Conquer Club

Strife wrote:Accused:

Saxitoxin



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis(Possibly)
Other: <Explanation> This person is bashing our community. They also claim to reserve the right to have sexual online encounters. They are trolling and spamming the forums to no ends. Something tells me that in game solicitation is or should be against the rules. A light way to put it is they are a Troll, very light mind you.



Game number(s) Thread(s):

Game 5241259
Idea for New Way to Deal with Players Abusive in Chat
Creating a Culture of Tolerance and Diversity on CC
(Several posts in other topics)

Comments: They are extremely annoying and seem to think they are in some place in which they can have their fantasy world come true. Unfortunately myself and most likely other people don't wish to have "cyber sexing" with them and also don't want to be bothered by such a nuisance. I feel sexual solicitation is highly inappropriate for a RISK gaming community, unless lack would like to make this a giant orgy.

Strife wrote:Accused:

Saxitoxin



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis(Possibly)
Other: <Explanation> This person is bashing our community. They also claim to reserve the right to have sexual online encounters. They are trolling and spamming the forums to no ends. Something tells me that in game solicitation is or should be against the rules. A light way to put it is they are a Troll, very light mind you.



Game number(s) Thread(s):

Game 5241259
Idea for New Way to Deal with Players Abusive in Chat
Creating a Culture of Tolerance and Diversity on CC
(Several posts in other topics)

Comments: They are extremely annoying and seem to think they are in some place in which they can have their fantasy world come true. Unfortunately myself and most likely other people don't wish to have "cyber sexing" with them and also don't want to be bothered by such a nuisance. I feel sexual solicitation is highly inappropriate for a RISK gaming community, unless lack would like to make this a giant orgy.

Strife wrote: Unfortunately myself and most likely other people don't wish to have "cyber sexing" with them and also don't want to be bothered by such a nuisance.

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:Accused:

Saxitoxin



The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis(Possibly)
Other: <Explanation> This person is bashing our community. They also claim to reserve the right to have sexual online encounters. They are trolling and spamming the forums to no ends. Something tells me that in game solicitation is or should be against the rules. A light way to put it is they are a Troll, very light mind you.



Game number(s) Thread(s):

Game 5241259
Idea for New Way to Deal with Players Abusive in Chat
Creating a Culture of Tolerance and Diversity on CC
(Several posts in other topics)

Comments: They are extremely annoying and seem to think they are in some place in which they can have their fantasy world come true. Unfortunately myself and most likely other people don't wish to have "cyber sexing" with them and also don't want to be bothered by such a nuisance. I feel sexual solicitation is highly inappropriate for a RISK gaming community, unless lack would like to make this a giant orgy.

This person is bashing our community.

WRONG. Supporting the mods is not "bashing" the community.
viewtopic.php?f=6&t=91709

They also claim to reserve the right to have sexual online encounters.

WRONG. I have said I am responding to previously instigated abuse in-game chat with my own abuse which tends to take a sexual tone. We have been told - time and time again - that there are no language restrictions in chat. If someone tells me to go "F yourself" and "you are a F'ing idiot", then I reserve the right to to abusive with abuse and I have chosen amorous language. As has been said time and time again, don't complain about language.

hey are trolling and spamming the forums to no ends.

WRONG. I have made less than 50 posts in 2 weeks, or approximately 3 per day. You have made slightly more than 2,000 posts in 2 years, or approximately 2.2 per day. You disagree with my comments, I get it, but it's laughable to suggest a 0.8 post ratio difference equals "spamming."

Something tells me that in game solicitation is or should be against the rules.

WRONG. (4 for 4) It is not in-game solicitation anymore than telling someone to "go die" is in-game murder. Keep trying.

Strife wrote:How is saying the community a bad place supporting the mods?

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:How is saying the community a bad place supporting the mods?

Provide a link to where I said that or close this thread.

Thanks, strife!

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:How is saying the community a bad place supporting the mods?

Provide a link to where I said that or close this thread.

Thanks, strife!

I did, there are two of them in my first post, and I will most definitely not close the thread. Oh, did you know that Sexual Solicitation of a Minor is a federal crime? Just thought you should know in case the person you wanted to have sex with is a minor. I bet you didn't know that, it's a shame really. You better hope that the person you sent such explicit messages to isn't a minor and doesn't press charges.

Thanks, possible sex offender!

lanyards wrote:This user is setting out to set peoples nerves off, and quite frankly he is being successful.

If he isn't busted for multies, he is baiting.

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:How is saying the community a bad place supporting the mods?

Provide a link to where I said that or close this thread.

Thanks, strife!

I did, there are two of them in my first post, and I will most definitely not close the thread. Oh, did you know that Sexual Solicitation of a Minor is a federal crime? Just thought you should know in case the person you wanted to have sex with is a minor. I bet you didn't know that, it's a shame really. You better hope that the person you sent such explicit messages to isn't a minor and doesn't press charges.

Thanks, possible sex offender!

(1) Neither link in your first post linked to me saying this is a bad community. Keep fishing.

(2) The individual in question is not a minor, I confirmed first based on statements to their age and occupation made in threads, something that the people who scream four-letter words like they're daffodils around here don't do with the many under-16s in these forums.

(3) Incitement to Suicide is also a felony and I have been subject to it during in-game chat and it was ruled acceptable so, again, keep casting that line out there!

Thanks, skiff!

saxitoxin wrote:(1) Yes they do. Keep baiting.

No, they don't. But it doesn't matter. I've already expressed my support for the judicial attitudes of the mods and I know they will review your links and see the words "this is a bad community" or any variation thereof, are not contained in any post by me. *yawners!*

It's actually seventeen to be able to get away with it. Also, you should be aware that you told an eleven year-old to have sexual encounters.

Again, incorrect and potentially libelious.

I never mentioned that, at all. A federal crime isn't always a felony, or vise versa. Keep being the squirmy worm on the hook.

I did.

And incitement to suicide over interstate wire lines is, in fact, a felony under the U.S.C.

saxitoxin wrote:Yes they do. You clearly stated you are not satisfied with us as a community and want it changed.

Mods: Please review the link Strife provided. If you can find no evidence of my making such a statement I would request Strife be sent no holiday due to the extreme disruption levying unfounded complaints can have. If you do find evidence I will happily withdraw my request.


Seventeen is most definitely the legal none liable sexual offense age of which can be committed to. I.E. a seventeen year old may have consensual sex, in some states, usual age even still is eighteen. As in anyone who is sixteen or under and has sex with anyone over eighteen through any means, regardless of consent is against the law(U.S.C). I believe fifteen to seventeen is also possible by sexual consent, but seems to be frowned upon.

I'm not entirely certain what you're talking about at this point. The individual with whom I was interacting is 34, according to him. Mods - I am disturbed by the obvious intent of these accusations. I believe they are grounds for banishment of the user in question. Thank you.

I don't really care, actually. As far as I am concerned your life seem to have little to no meaning. And I hear U.S.C. is a great school, maybe I'll go there for college.

Sounds like a great choice!

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:

Strife wrote:How is saying the community a bad place supporting the mods?

Provide a link to where I said that or close this thread.

Thanks, strife!

I did, there are two of them in my first post, and I will most definitely not close the thread. Oh, did you know that Sexual Solicitation of a Minor is a federal crime? Just thought you should know in case the person you wanted to have sex with is a minor. I bet you didn't know that, it's a shame really. You better hope that the person you sent such explicit messages to isn't a minor and doesn't press charges.

Thanks, possible sex offender!

(1) Neither link in your first post linked to me saying this is a bad community. Keep fishing.

(2) The individual in question is not a minor, I confirmed first based on statements to their age and occupation made in threads, something that the people who scream four-letter words like they're daffodils around here don't do with the many under-16s in these forums.

(3) Incitement to Suicide is also a felony and I have been subject to it during in-game chat and it was ruled acceptable so, again, keep casting that line out there!

Thanks, skiff!

(1) Yes they do. Keep baiting.

(2) It's actually seventeen to be able to get away with it. Also, you should be aware that you told an eleven year-old to have sexual encounters.

(3) I never mentioned that, at all. A federal crime isn't always a felony, or vise versa. Keep being the squirmy worm on the hook.

Strife wrote:
The only intents I carry are those of safety and too keep the, at least, not fully, sullied name of our site as a community. I guess that doesn't concern you.

Thanks!

colton24 wrote:
ok 1.)a minor is under 18 not 16
2.) who is the eleven year old?

saxitoxin wrote:(see lanyards, above) use around minors. I am concerned about the disruption to our community that is made when people file frivolous and fictitious abuse reports such as you have done. I am concerned about the chilling effect on free discussion in our community that occurs when members starting threatening - using an, admittedly, very shaky grasp of the law - litigation and prosecution over comments made in the forums, as you have done, when you disagree with comments in an effort to silence the commenter.

I hope this community can grow with you but I understand sometimes excision of a bad seed is necessary to facilitate growth.

Your implicit accusations of pedophilia are so beyond the pale in sheer outrage that I trust in the absolute jurisprudence of the moderators to address this situation swiftly and efficiently.

I hope you feel better.

Thanks.

the.killing.44 wrote:

saxitoxin wrote:(see lanyards, above) use around minors. I am concerned about the disruption to our community that is made when people file frivolous and fictitious abuse reports such as you have done. I am concerned about the chilling effect on free discussion in our community that occurs when members starting threatening - using an, admittedly, very shaky grasp of the law - litigation and prosecution over comments made in the forums, as you have done, when you disagree with comments in an effort to silence the commenter.

I hope this community can grow with you but I understand sometimes excision of a bad seed is necessary to facilitate growth.

Your implicit accusations of pedophilia are so beyond the pale in sheer outrage that I trust in the absolute jurisprudence of the moderators to address this situation swiftly and efficiently.

I hope you feel better.

Thanks.

a lot of cc players are minors i am 16
FYI lanyards is a minor, and you will find many minors using "foul language" on here.

.44

the.killing.44 wrote:FYI lanyards is a minor, and you will find many minors using "foul language" on here.

.44

lanyards wrote:This user is setting out to set peoples nerves off, and quite frankly he is being successful.
If he isn't busted for multies, he is baiting.

Woodruff wrote:

lanyards wrote:This user is setting out to set peoples nerves off, and quite frankly he is being successful.
If he isn't busted for multies, he is baiting.

If he isn't busted for being a multi, then somebody's sitting in the library every day.