Conquer Club

Accused:

cholochris
cholomike




The accused are suspected of:

Possible Multi (But more than likely friends)
Possible Secret Alliance also
Other: Extreme foul language



Game number(s):

Game 5027790



Comments: New players according to the ? rank. Can we not put a halt to this before it starts? Only reason I noticed was one of them came into live chat and was pretty rowdy.

Thought I'd help you out there Brucie!

cholochris
cholomike

Game 5027790

show: Chat abuse

Bruceswar wrote:Accused:

cholochris
cholomike




The accused are suspected of:

Possible Multi (But more than likely friends)
Possible Secret Alliance also
Other: Extreme foul language



Game number(s):

Game 5027790



Comments: New players according to the ? rank. Can we not put a halt to this before it starts? Only reason I noticed was one of them came into live chat and was pretty rowdy.

there not multis but obviously did very well in Health class this year

Bruceswar wrote:Comments: New players according to the ? rank. Can we not put a halt to this before it starts? Only reason I noticed was one of them came into live chat and was pretty rowdy.

Im not sure rowdy quite covers these too/one!

If they are multies, they did a nice job of switching up the cap locks and integrating the posts on the game chat. I hope they can be busted though.

Just a couple of newbies, who think they can say anything they want.
infurior will sic 'em

Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

Thanks for the heads up... I just foe them.

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

I agree that they are not multi's with each other, but does not mean they do not have a previous account(s) They did mentioned about taking a long time after setting up a game, as if they knew it was gonna be quick. RTish

Bruceswar wrote:

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

I agree that they are not multi's with each other, but does not mean they do not have a previous account(s) They did mentioned about taking a long time after setting up a game, as if they knew it was gonna be quick. RTish

That might just prove the opposite though, if they had played on the site before they should have known that casual game turns might not be up for a while.

neanderpaul14 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

I agree that they are not multi's with each other, but does not mean they do not have a previous account(s) They did mentioned about taking a long time after setting up a game, as if they knew it was gonna be quick. RTish

That might just prove the opposite though, if they had played on the site before they should have known that casual game turns might not be up for a while.

Good counter point, but it would not hurt to take a quick look.

Bruceswar wrote:

neanderpaul14 wrote:

Bruceswar wrote:

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

I agree that they are not multi's with each other, but does not mean they do not have a previous account(s) They did mentioned about taking a long time after setting up a game, as if they knew it was gonna be quick. RTish

That might just prove the opposite though, if they had played on the site before they should have known that casual game turns might not be up for a while.

Good counter point, but it would not hurt to take a quick look.

Totally agree, but glad you see my point.

Bruceswar wrote:

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

I agree that they are not multi's with each other, but does not mean they do not have a previous account(s) They did mentioned about taking a long time after setting up a game, as if they knew it was gonna be quick. RTish

I guess I should have specified that. They may have previous accounts, but these 2 accounts are not the same person.

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

firefox and ie at the same time
you can also have safari and chrome
meanign you could have a convo with 4 ppl simultaneously

Hmmmm...my opinion is that they are ignorant friends who unknowingly commit secret diplomacy

a.sub wrote:

neanderpaul14 wrote:Some of their comments are within seconds of each other so I don't think they are multis.

firefox and ie at the same time
you can also have safari and chrome
meanign you could have a convo with 4 ppl simultaneously

This is true, but it takes talent to go back and forth with with movements and chatter as frequently as some of it. Either way like it has been said an quick check will resolve the matter. Definitly enough to warrant it.

Good Luck,
KS

Hmm, I took these snapshots to show why my opinion is that these 2 players are the same person. We'll look at their profiles turn % (which is exactly the same) and check out the times they joined and the last log ins:




One has his name in caps and types in caps while the other is opposite and this is supposed to fool people?

both joined/last played within minutes of each other

Something is definently up

apb23 wrote:Something is definently up

yeah sorry ill put it away for now

ya i say there multis

a.sub wrote:

apb23 wrote:Something is definently up

yeah sorry ill put it away for now

Let's note this for now. Game 5027790 is the only game they are in so far and after some people chimed in to the gamechat, these two have not spoken since then and have missed their turns.