Page 1 of 1

Karineke and Geert Romain : Game 4795233[cleared/noted]

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 8:54 am
by kumarboy
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

I accused them at the beginning and now it is very obvious...

I informed them I am reporting them..

I will also reflect this in their ratings when I am eliminated...supposed to be fun!!!!

Be sure before you accuse someone!


Accused:

[Geert Romain ]
[Karineke]




The accused are suspected of:

Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy





Game number(s):

[4795233]




Comments:

Re: Karineke and Geert Romain : Game # 4795233

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 5:56 pm
by apb23
Dude..you have nothing to prove that with. I mean just because YOU were eliminated doesn't mean that a secret diplomacy was involved. I advise you to not make such bold statements...and if you do make sure that you have proof. The odds of them doing this are unlikely, but you are fairly new so you can still learn (don't mean to condescend, just saying that there should be more evidence in a case like this).

Yours Truly,

APB

Re: Karineke and Geert Romain : Game # 4795233

PostPosted: Sat May 16, 2009 12:48 am
by king sam
kumarboy wrote:Accused:
Geert Romain
Karineke

The accused are suspected of:
Being Multis
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number(s):
Game 4795233

Comments:


Filled with links

those 2 are in 9 other games as well together. And both joined in all of them in the #1 & 2 spot. An IP check and look at the game logs will determine the validity of this claim

Good Luck,
KS

Re: Karineke and Geert Romain : Game # 4795233

PostPosted: Wed May 20, 2009 3:05 am
by king achilles
Geert Romain and Karineke are cleared of being multis with one another. Maybe friends or people who know each other. As for a secret diplomacy, it is all you in the game chat and no truce was ever declared. How did you conclude they had a truce? They did not break each other's bonus as you think they are suppose to? If you feel they have a secret alliance in your game, feel free to leave the appropriate ratings for these players. For now, this is noted.