Conquer Club

Accused:
pie12345

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis

Comments:
Not that I've ever lost against this guy but he plays fudeal way to well for a freemium corporal, clicky maps etc. Worth checking into.

Codeblue1018

tell me does this look like a multi

209 completed, 78 (37%) won
if i where a multi my wins would have 150 wouldent it\

sence my first one is much beter here it is

im not a multi so i have nothing to hide so report me it woulnt go throug

he's been here 4 months and has played 209 games... sometimes people get better. especially on a simple map like feudal that has a very few distinct strategies that everyone knows, and the luck of the drop mostly determines the game... ... i think you just got beat. every single time you get beat, it doesn't mean the person is a multi...-0

p.s.-nice edit, pie... your first response was far better...

thx owner

he is no multi

i know im not i have 2 brothers who play this game

codeblue1018 wrote:Accused:
pie12345

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis

Comments:
Not that I've ever lost against this guy but he plays fudeal way to well for a freemium corporal, clicky maps etc. Worth checking into.

Codeblue1018

sounds like you're just being a sore loser. Pie seems to have a fair bit of experience on this map(32 games). And are you saying premiums are the only players who should have clicky maps. Because if that's true then I guess I'm a multi as well

Accused:
codeblue1018


The accused are suspected of:
Other: Sore Loser


Game Numbers:
N/A


Comments:
Is totally paranoid and sees multi's coming out of the woodwork. Doesn't take losing too well either.

pie12345 wrote:tell me does this look like a multi

209 completed, 78 (37%) won
if i where a multi my wins would have 150 wouldent it\

sence my first one is much beter here it is

im not a multi so i have nothing to hide so report me it woulnt go throug

Well some multies suck. Thats why they cheat. And alot of multies use #s in their name for some reason. Nice flame artimis (good thing ya didn't call em an "assclown"

jefjef wrote:

pie12345 wrote:tell me does this look like a multi

209 completed, 78 (37%) won
if i where a multi my wins would have 150 wouldent it\

sence my first one is much beter here it is

im not a multi so i have nothing to hide so report me it woulnt go throug

Well some multies suck. Thats why they cheat. And alot of multies use #s in their name for some reason. Nice flame artimis (good thing ya didn't call em an "assclown"

dude i am not a multi, stop, jefjef

#1_stunna wrote:

jefjef wrote:

pie12345 wrote:tell me does this look like a multi

209 completed, 78 (37%) won
if i where a multi my wins would have 150 wouldent it\

sence my first one is much beter here it is

im not a multi so i have nothing to hide so report me it woulnt go throug

Well some multies suck. Thats why they cheat. And alot of multies use #s in their name for some reason. Nice flame artimis (good thing ya didn't call em an "assclown"

dude i am not a multi, stop, jefjef

I'm sorry. They tend to have more than one #. My multies always do.

And alot of multies use #s in their name for some reason

ur saying 1/2 of cc is a multi so dont say that

pie12345 wrote:

And alot of multies use #s in their name for some reason

ur saying 1/2 of cc is a multi so dont say that

Well 1/2 probably are. Now lighten up. Did ya not see me smile?

nope stoped reading to soon

if im to good for fedual look at this game i got killed

Game 5492758

Artimis wrote:Accused:
codeblue1018-a very big damn troll


The accused are suspected of:
Other: Sore Loser-no shit


Game Numbers:
N/A


Comments:
Is totally paranoid and sees multi's coming out of the woodwork. Doesn't take losing too well either.

pie12345 wrote:i know im not i have 2 brothers who play this game

Well, you do have to admit, Code picked up on the fact that he was playing the game better and faster than an ordinary player of 209 games. At the time, he could not have known that he was "coached" by one or two brothers that have also played.

Basically, the hunch was correct, that something was amiss, and that something did not make sense. In this case, it was because the player was coached, and presumably made aware of clickies by one or both of his brothers.

The accusation really wasnt far off. To some degree, pie was better than he probably should have been.

someone who post in this fourm knows who my brother is

If not a multi seems like undeclared account sitting..... Smells like multi.

BoganGod wrote:If not a multi seems like undeclared account sitting..... Smells like multi.

So i guess undeclared account sitting is ok for high ranks to do, but not for low ranks.

lt.pie wrote:

BoganGod wrote:If not a multi seems like undeclared account sitting..... Smells like multi.

So i guess undeclared account sitting is ok for high ranks to do, but not for low ranks.

Undeclared account sitting is fine of course, because there is no rule about saying it. I forget quite often myself to announce it.

However, sitting for tactical advantage is against the rules, which would certainly include having a brother play because he was faster, or because the timing of the move was better, and not because he was going to miss. It is in fact that situation, that was the inspiration for the babysitting rules in the first place.

In this case, pie123... has not mentioned that it was not him playing though. He hasnt said that it was actually his brother...he only said that it was his brothers that presumably taught him. Or, is it that code was right, and that someone else was making the moves. In that case, he was obviously right on in his accusation, and couldnt possibly be expected to know it happened to be a ...legal babysitter...especially since pie chatted with him in the game the whole time, and never mentioned anything about that possibility.

If another brother played, all he would have had to do was say, my bro wont be around for a day or two, so im making his moves, which is why im faster, and better than most 200 game players.

I have no idea what the situation is here, but certainly its not coincidence that code had a hunch someone else was playing an account, and it turns out two brothers theoretically could have been playing them, and at the very least, taught him how to play.

If it turned out, that only one IP and one account showed up with pie12345, then perhaps it was paranoid...but since 3 accounts will show up, it was hardly paranoid, and obviously its anyone's guess at this point what really happened.

But he started by saying he wasnt a multi, and then that he had brothers, and now the possibility of babysitting comes up... its obviously at least a little suspicious, and most of it could have been avoided with a little honesty from the beginning. The bogus post about Code somehow throwing the game doesnt help the matter either. I would suggest pies brother give him more advice about how to handle this situation, and to simply tell the truth and explain it, and certainly not make some silly accusations that really dont even make any sense whatsoever. Its really the only way in this situation.

codeblue1018 wrote:

FROM PIE: pie12345 wrote:non of ur buinsnies who my brothers are only 2 peole in cc know i will give u guys there user name once pie is cleared

FROM CODEBLUE1018: Then he speaks of himself in the third person; or is it that someone else is typing on behalf of pie? Nonetheless, clearly entertaining!



Copied and pasted from Pie's no basis complaint on me. Clearly someone is typing on behalf of Pie!

codeblue1018 wrote:codeblue1018 wrote:

FROM PIE: pie12345 wrote:non of ur buinsnies who my brothers are only 2 peole in cc know i will give u guys there user name once pie is cleared

FROM CODEBLUE1018: Then he speaks of himself in the third person; or is it that someone else is typing on behalf of pie? Nonetheless, clearly entertaining!



Copied and pasted from Pie's no basis complaint on me. Clearly someone is typing on behalf of Pie!

Well, to be fair, he could conceivably be talking about "pie" the username, as I might talk about "aafitz" in the third person...while I am aafitz... aafitz is not necessarily me, and Ill guess codeblue is not necessarily you. the username is essentially a character, and given his language, it would be an easy enough mistake to make.

Im far more curious why his brothers names are being kept secret. In this case, he should have posted them right away, and said "I am in fact better than youd expect. I was trained by my bro"...", and he showed me clickies, which is how i killed you.

Its the slow release of info, and the half truths that are making this harder to trust at face value. I am constantly amazed how kids do not realize that just telling the truth from the beginning will always be the best policy, and it is this secrecy and counter attacks that really make them look guilty.

At this point, im pretty convinced either one of the brothers was playing for him, or he is a multi all together, simply because of the way this has been handled. It just seems like there is a lot to hide, and its fairly obvious the only reason he was mentioning the brothers, was because an IP check was imminent. It never came up earlier, which may have prevented this entire accusation.

no iplayed the game true statement i am preaty fas are u saying that only high ranks can be fast because that is prety rasests or somthing like that


(found the word rankest)

pie12345 wrote:no iplayed the game true statement i am preaty fas are u saying that only high ranks can be fast because that is prety rasests or somthing like that


(found the word rankest)

Translation: No. I played the game and it is true that I am pretty fast. Are you saying that only those of high ranks can be fast? If so that is pretty racist.... NOW PIE how is that racist? Who are your brothers. It does matter. If you come clean now C C will go easy on you. If you don't come clean they will find out & you will be perma banned along with your brothers. Is that what you want?