Conquer Club

Accused:

Night Strike


The accused are suspected of:

Flaming


Comments:

Night Strike wrote:Pimpdave, you're a troll.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=94846&start=60#p2175843

This is a clear and obvious flame. While mpjh was just an example of how friendly banter can be misconstrued into an offense that isn't one, this is clear and obvious flaming.

I am being called a name. That is flaming. Please ban Night Strike for at least 24 hours, although 3 days is more fitting. He is not fit to be a moderator nor based on precedent and community guidelines is he fit to post in the fora without a banishment of some kind.

Please treat him as he has treated us.

It is only a flame if it is not true.

I am being called a name. That is flaming. Please ban Night Strike for at least 24 hours, although 3 days is more fitting. He is not fit to be a moderator nor based on precedent and community guidelines is he fit to post in the fora without a banishment of some kind.

Please treat him as he has treated us.

I know that sometimes people on Conquer Club, especially the staffs, are not very reasonable. But you should think like this. He is a staff, can you accuse him so easily?

I would have to say it's more of a blatant flame-bait than flame itself; as he disguised trying to get you to go off on him through a comment that can or cannot be taken as direct flaming. Obviously, flame-baiting is also a violation of the TOC as stated on the guidelines page. As I've learned through experience, however, only certain member must abide by those guidelines. Other members are free to run around, baiting every other post (even creating posts that encourage nothing along the lines of conversation!), without so much as a slap on the wrists.

Perfect example? A post, created with an incredibly childish insult in the TITLE (there you go mods- you don't even have to READ it; it's ALREADY a flame!), is reported and immediately closed. However, the SAME post is locked for violation of the TOC by a different moderator than the one who closed the report days after it was considered 'closed'.

Here's an idea: GET ON THE SAME PAGE. You want us to stay in line? Try not having entirely different standards with regards to individuals (not) being able to break the TOC and get away with it. Especially, don't crawl up one user's ass and warn/ban him for doing the SAME thing when another user's thread won't even get locked.

mpjh wrote:It is only a flame if it is not true.

Bull Shit. I got a warning for stating truth. What you are really saying is it's only a flame if it's directed at the wrong people or posted by the wrong player. I would start throwing around the word "assclown" but that is not allowed so I won't.

jefjef wrote:

mpjh wrote:It is only a flame if it is not true.

Bull Shit. I got a warning for stating truth. What you are really saying is it's only a flame if it's directed at the wrong people or posted by the wrong player. I would start throwing around the word "assclown" but that is not allowed so I won't.

Thanks for backing me up, I was about to call bullshit on it too. Besides which, I'm not a troll, so Night Strike's a _________ for saying that. But OOOOOH will I be banned now?

Seriously, mods. Enough is enough. Do you want us to renew premium or not? Do you want us to start telling our friends about this website again or not? Do you want us to try to help you grow or to resent you taking our money and then spitting in our faces?

pimpdave wrote:

jefjef wrote:

mpjh wrote:It is only a flame if it is not true.

Bull Shit. I got a warning for stating truth. What you are really saying is it's only a flame if it's directed at the wrong people or posted by the wrong player. I would start throwing around the word "assclown" but that is not allowed so I won't.

Thanks for backing me up, I was about to call bullshit it on it too.

Seriously, mods. Enough is enough. Do you want us to renew premium or not? Do you want us to start telling our friends about this website again or not? Do you want us to try to help you grow or to resent you taking our money and then spitting in our faces?

tbh they have already made it clear that a bunch of people not renewing premium wont bother them....
and calling someone a troll is not a flame...esp when a) they are a mod b) you are a troll...c) a tampon should fix your pms

I AGREE WITH THE POST STARTER! AT FIRST I WAS BLOCKED BECAUSE OF THE TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OF CONQUER CLUB, SEVERAL FRIENDS AND I WERE JUST PLAYING USING THE SCHOOL NETWORK, AND THEY THINK WE WERE THE SAME PERSON. SO I OPEN ANOTHER ACCOUNT, AND THEY BLOCK ME AND MY FRIENDS AGAIN! SHAME ON CONQUER CLUB. TELL ALL THE PEOPLE TO LEAVE THIS COMMUNITY. THIS IS NOT DEMOCRATIC! SHAME ON CONQUER CLUB. YOU NEVER BLOCK YOUR STAFFS. ALSO I FOUND A SIMILAR CASE THAT IS CLEARED. RIXILEND AND 7oo ARE CLEARED BUT I AM NOT. WHY? BECAUSE CC IS SHAMEFUL! SHAMEFUL!

I WARN YOU NOT TO BLOCK ME AND DELETE THIS POST!

Here he is flame baiting more people with incredibly biased modlike altruism.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=94711&start=135

Night Strike wrote:I find it ironic that the first two people to complain about the freestyle fix going first are two of those who frequently use the very same double turn people have complained about. Makes it sound like lack picked well.

shame on CC wrote:I AGREE WITH THE POST STARTER! AT FIRST I WAS BLOCKED BECAUSE OF THE TECHNICAL PROBLEMS OF CONQUER CLUB, SEVERAL FRIENDS AND I WERE JUST PLAYING USING THE SCHOOL NETWORK, AND THEY THINK WE WERE THE SAME PERSON. SO I OPEN ANOTHER ACCOUNT, AND THEY BLOCK ME AND MY FRIENDS AGAIN! SHAME ON CONQUER CLUB. TELL ALL THE PEOPLE TO LEAVE THIS COMMUNITY. THIS IS NOT DEMOCRATIC! SHAME ON CONQUER CLUB. YOU NEVER BLOCK YOUR STAFFS.

I WARN YOU NOT TO BLOCK ME AND DELETE THIS POST!

Well hello multi. this is funny. luv it. and as far as lord whoever - your tampon remark is a flame.

lord voldemort wrote:and calling someone a troll is not a flame...esp when a) they are a mod b) you are a troll...c) a tampon should fix your pms

Oh yeah; that's not a blatant (not to mention idiotic and childish) flame/troll/flamebait I'm 150% sure will remain untouched because it helps you to properly kiss the right (pun very, very much so intended) asses.

This is exactly what we're talking about. Thanks for the relevant, real-time example voldemort.

lgoasklucyl wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:and calling someone a troll is not a flame...esp when a) they are a mod b) you are a troll...c) a tampon should fix your pms

Oh yeah; that's not a blatant (not to mention idiotic and childish) flame/troll/flamebait I'm 150% sure will remain untouched because it helps you to properly kiss the right (pun very, very much so intended) asses.

This is exactly what we're talking about. Thanks for the relevant, real-time example voldemort.

im quite aware its a flame...and am willing to cop my warning like i should.
i dont need to kiss any arses..see i dont give a crap about who is flaming who or the double standards or anything of the sort.
this place isnt a democracy its a business and they can do what ever the hell they like.....

lord voldemort wrote:

lgoasklucyl wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:and calling someone a troll is not a flame...esp when a) they are a mod b) you are a troll...c) a tampon should fix your pms

Oh yeah; that's not a blatant (not to mention idiotic and childish) flame/troll/flamebait I'm 150% sure will remain untouched because it helps you to properly kiss the right (pun very, very much so intended) asses.

This is exactly what we're talking about. Thanks for the relevant, real-time example voldemort.

im quite aware its a flame...and am willing to cop my warning like i should.
i dont need to kiss any arses..see i dont give a crap about who is flaming who or the double standards or anything of the sort.
this place isnt a democracy its a business and they can do what ever the hell they like.....

Yes they can do what they want. It is a biz. But if a biz wants to grow & earn more profit it should be even handed & have specific rules that apply to all. I find it funny & sad that you or anyone would support double standards.

lord voldemort wrote:im quite aware its a flame...and am willing to cop my warning like i should.
i dont need to kiss any arses..see i dont give a crap about who is flaming who or the double standards or anything of the sort.
this place isnt a democracy its a business and they can do what ever the hell they like.....

Yeah... you don't care so much that you need to make everyone else's business (of course, business regarding blatant double standards) your own. I can feel the apathy.

edit:

Not only do you make it your own business (despite your 'lack of caring'...), but also feel inclined to make your own thread bitching about it just seconds later: http://www.conquerclub.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=95095&start=0

if you actually comprehended the thread im bitching about everyone else always complaining ie this thread and the countless others in gd, c&a and s&b

@jetjef...i think they (teamCC) have made it quite clear where they stand...heck even lack showed his face in an unban dm thread.
what im saying is just get over it..move on

Yo, I'll get over it if I've got some kind of guarantee they won't permanently ban me if I happen to accidentally piss someone off or, while rather drunk, tell someone they are a poopy face dum-dum head.

I mean, honestly. I'll gladly edit it out later if they just tell me I was being a jerk-off. I'll even send a PM apology to the aggrieved.

pimpdave wrote:Yo, I'll get over it if I've got some kind of guarantee they won't permanently ban me if I happen to accidentally piss someone off or, while rather drunk, tell someone they are a poopy face dum-dum head.

I mean, honestly.

why would u come to the computer when your drunk...
usually when people drink they do it at social gatherings with friends...why on earth would u then jump on a computer
its like when people update facebook when they are out in clubs,...surely you could be having fun without the ned for the inter highway

lord voldemort wrote:if you actually comprehended the thread im bitching about everyone else always complaining ie this thread and the countless others in gd, c&a and s&b

You're bitching about others bitching? Some may call that hypocrisy. Others, however, may simply suggest you invest in punctuation so people don't have to read your sentences three or four times to have some semblance of an idea as to what the hell you are trying to say.

lgoasklucyl wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:if you actually comprehended the thread im bitching about everyone else always complaining ie this thread and the countless others in gd, c&a and s&b

You're bitching about others bitching? Some may call that hypocrisy. Others, however, may simply suggest you invest in punctuation so people don't have to read your sentences three or four times to have some semblance of an idea as to what the hell you are trying to say.

oh so you dont have a real argument you just take a shot at my grammer...its no secret i suck at it

Of course I support CC but not the post-starter of this thread. Because they did not block me for being multi with ronc8649! Firstly because I get along well with the admins (like what shame on cc says, CC staffs are shameful, and I get along well with them, so I was not blocked!

lord voldemort wrote:if you actually comprehended the thread im bitching about everyone else always complaining ie this thread and the countless others in gd, c&a and s&b

@jetjef...i think they (teamCC) have made it quite clear where they stand...heck even lack showed his face in an unban dm thread.
what im saying is just get over it..move on

Well lord whoever I have nothing to get over. There is a double standard. There are those of us willing to call an assclown an assclown. Sure it's there right to run C C as they see fit. But I view it as my right as a paying customer not to be lead like a sheep & kicked like a dog by those that have no mirrors.

pimpdave wrote:Accused:

Night Strike


The accused are suspected of:

Flaming


Comments:

Night Strike wrote:Pimpdave, you're a troll.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=94846&start=60#p2175843

This is a clear and obvious flame. While mpjh was just an example of how friendly banter can be misconstrued into an offense that isn't one, this is clear and obvious flaming.

I am being called a name. That is flaming. Please ban Night Strike for at least 24 hours, although 3 days is more fitting. He is not fit to be a moderator nor based on precedent and community guidelines is he fit to post in the fora without a banishment of some kind.

Please treat him as he has treated us.

All things considered, I see you as a troll myself. NS was merely telling you so that you would hopefully straighten up and not get yourself banned, at least, that was the way I read it. And quite frankly, name-calling? Being called what you make half of your posts out to be until someone (whom you have never liked, might I add) points it out and then demand "retribution?" The hell? If someone was banned for everytime they called someone else a name that they didn't like (even if it fit them quite well in your case), nearly half the site would have been banned by now. Especially "troll." And those supporting you are the fanboys of every person that has been perma-banned, and so they have grievances with most of the staff.

lord voldemort wrote:

lgoasklucyl wrote:

lord voldemort wrote:if you actually comprehended the thread im bitching about everyone else always complaining ie this thread and the countless others in gd, c&a and s&b

You're bitching about others bitching? Some may call that hypocrisy. Others, however, may simply suggest you invest in punctuation so people don't have to read your sentences three or four times to have some semblance of an idea as to what the hell you are trying to say.

oh so you dont have a real argument you just take a shot at my grammer...its no secret i suck at it

The argument was the first half of the sentence: you're a blatant hypocrite who needs to mind his own business and quit posting in threads when he has nothing positive to contribute; especially when you're going to flame in a cheating and abuse thread on flaming.

Point-case. It was stated in the last comment, but apparently you really need things spelled out for you.

muy_thaiguy wrote:

pimpdave wrote:Accused:

Night Strike


The accused are suspected of:

Flaming


Comments:

Night Strike wrote:Pimpdave, you're a troll.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=94846&start=60#p2175843

This is a clear and obvious flame. While mpjh was just an example of how friendly banter can be misconstrued into an offense that isn't one, this is clear and obvious flaming.

I am being called a name. That is flaming. Please ban Night Strike for at least 24 hours, although 3 days is more fitting. He is not fit to be a moderator nor based on precedent and community guidelines is he fit to post in the fora without a banishment of some kind.

Please treat him as he has treated us.

All things considered, I see you as a troll myself. NS was merely telling you so that you would hopefully straighten up and not get yourself banned, at least, that was the way I read it. And quite frankly, name-calling? Being called what you make half of your posts out to be until someone (whom you have never liked, might I add) points it out and then demand "retribution?" The hell? If someone was banned for everytime they called someone else a name that they didn't like (even if it fit them quite well in your case), nearly half the site would have been banned by now. Especially "troll." And those supporting you are the fanboys of every person that has been perma-banned, and so they have grievances with most of the staff.

WRONG. I was glad to see DM go.

This topic has unfortunately evolved into a spamathon.

Pimpdave, if you have a problem with a Team CC member, first contact the Team CC member via PM and try to resolve the issue.

If that is unsatisfactory, please contact Optimus Prime, as he is our Operations Manager and Volunteer Coordinator. Via E-ticket would be the best, through the General Inquiries Dept.

If you take the appropriate measures in the appropriate paths, you can get your voice heard.


--Andy