling, you could use a pep talk on taking your edumacasion suriusly...

and as far as kot's complaint goes, they should receive a warning for the "fagget" comments, and have an IP check run on their tender behinds...-0

Not taking the bait...bitch...I am enrolled in one of the top 10 state schools FYI. It wasn't a forced thing to watch. Anyways we were in the computer lab when the speech was going on.

owenshooter wrote:

colton24 wrote:

sailorseal wrote:Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

Not to go off-topic, but I'm happy I didn't have to watch that.

you would probably have to be enrolled in an accredited school to have the option to see it... and what an ignorant statement that was, why don't you go read the entire speech as it is posted online. it could do you some good. with your poor grammar and horrendous spelling, you could use a pep talk on taking your edumacasion suriusly...

and as far as kot's complaint goes, they should receive a warning for the "fagget" comments, and have an IP check run on their tender behinds...-0

Poor grammer and horrendous spelling? That is exactly why I get all A's.

colton24 wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

colton24 wrote:

sailorseal wrote:Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

Not to go off-topic, but I'm happy I didn't have to watch that.

you would probably have to be enrolled in an accredited school to have the option to see it... and what an ignorant statement that was, why don't you go read the entire speech as it is posted online. it could do you some good. with your poor grammar and horrendous spelling, you could use a pep talk on taking your edumacasion suriusly...

and as far as kot's complaint goes, they should receive a warning for the "fagget" comments, and have an IP check run on their tender behinds...-0

Poor grammer and horrendous spelling? That is exactly why I get all A's.

Classic. Just simply classic. Also, I'd quote your first couple hundred posts but there's a limit.

colton24 wrote:

owenshooter wrote:

colton24 wrote:

sailorseal wrote:Ignorant trashy children, I wouldn't be surprised if they opted out of the president's speech.
Disgusting.

Not to go off-topic, but I'm happy I didn't have to watch that.

you would probably have to be enrolled in an accredited school to have the option to see it... and what an ignorant statement that was, why don't you go read the entire speech as it is posted online. it could do you some good. with your poor grammar and horrendous spelling, you could use a pep talk on taking your edumacasion suriusly...

and as far as kot's complaint goes, they should receive a warning for the "fagget" comments, and have an IP check run on their tender behinds...-0

Poor grammer and horrendous spelling? That is exactly why I get all A's.

if that's true, then I weep for the education system nowadays.

I weep because C&A is a cesspool for you fucking trolls.

Take your flaming colton24 elsewhere, I don't give a damn about that shit. Stop spamming my thread with your crap.

back to the matter at hand, maybe a little banning would teach these kids a lesson(probably not). I do agree with an age requirement for the site though.

No. That drives away some people. I have a few friends on this site, but they don't post much. Plus I payed $25 and I ain't leaving this site. Anways someone could lie easily.

Buffy lives about 5 mins from me literally. With that said and being 12.. lets cut some slack. I warning for the lang should be enough.

Edited to add I do not believe these people are multis.

Kotaro wrote:I weep because C&A is a cesspool for you fucking trolls.

Take your flaming colton24 elsewhere, I don't give a damn about that shit. Stop spamming my thread with your crap.

E-tix next time, if you don't want colton to reply, because as soon as he does he brings his pets and then the bigger animals get attracted. I found it impossible to make seemingly legit cases so I use e-tix for multi cases nowadays.

Kotaro wrote:I weep because C&A is a cesspool for you fucking trolls.

Take your flaming colton24 elsewhere, I don't give a damn about that shit. Stop spamming my thread with your crap.

Is that "flaming of colton24" or "flaming, colton24," (meaning colton's the one flaming)?


BTW, I think they should get a warning. However, I do not believe they're multis.

these people are not very good at spelling either

40kguy wrote:these people are not very good at spelling either

40kguy at post viewtopic.php?f=57&t=96347&view=unread#p2201764 wrote:well right off the bat this is probably in the wrong fourm it should probably be in the general discution form not the Q&A and second i dont know there are multiple people that i would like to ban

i see more bad spelling in this forum than any other. maybe that is cuz they are mostly 12 and under.

locked to avoid further trolling and baiting again.

Checking their accounts, no, they do not look like multi accounts. Most likely friends. If there are more games which would show more evidence of secret alliance, then we can look further by then. Looking at the game chat, they indeed, look like kids.

Anyway, for their own sake, not really a warning though, but more of a reminder, for both to be more diligent when trash talking in the game chat. This is noted and let's hope that if they are to trash talk in the game, it will be just trash talk.

This shall remain locked as some people can't seem to control themselves from posting irrelevantly to the report.

And please, try to minimize the attacks. Currently, I am already short-handed as it is.