Conquer Club

Accused:

king achilles

The accused are suspected of:

Other: In his quest to be the only jury in this forum king achilles has broken the rules of ConquerClub. Since there is no general rules about the proceedings it is hard to blame anyone of wrongdoing. I.e. the sequrity for the defendant is hurt when the defendant arent allowed to respond to the complaint. But as I said, alas, this cannot be tried.

But the accused have denied a proper "trial" by not admitting an appeal. The rules of CC stated that the members are entitled to one. He has not allowed a proper appeal in the case (to be mention) but made a second ruling himself once again. The CC rule of a second hunter to be allowed to try the case has hence been broken.



Game number(s):
No game but forum: viewtopic.php?f=239&t=89553



Comments:

See above.

LOL

You're brilliant. /sarcasm

Um... you do realise that the other thread resulted in a warning,
not a vacation or any other loss of priviledges and certainly not
the ability to continue making frivolous C&A threads.

juventino wrote:Accused:

king achilles

The accused are suspected of:

Other: In his quest to be the only jury in this forum king achilles has broken the rules of ConquerClub. Since there is no general rules about the proceedings it is hard to blame anyone of wrongdoing. I.e. the sequrity for the defendant is hurt when the defendant arent allowed to respond to the complaint. But as I said, alas, this cannot be tried.

But the accused have denied a proper "trial" by not admitting an appeal. The rules of CC stated that the members are entitled to one. He has not allowed a proper appeal in the case (to be mention) but made a second ruling himself once again. The CC rule of a second hunter to be allowed to try the case has hence been broken.
Game number(s):
No game but forum: viewtopic.php?f=239&t=89553
Comments:

See above.

oVo wrote:Um... you do realise that the other thread resulted in a warning,
not a vacation or any other loss of priviledges and certainly not
the ability to continue making frivolous C&A threads.

I do agree. And furtheron, I do agree that my ratings werent an abuse. But they were ratings based on 1 low - 3 ok - 5 super and i didnt rate them as the other people did. Giving out 5's as a standard. I have learned my lesson from that.
But this is not about my wrongdoing earlier.

I don't agree that five stars is the standard, but two stars is below par
and one star is the worst possible rating available.

But there is a method of appeal, it is called an e-ticket. I think you would get a far better response from a properly filled out e-ticket than you would from this thread.

Palinathas wrote:But there is a method of appeal, it is called an e-ticket. I think you would get a far better response from a properly filled out e-ticket than you would from this thread.

Of course =) And i did but as I said, i only got a respons fron king achilles that the decision had been made and there would be no change,

juventino wrote:

Palinathas wrote:But there is a method of appeal, it is called an e-ticket. I think you would get a far better response from a properly filled out e-ticket than you would from this thread.

Of course =) And i did but as I said, i only got a respons fron king achilles that the decision had been made and there would be no change,

Hahahaha..... Are there some measures taken against those who file complaints like this? WOW.. This guy hasmore time on his hands than I do... sorry 4 him..

Juventino...posting the ratingsabuse thread was a little understandable...but this Is a little stupid...

CC C&A is blowing up now a days with bogus claims on any and everything so everyone can have a chance to vent.

Honestly this is not what this place was intended for, and much more abuse of this system will only hurt you and everyone else. When a hunter gets on and has 30 claims to decipher through and has to give attention to 20 bogus ones "cause if he didn't then someone would *explicative*" then it takes away their time and efforts to focus on the serious cases that will eliminate others from cheating you on this site.

I don't even like to bring up this forum anymore because of all the whining going on about trivial crap.

This is a War Game people, it gets ugly, Deal.

Obviously don't take it too far, their are lines that cant be crossed. Which has become a little grayed as of recently, and I don't even know where they stand. But I am not one involved in the measures of upkeep of this stuff, and juventino, you aren't either. Quit your bellyaching about a decision made about you that would have died along time ago had you not made every effort to keep it lingering around and move on.

I don't concur with every decision that is made by a mod/hunter, and i may vocalize my opinions and expressions in the forum, but bottom line these guys are in this position for a reason and have more facts and levy the options when handing out rulings. And in the past they have openly admitted to having faults and resurrecting them. Its not good form to cry scandal when your appeal doesn't go your way.

And yes I already know your argument is going to be that another hunter should have reviewed your E-ticket. Maybe someone else did and King A for a reason unannounced to you was the lucky one to deliver you the news that "hey *expletive* the ruling stands, move on and have a nice day"

I suggest you do just that.
King Sam

king sam wrote:CC C&A is blowing up now a days with bogus claims on any and everything so everyone can have a chance to vent.

Honestly this is not what this place was intended for, and much more abuse of this system will only hurt you and everyone else. When a hunter gets on and has 30 claims to decipher through and has to give attention to 20 bogus ones "cause if he didn't then someone would *explicative*" then it takes away their time and efforts to focus on the serious cases that will eliminate others from cheating you on this site.

I don't even like to bring up this forum anymore because of all the whining going on about trivial crap.

This is a War Game people, it gets ugly, Deal.

Very well said, and I whole-heartedly concur.

isnt this what i have been saying. there should be a "cried wolf" clause somewhere that will stop this from happening.

juventino, I am sorry that you still feel the way that you do. Feel free to contact another hunter, moderator or an administrator regarding your case against me. Closing this now.

juventino, Please do not consider becoming a lawyer.

possibly the single funniest case i think i have ever seen....

BigBallinStalin wrote:juventino, Please do not consider becoming a lawyer.

to late

king achilles wrote:juventino, I am sorry that you still feel the way that you do. Feel free to contact another hunter, moderator or an administrator regarding your case against me. Closing this now.

nothing personal.... so it wasnt a case against you, only the process. And if i wanted to prove anything here, well, i think it is done now.... (oh, and i know there are alot of cheapjokes)

i did fill the eticket for an appeal. But live and letgo now.

"Mistrial"