Page 1 of 1

Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy [busted]

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:49 am
by mbligh
Accused:

Mitchell_vp


The accused are suspected of:

Other: Attempting secret diplomacy

Game number(s):

Game 5479525
Game 5426018


Comments:

Sent the following email, which seems like a clear violation of secret diplomacy rules:



World Map

Sent: Wed Aug 26, 2009 6:04 am
From: Mitchell_vp
To: mbligh
Hey,

About that world 2.1 game we're playing. I think it'd be best if we stop attacking eachother. You can have South-America, and leave me North. It's either that or we'll get raped hard...
You can add terms if you want. If we can get to an agreement, I will post something about me not attacking you in the game.

Best regards,

Mitchell

Private 1st Class Mitchell_vp

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:22 am
by darkangelsguy205
he has not say anything so this a easliy a secret diplomacy
but if you responded whith anything to help u guys out in the game then u will be ban to

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 10:52 am
by jefjef
darkangelsguy205 wrote:he has not say anything so this a easliy a secret diplomacy
but if you responded whith anything to help u guys out in the game then u will be ban to

If he makes the deal in game chat it would be ok. But be sure not to respond via pm to this message. But this player will only be warned unless he has a history of it. Thanks to th OP for reporting this attempted cheat.

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 11:56 am
by jammyjames
mbligh wrote:Accused:
I will post something about me not attacking you in the game.

Best regards,

Mitchell


It is wrong to do this, he does look to have a slight bit of honour saying that he would post in game chat, however the PM would class as secret diplomacy to me, but only on his part, not entirely sure of the guidelines for this though...

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 4:04 pm
by sailorc
Why not discuss terms in the game chat? Is there some advantage using PMs or something?

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 6:18 pm
by jefjef
sailorc wrote:Why not discuss terms in the game chat? Is there some advantage using PMs or something?

The advantage of using pm's is called SECRET DIPLOMACY

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:39 pm
by sailorc
Mitchell_vp wrote:If we can get to an agreement, I will post something about me not attacking you in the game.

If your going to put it in the chat anyway, why not discuss your agreement in the chat? Isn't that one of the reasons its there? :roll:

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:50 pm
by Hsur
Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat.

You discuss it in the game chat so everyone else in the game is aware of a truce or a coordinated attack. If you do that at least it's not secret...........get it?

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 8:32 pm
by slowreactor
Let him off easy. He's a new player, probably not very familiar with the rules. Warn him to let him know.

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Wed Sep 02, 2009 9:52 pm
by Hsur
slowreactor wrote:Let him off easy. He's a new player, probably not very familiar with the rules. Warn him to let him know.



I agree.

Re: Mitchell_vp attempting secret diplomacy

PostPosted: Thu Sep 03, 2009 1:28 am
by king achilles
Mitchell_vp has been busted with Qhost.