Page 1 of 1

Vermont and petewins1368 [noted]

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 7:38 am
by Teflon Kris
<DELETE ME>
PLACE THE NAME OF THE ACCUSED IN THE SUBJECT LINE!!!

Replace or delete any xxxxxxx with the appropriate information.
Delete any accusations or entries which do not apply.

Be sure before you accuse someone!
</DELETE ME>

Accused:

Vermont
petewins1368

The accused are suspected of:

Conducting Secret Diplomacy or similar (e.g. win-sharing pre-agreement)

Game number(s):

Game 4891132

Comments: Blatant killing of team-mates target in an assassin game. After failing to attack his team-mate, Vermont enabled his team-mate (petewins1368) to profit from bonuses. When this didn't quite produced the desired victory, Vermont decided, to cash in and finish the job for his team-mate himself. Normally, a cheat would make a token gesture to make it appear he was trying to eliminate his target. Not this time!

The excuses provided are pathetic. Well, check it out, there are no excuses possible:

Re: Vermont and petewins1368

PostPosted: Fri May 15, 2009 7:44 am
by Vermont
I don't normally play assassin games (in fact, that was the first since I've come back to cc after being gone for many months.) I was just trying to get the territory at the top (which I was trying to do from the beginning, if you notice.)

I don't think I've even played with that other person before, either, and I certainly don't know him. I already admitted in chat in the game you followed me too that it was a poor play. What more do you want?

Re: Vermont and petewins1368

PostPosted: Tue May 19, 2009 1:32 am
by king achilles
In game 4891132, from round 1 - round 4, Vermont was attacking petewins1368 as this looks like his target. Only from round 5 and 6 that he attacked red which eliminated this player and handed the game to petewins1368. You may believe his reasoning for what happened in your game or not. Speed Assassin fog-of-war games are prone to unexpected endings.

So far, 2 games played together by these two players and both are speed games, and in this game, it also happens to be a fog-of-war type, which can also 'blind' one's view on how much troops you still have. I can only note this for the time being. If you think blue and green had planned this all along, or if blue gave this win to green, then give him/them the appropriate ratings for it. We would need more than 1 suspicious game to warrant a block for them.