Conquer Club

Accused:

PKeough
Saxitoxin



The accused are suspected of:

Other: In a game I played, both threatened to suicide into whoever attacked them. When I protested at that reasoning, both took action in support of their threats despite my having not attacked.



Game number(s):

Game 5241422


:From the Chat:
2009-07-11 21:18:55 - PKeough: first to try and take me out recieves the remainder of all my forces
2009-07-11 21:19:56 - PatriceB: would that be as an ally? or an enemy?
2009-07-11 21:21:33 - PKeough: first to try and destroy me receives the brunt of the rest of my forces
2009-07-11 21:29:41 - PKeough: i am redirecting all my remaining forces upon the agressor

Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by myself and the other player.

PatriceB wrote:Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.

When/if you foed him, it hides his game chat.

2009-07-11 22:29:17 - saxitoxin: In fact, I'll go so far as to say anyone who retaliates against one of my attacks I'll respond by suiciding themself against them.

.44

PatriceB wrote:Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.

Patrice...did you happen to foe Saxitoxin? You see, when you foe someone, their game-chat is cleared out of your view. It's still THERE...but you can't see it. So if you unfoe him, you'll see it again, I suspect.

PatriceB wrote:Accused:

PKeough
Saxitoxin



The accused are suspected of:

Other: In a game I played, both threatened to suicide into whoever attacked them. When I protested at that reasoning, both took action in support of their threats despite my having not attacked.



Game number(s):

Game 5241422


:From the Chat:
2009-07-11 21:18:55 - PKeough: first to try and take me out recieves the remainder of all my forces
2009-07-11 21:19:56 - PatriceB: would that be as an ally? or an enemy?
2009-07-11 21:21:33 - PKeough: first to try and destroy me receives the brunt of the rest of my forces
2009-07-11 21:29:41 - PKeough: i am redirecting all my remaining forces upon the agressor

Saxitoxin declared straight-out that he would suicide into whoever attacked him, but somehow that was deleted from the chat and I can no longer access it. In the chat, all of his discussion was removed, which is evident from what is left by other players.

Can't speak for PKeough but I can speak for myself:

(1) I don't have the technical know-how to go back and "edit" chats.

(2) The one potential comment Patrice might take issue with that hasn't been "edited out" of the chat is this:

saxitoxin: In fact, I'll go so far as to say anyone who retaliates against one of my attacks I'll respond by suiciding themself against them.

note I did not say I was suiciding myself, I said "suiciding themself against them" - in other words, defeating anyone who tries to suicide against me ... I hope we can use the word "suicide" with an occasional spirit of levity in-game chat without having someone with articles stuck up inside their body cavity taking everything with grim-faced, stone-like seriousness

finally, I won the game so obviously there was no "suicide" going on by me

Yes, I did foe him. Thank you both very much.

PatriceB wrote:Yes, I did foe him. Thank you both very much.

BTW - I friended Patrice because I think a foe is a friend you just don't know well enough.

I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

The real crime here is PatriceB being a sore loser, whining, and generally acting like a gigantic pussy.

I have no further words for the court. The defense rests.

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.

Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.

Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.

Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.

Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

It would seem you don't like it from the other side.

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.

Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.

Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

It would seem you don't like it from the other side.

I don't have a problem with it. I am only, as always, concerned about facilitating a proactive and cooperative atmosphere for the mods. Having a bunch of lookey-loos jump in doesn't help jurisprudence.

You'll find out about jurisprudence soon.

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!

saxitoxin wrote:No problem with it at all. Just don't like it from the other side if it's coming from a mere school marm, uppity as she may be. She needs to learn her place.

It would appear that you don't understand the various place-settings enough to comment accurately on it.

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.

Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.

Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

It would seem you don't like it from the other side.

I don't have a problem with it. I am only, as always, concerned about facilitating a proactive and cooperative atmosphere for the mods. Having a bunch of lookey-loos jump in doesn't help jurisprudence.
You'll find out about jurisprudence soon.

Interesting how you've changed your quote once I quoted it showing you just how bad it looked. Your dishonesty and lying knows no bounds!

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!

Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it! Woodruff, you tickle my feathers endlessly! Never stop being you! Love ya' Woodsie!


Woodruff At Work

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

Flaming is not permitted in these forums hypocrite.
I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!

Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it! Woodruff, you tickle my feathers endlessly! Never stop being you! Love ya' Woodsie!


Woodruff At Work

Edit: quoted so they can't edit the flame out again.

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

PKeough wrote:I simply stated in words what anyone would do in the same situation in our game...as for our "suicide", it was in fact Patrice who did this very action, whereas Saxitoxin were simply joking about it. The game was in a stalemate...therefore any aggressive action could be construed as suicide.

That is quite simply not true. There are any number of aggressive actions that would not be considered suicide.

Woodruff, you silly old school marm. Mind your own business and get your generous rear end out of ours.
Patrice presented her case. I presented mine. PKeough presented his.
Let the mods review and abjure the situation. Stop trying to be the uninvited arbitrator.

I'm not uninvited...in fact, YOU invited me when you posted it in this public forum. And thank you for inviting me!

Woodruff, you silly old school marm - Patrice posted it!

You're right...she did. It shouldn't have been hard for me to tell, I guess...given that you've started so many ridiculous threads in this forum that I should have realized this non-ridiculous one couldn't possibly have been started by you.

I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").

Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:

I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.

During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.

saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").

Of course the only reason you've said this is because it was quoted before you could get rid of it...

saxitoxin wrote:Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.

No.

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.

No.

reported for trolling

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.

No.

reported for trolling

How very ironic.

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.

No.

reported for trolling

How very ironic.

reported for flaming

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:I would like to take this opportunity to apologize for a, potentially, incendiary comment I made about userid Woodruff. While I did intend to make the comment, I meant to post it in a thread and forum other than this, and posted it here by mistake (it was meant for "General Discussion").
Woodruff and Other Problem Posters:
I politely ask the mods be given a chance to adjudicate this case without interference.
During a court session, Woodruff, would you run into the middle of a witnesses testimony screaming like a madman? You're doing a virtual version of that here. Please allow the mods to consider the two sides without editorial comments from the peanut gallery. Thanks.

No.

reported for trolling

How very ironic.

reported for flaming

How very laughable.

Reported for making me laugh.

It would seem that the troll has taken it's course, much like a hurricane that blew itself out, it is too weak to go on. All ground that it stood on has collapsed and they are now standing on air. The only thing we are slightly guilty of is feeding you, the troll.

Get a life Woodruff

PKeough wrote:Get a life Woodruff

I have no need for two of them, but thanks for the suggestion.