mkknyr, superxchloe [Cleared]

[mr_green_SAFS]

Accused:
mkknyr
superxchloe

The accused are suspected of:
Conducting Secret Diplomacy

Game number:
Game 4817210

Comments:
Game Chat
2009-05-05 00:54:28 - mkknyr: green, we have to try and break red together.
2009-05-05 03:24:57 - superxchloe: i'm in.
2009-05-05 03:58:44 - mkknyr: well done.


Is this legal?

[Hsur]

Posted from the rules section:

Rule #2: No secret diplomacy
Any form of diplomatic discussion between opponents must be posted in the game chat in English or in a language that all opponents understand. Diplomacy includes, but is not limited to: proposing truces, negotiating alliances, and coordinating assaults. Secret diplomacy can be hard to prove, but if you suspect it you should leave the players in question appropriate ratings. If you feel certain about players engaging in secret diplomacy consider reporting them in the Cheating & Abuse Reports forum by posting a new topic.

My suggestion to you would be to ask the other player (yellow) in game chat for an alliance also. That way it's two against two.

[king sam]

you were getting 13 troops at the time they coordinated together to bring you down. Everyone else was getting 3 except green who was getting 5.

This happens when one player stands out as the leader as you did from early on, best bet would to be to draw as little attention as possible from here on out or offer yellow a truce seeing as those 2 know own half the board

good luck

[lancehoch]

mkknyr and superxchloe are Cleared of secret diplomacy. As it seems that you were ahead in the game at the time and the announcement was made in the game chat for all to see, there does not seem to be any secret collusion involved in this case.