Conquer Club

Accused:

The Antagonist


The accused are suspected of:

Severe PM Abuse
Other: The Antagonist is clearly slandering me in a feudal wars game. He accuses me of being a multi just because I took one of his castles. I really don't think that it's fair how someone can be accused just because they're winning in a game that they never played.

Through an IP check, you can find my brother's account u9q5. I don't think he plays feudal wars games either. We usually stick with classic or city mogul maps. (even though one of us usually gets eliminated by our opponents in the first few turns XP) I've seen some other accusations made by the Antagonist. He claimed that another player with BOB was kicking his butt and was a noob, but it's obvious that the antagonist's strategy isn't up to par and if he expects to only play noobs that cannot beat him, then he really shouldn't play online where anyone can join his game.



Game number(s):

Game 5319919




Comments:

qwertyytrewq wrote:Accused:

The Antagonist
The accused are suspected of:
Severe PM Abuse
Other: The Antagonist is clearly slandering me in a feudal wars game. He accuses me of being a multi just because I took one of his castles. I really don't think that it's fair how someone can be accused just because they're winning in a game that they never played.
Through an IP check, you can find my brother's account u9q5. I don't think he plays feudal wars games either. We usually stick with classic or city mogul maps. (even though one of us usually gets eliminated by our opponents in the first few turns XP) I've seen some other accusations made by the Antagonist. He claimed that another player with BOB was kicking his butt and was a noob, but it's obvious that the antagonist's strategy isn't up to par and if he expects to only play noobs that cannot beat him, then he really shouldn't play online where anyone can join his game.
Game number(s):
Game 5319919
Comments:

Interestingly, you speak in that game of having a "friend" with an account here, yet in this post, you speak of your brother's account. As well, you speak of just "creating a multi with another email address" if you get caught (which wouldn't help you any, for what it's worth). Perhaps The Antagonist isn't the only one to check into...

qwertyytrewq wrote:Accused:

The Antagonist


The accused are suspected of:

Severe PM Abuse
Other: The Antagonist is clearly slandering me in a feudal wars game. He accuses me of being a multi just because I took one of his castles. I really don't think that it's fair how someone can be accused just because they're winning in a game that they never played.

Through an IP check, you can find my brother's account u9q5. I don't think he plays feudal wars games either. We usually stick with classic or city mogul maps. (even though one of us usually gets eliminated by our opponents in the first few turns XP) I've seen some other accusations made by the Antagonist. He claimed that another player with BOB was kicking his butt and was a noob, but it's obvious that the antagonist's strategy isn't up to par and if he expects to only play noobs that cannot beat him, then he really shouldn't play online where anyone can join his game.



Game number(s):

Game 5319919




Comments:

this is a multi bust him

The Antagonist is a good feudal player, so someone with only a few feudal games under their belt is saying The Antagonist has flawed strategy........ qwertyytrewq you smell like a multi, and not a very good one, as you can't work out whether it is your brother or your friend that plays with you/is you/shares your IP address, going on your record in game chats and posts.

u9q5 needs to be looked at with this uh qwerty fellow. Antagonist is involved in a FEUDAL game with this one right now.

Put him on your foes list so that he won't be able to join in your games again. You can also follow the steps from the link below on how to filter messages coming from people on your foes list.

viewtopic.php?f=57&t=48225