Conquer Club

5416175

or is the norm to abuse you opponent?

I don't know what a "theat" is. But it looks like he/she didn't like that you joined his/her game and then left. Which is his/her choice to leave a negative rating for. Also, is this an accusation or what? With your question there I suppose it belongs in GD or Q&A, this certainly doesn't look like a complaint, just a complainer.

The best advice I can give you Bill is to just ignore it. Dont worry about your rating, its bollocks anyway. You'll come across worse than that if you stick around any length of time. This place is full of arseholes.

Strife wrote:I don't know what a "theat" is. But it looks like he/she didn't like that you joined his/her game and then left. Which is his/her choice to leave a negative rating for.

I'm sorry, but that's a crock of crap. Leaving a negative rating for not playing immediately in a CASUAL GAME? Ridiculous.

If Caenwyr is that bothered by someone CASUALLY playing a CASUAL GAME, then he should buy premium so he can play speed games.

Woodruff wrote:

Strife wrote:I don't know what a "theat" is. But it looks like he/she didn't like that you joined his/her game and then left. Which is his/her choice to leave a negative rating for.

I'm sorry, but that's a crock of crap. Leaving a negative rating for not playing immediately in a CASUAL GAME? Ridiculous.

If Caenwyr is that bothered by someone CASUALLY playing a CASUAL GAME, then he should buy premium so he can play speed games.

I'm not saying it isn't, but it's the players choice to rate down for whatever they feel necessary. Even when I had premium I would be rather angry if someone joined my game but didn't take their turn, what's the point of joining a game and not taking your turn(Those were FB days though, a much simpler time)?

Strife wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

Strife wrote:I don't know what a "theat" is. But it looks like he/she didn't like that you joined his/her game and then left. Which is his/her choice to leave a negative rating for.

I'm sorry, but that's a crock of crap. Leaving a negative rating for not playing immediately in a CASUAL GAME? Ridiculous.

If Caenwyr is that bothered by someone CASUALLY playing a CASUAL GAME, then he should buy premium so he can play speed games.

I'm not saying it isn't, but it's the players choice to rate down for whatever they feel necessary. Even when I had premium I would be rather angry if someone joined my game but didn't take their turn, what's the point of joining a game and not taking your turn(Those were FB days though, a much simpler time)?

I would consider that ratings abuse, personally (that's not to say the site would rule that way, of course). It's giving a poor rating for following the rules.

1) Toughen up and grow a thicker skin.

2) You're foed, thank you and good night!

Regardless whether he is actually going to do what he said or not, I would suggest that you still continue with the game and/or ignore what he said. The next player could make another 'threat' or curse, or say something to make you feel guilty, what would be the next course of action? I suggest that you play your game the next time around. You can also put him in your foes list so you won't be bothered with whatever he says in the game chat once again.

Woodruff wrote:I'm sorry, but that's a crock of crap. Leaving a negative rating for not playing immediately in a CASUAL GAME? Ridiculous.

Unfortunately it's fully allowed to rate that way. Just another clear sign that the current rating system is completely useless and counter productive.

king achilles wrote:I suggest that you play your game the next time around.

You mind explaining what you mean by that?