Page 1 of 1

rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:01 pm
by djt5483
Accused:

rustler



The accused are suspected of:

leaving unwanted messages in game chat of my games that has is not inolved in



Game number(s):

5167173
5167175
5173587
5173585
5173578
5167171
5167177


Comments:

he lost a game and now he has a hard on for me or somethin because he went into a bunch of my games and left the same message in every one of them...(Rustler: carefull there ________, this baw has found some hack or exploit that allows him to go last in one round and then first in the very next round....taking two turns in a row before you have the chance to go once) is there a way i can get him blocked because if i foe him he can still do this right?

Re: rustler

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:20 pm
by lancehoch
rustler has been sent a PM to stop following you into your games. If this behavior continues, please report it again, either in this thread or if this thread is locked, make a new thread. This is noted.

Re: rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:22 pm
by djt5483
cool, i wasnt sure if that was illegal or not... thanks

Re: rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 10:42 pm
by Rustler
No, I won't follow the little fool into anymore games....it's a sad state of affairs when CC will defend people exploiting cracks in their fallible set of rules instead of the people being hurt by such cheap tactics.

But then again, I guess it shouldn't surprise anybody seeing how that 'tard djt5483 is a paid member and I am not. So the rule we learn here kids...pay the piper and the CC admins will defend you even WHEN you exploit, weeeee!

Re: rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:02 pm
by oVo
djt5483 hurted your feelings and you don't like his tactics? Don't play him any more.
If you can't handle or appreciate the quirks of freestyle? Stick to sequencial games.

Re: rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 11:05 pm
by Woodruff
Rustler wrote:No, I won't follow the little fool into anymore games....it's a sad state of affairs when CC will defend people exploiting cracks in their fallible set of rules instead of the people being hurt by such cheap tactics.
But then again, I guess it shouldn't surprise anybody seeing how that 'tard djt5483 is a paid member and I am not. So the rule we learn here kids...pay the piper and the CC admins will defend you even WHEN you exploit, weeeee!


Trust me, it has absolutely nothing at all to do with his being a paid member and your not. Look around and you can clearly see that. The rule you should learn here is...a rule was not broken. It is an unfortunate but accepted method in freestyle play. If you have a serious problem with it, your best move is to not play freestyle.

Re: rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:18 am
by Rustler
Woodruff wrote:
Trust me, it has absolutely nothing at all to do with his being a paid member and your not. Look around and you can clearly see that. The rule you should learn here is...a rule was not broken. It is an unfortunate but accepted method in freestyle play. If you have a serious problem with it, your best move is to not play freestyle.



I know this is being awfully conspiracy theorist but...come on...a gold member defending other gold members. That one is just too easy....

(at least tell me ya see the humor in that one, or is it that I've stayed awake too long and have crossed the line where EVERYTHING is funny, heh)

Re: rustler [Noted]

PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 12:30 am
by Rustler
oVo wrote:djt5483 hurted your feelings and you don't like his tactics? Don't play him any more.
If you can't handle or appreciate the quirks of freestyle? Stick to sequencial games.




Listen, baw....just because it isn't against the rules...yet...doesn't make it OK. So it's not against the rules, it is STILL an exploit in the purest sense of the word. THEY made the rule where you cannot go first in the new freestyle round if you were the last to go. THEY did that to keep people from going twice in a row...yet some people have found a way around it. The kind of people who are alright with that are the kinds that would add extra armies to their territories in the Risk board game when nobody was looking. Ethically, it is wrong, and I don't give a rats ass who agrees with me or not, that is my opinion.