Conquer Club

Accused:

Neoteny

The accused are suspected of:

Other: Unnecessary Flaming via feeback response

http://www.conquerclub.com/player.php?m ... me=Neoteny

Comments: Not sure why it is necessary to flame via response, especially since players gave good ratings to him. Appears to be a pattern and this player has been previously warned several times about flaming. I will withdraw the rating if need be, but this should be dealt with first.

LOL...

Response: This cunt sucks more cock than the rest of Bangkok combined.

This could have been meant as a compliment you know...

I suspect that the people who left the ratings changed them to make neoteny look bad.

slowreactor wrote:I suspect that the people who left the ratings changed them to make neoteny look bad.

1. He beat me twice and did it well. My rating is an original 5 star. The ratings are recent so they are unlikely changed for that purpose.
2. Neoteny makes himself look bad, I don't need to change a rating. Nor would I make the effort to replay someone I poorly rated, to then mark up the rating to a 5-star.

alstergren wrote:LOL...

Response: This cunt sucks more cock than the rest of Bangkok combined.

This could have been meant as a compliment you know...

Cunt is never a compliment.

I'm guessing he just lost it recently since most of the responses are on the most recent page, he went freemium recently and is taking the infamous way out rather than just not playing.

Neoteny is a sweetheart who wouldn't hurt a fly. Just pour him a mug of hot chocolate and sit him down on your armchair in front of your great oak fire and engage him in some amicable conversation.

Hahaha! Some of those are priceless!

neoteny's response to an all 5's rating wrote:HEY FUCK YOU BUDDY!!! How fucking dare you! My gameplay sucked balls!!1!!

More to the point though, I see this as similar to wall "abuse". You can easily remove the comment, by removing the rating. This is all, quite obviously, tongue-in-cheek, and is an issue that could have been resolved privately. I don't see any need for this thread.

jpcloet wrote:

alstergren wrote:LOL...

Response: This cunt sucks more cock than the rest of Bangkok combined.

This could have been meant as a compliment you know...

Cunt is never a compliment.

I'm guessing he just lost it recently since most of the responses are on the most recent page, he went freemium recently and is taking the infamous way out rather than just not playing.

Of all the "infamous" ways of going, this is a pretty lame one lol. Perhaps it is meant as a crude form of humour?

slowreactor wrote:I suspect that the people who left the ratings changed them to make neoteny look bad.

A quick check at the ratings show that the majority of ratings refer to an account that Neoteny has only played one game with/against. Other than that it's two or three games, and a bried overview indicates that the oldest games were archived before Neoteny issued the responses. In light of this, your comment doesn't make sense. Feel free to provide input on the pros or cons of a report, but I don't understand why people throw out a "defence" without any kind of factual backing. This statement of yours is pure crap and doesn't contribute to anything. (And yes, I'm aware of the fact that I posted an off-topic comment, but at least that could be defended as potentially slightly humorous, your comment has no defense what so ever as to its uselessness.)

Wow, you mods sure are sensitive. This is something he obviously just recently started to enjoy as an added means of entertainment(5-6 occurrences, all on the latest page). You blow it into the next dimension of proportion and expect people to actually take your side rather than laugh? Somebody give this guy a hug.

Neoteny in his comment on ender33's rating wrote:Response: This rating is manifestly unfair

I agree with Neoteny, there was no way he deserved five stars in all categories for that game.




*hugs jpcloet* There, there. It'll all be alright. Just pm Neo and ask him to modify his comment on your rating.

He left out the last part. I hate quote mining, so let me illustrate what was fully said.

Neoteny wrote:This cunt sucks more cock than the rest of Bangkok combined. Also, he's a homo. With no penis.

Clearly a flame. I suppose I do have a history of flaming, but I am willing to withdraw any comments that might be found to be offensive. I'd rather get banned for flaming in the forums than for misusing this travesty of a rating system.

Seriously, it's retarded.

Is it against the rules to flame the rating system itself?

Anyhow, I hope the one about my gameplay being total shit can be left up. I rather like that one.

and now he jumps into the bigotry fold, by his own admission... sigh...-0

I think I could probably be ok with being banned for bigotry. That is a valid complaint.

Neoteny wrote:I think I could probably be ok with being banned for bigotry. That is a valid complaint.

I do appreciate the honesty.

jpcloet wrote:

Neoteny wrote:I think I could probably be ok with being banned for bigotry. That is a valid complaint.

I do appreciate the honesty.

I do try to avoid dishonesty. It's the being an asshole part I have trouble avoiding...

Looking at that avi... it's obvious he's tickling his own fancy
way too much.

slowreactor wrote:I suspect that the people who left the ratings changed them to make neoteny look bad.

I find that unlikely, personally.

Timminz wrote:Hahaha! Some of those are priceless!

neoteny's response to an all 5's rating wrote:HEY FUCK YOU BUDDY!!! How fucking dare you! My gameplay sucked balls!!1!!

More to the point though, I see this as similar to wall "abuse". You can easily remove the comment, by removing the rating. This is all, quite obviously, tongue-in-cheek, and is an issue that could have been resolved privately. I don't see any need for this thread.

So then you suggest that if someone wants the 1-star ratings against them removed, they should simply flame them in the response to get it removed? Because that appears to be what you're suggesting.

Seriously, this thread is fucking awesome.

Timminz wrote:I don't see any need for this thread.

and yet,

Snorri1234 wrote:Seriously, this thread is fucking awesome.

Just another example of this mod mod edit - flaming again, being a compete mod edit - flaming and mod edit - flaming. Seriously, I wish jp would mod edit - flaming. Like, right now, you mod edit - flaming.

And now I'll probably get my second ban. Thanks, jpcloet!

This is the best thread of the month.

slowreactor wrote:I suspect that the people who left the ratings changed them to make neoteny look bad.

I don't think that's even possible. Once someone responds to a rating, your only option is to withdraw it, or replay them and re-rate. If you re-rate them, I believe the response goes away.

This complaint amuses me as do the subsequent posts. I was going to foe jpcloet after reading the first post, but changed my mind when I got further down the thread. Instead I'm going to do this...

*Hugs jpcloet*

"There, there, it'll all be better soon."