Conquer Club

Accused:

blackwatch1
Sir_Isaac

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy




Game number(s):

Game 5484855

AND a lot more, just find them in Game Finder




Comments: They joined almost the same date, have played A LOT OF GAMES TOGETHER, always seem to join one after another, and in the game i was the victim, they always made moves that helped the other, basically blackwatch1, the higher ranked of the two. In a certain moment, green made a move that helped red a lot, and I went to look for games they played together, and I found 37.

i do play with sir_isaac a lot and i do know him but i play my own game. we are 3500 kms away . i dislike cheating as much as the next person. i know that sir_isaac was attacking yellow a lot because yellow said he didnt have a clue what he was doing. not the best move but... whatever. i attacked all players and i defended against all players when i had a defensible position. the game broke down half way through so i any strategy after that was thrown out the window.

HA.

After I said I had found out, he/they (blackwatch1 and Sir_Isaac) started attacking each other, and playing randomly. Before that, blackwatch1 attacked Sir_Isaac once, in 11 rounds.

The giveaway clue for me was when Sir_Isaac made a move that only benefited blackwatch1, and benefited him a lot.

sir_isaac didnt attack you either. tunnel vision on yellow.

scott free?

We would need more than one game of strong evidence with malicious plays involving the same players to warrant a disciplinary action. One game of suspected secret alliance does not necessarily dictates how they have played in their other past games too. If you feel they had a secret diplomacy in your game, feel free to leave the appropriate ratings for these players. For now this is noted for future reference.