alex951 wrote:codeblue1018 wrote:Accused:
General Hunglow
The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Comments:
Score:1140 Games:18 completed, 9 (50%) won, freemium --- won first fudeal game on first attempt and has been winning on that map ever since. Already plays the stall game etc. Smells!
so what is the name of the other account? the only think you have proven is that this person did some research before playing, that this person did not just f-around like most of use during our first 5 game.
if you want this case to continue you need to collect more evidence
to be honest, and I cant believe Im siding with codeblue here, the response from
General Hunglow is the classic response from a multi.
Maybe code needs to present more evidence, but I have a feeling his hunch is right in this case
But here you go here's more evidence for you:
Game 5555786Guy joined Tue Aug 25, 2009 12:15 pm but in the game I mentioned above he states in the chat
Game 5555786 Chat wrote:2009-09-07 18:45:22 - General Hunglow: this is why i dont play you high ranked losers, you guys get so butt hurt
2009-09-07 18:45:51 - General Hunglow: you did start the round first, its only natural that you deploy before me, but you want to play that game then good
2009-09-07 18:48:07 - General Hunglow: yeah i should have looked at your rating before i even joined, i see why you're such a sourpuss
Really not natural for someone to know the stuff you pick up on later like looking at peoples ratings, already having a preference on who to play, and even the strategical gains on freestyle when only being a user for less then 2 weeks and only 18 games under his/her belt.
Plus in that game no mention at all was given to the accused of his name being in the Cheating & Abuse forum, it was said that he smelled like a multi and would get looked into. A new user doesnt usually know his/her way around the site enough to be able to respond to a cheating and abuse claim within a few hours of it being made..
King Sam
Posted: Mon Sep 07, 2009 5:59 pm