Conquer Club

Accused: Gustaf Wasa

The accused are suspected of:

Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

4712525

Comments: First he accuses us of cheating in a triples games because we play (wife, husband, brother) from the same home. Now he leaves one star feedback for everything (noting his team mates left 5 stars). Losing 3 out of 4 games with us may not be the ideal outcome in his eyes but they were all good, fun games played honestly and with integrity. His ratings do not reflect anything but his unhappiness in losing. Bad little boy!

2009-04-21 06:00:15 - mmub: gla
2009-04-22 22:42:30 - Gustaf Wasa: Good luck!
2009-04-25 21:49:23 - monte485: gg crash
2009-04-27 01:31:46 - alstergren: gg guys, well played
2009-04-27 01:39:13 - monte485: gg 2 u 2
2009-04-27 02:03:19 - mazeman: gg gustav
2009-04-27 03:55:32 - mazeman: gga

In this post you say he's your brother but then on your wall you say he is your brother-in-law??



It must suck living with your brother/brother-in-law, how do you cope with it?

Not to flaunt my Master's degree in English, that was a 3rd person statement ie. a wife, a husband, a brother. As for 3 adults living in a 4100 sq. ft. home (roughly the size of Sweden I might add), it is not a difficult life.

How is talking in third person a sign of having a masters degree?


Also, it is great to know you live in a house the size of Sweden although this is clearly more lies.

Mods, bust this motherfucker

Good catch Gustaf!

nagerous wrote:How is talking in third person a sign of having a masters degree?


Also, it is great to know you live in a house the size of Sweden although this is clearly more lies.

Mods, bust this motherfucker

Good catch Gustaf!

Uh...Gustaf is the one being accused. Not "this...guy" (who was the originator of the thread).

I figured spock.

nagerous wrote:I figured spock.

It really doesn't appear that way, since you congratulated Gustaf on the bust.

Woodruff wrote:

nagerous wrote:I figured spock.

It really doesn't appear that way, since you congratulated Gustaf on the bust.

Gustaf reported the 3 here. that's what nag is referring to i think.

.44

the.killing.44 wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

nagerous wrote:I figured spock.

It really doesn't appear that way, since you congratulated Gustaf on the bust.

Gustaf reported the 3 here. that's what nag is referring to i think.
.44

Ah, I see! Thanks...I was really confused by that. Of course, nobody was busted in that thread, so...

mmub wrote:Accused: Gustaf Wasa

The accused are suspected of:

Ratings Abuse

Game number(s):

4712525

Comments: First he accuses us of cheating in a triples games because we play (wife, husband, brother) from the same home. Now he leaves one star feedback for everything (noting his team mates left 5 stars). Losing 3 out of 4 games with us may not be the ideal outcome in his eyes but they were all good, fun games played honestly and with integrity. His ratings do not reflect anything but his unhappiness in losing. Bad little boy!

2009-04-21 06:00:15 - mmub: gla
2009-04-22 22:42:30 - Gustaf Wasa: Good luck!
2009-04-25 21:49:23 - monte485: gg crash
2009-04-27 01:31:46 - alstergren: gg guys, well played
2009-04-27 01:39:13 - monte485: gg 2 u 2
2009-04-27 02:03:19 - mazeman: gg gustav
2009-04-27 03:55:32 - mazeman: gga

Well. I see you handed down a very unnice rating to GW yourself. So, just suck it up cupcake and stop whining.

I gave him 5 stars for game play and fair play. I gave him 1 star for attitude .. Not exactly "unnice" (better check your grammar). It is easy to validate the truth, Gustaf's bogus rating and accusations were based on him losing, nothing more - nothing less. Too bad honesty and integrity are not as prevalent on CC as immaturity and lack of values seems to be.

Get over it, you're lucky the mods haven't blocked you guys - especially since your prior slip up, which wasn't a slip up because you learnt about talking in third person during your english masters. In prior cases like Jeff Hardy and Matt Hardy, a block was put in place, when they are clearly different people.

Sorry, if I'm appearing like I'm coming on strong here, but your cheating+abuse thread against Gustaf is unwarranted.

No one accused him of cheating, he accused us of cheating -- then he abused the rating system. All three are facts. Three people in the same house playing triples (you will not find us EVER having played any singles games together) is not cheating, CC even spells that out in the the rules. "Sucking it up" is what Gustaf should have done, along with apologizing for being wrong. Like I said before, honestly and integrity is not as prevalent as it could be here. Too many people hide behind the internet to say and do things they wouldn't do in person.

mmub wrote:No one accused him of cheating, he accused us of cheating -- then he abused the rating system.

Abusing the rating system is as follows:
only leavin poor ratings or at least more often then not because of

• vindication
• poor sportsmanship
• spite
• other than just causes

It appears to me his ratings that he leaves are more often then not average to above average for most users, and in this case he rated you 3 as he saw fit. Which is what he is entitled to do. Their is no abuse of the rating system in my eyes, and if is deemed as such by the mods then they will impose a Warning for him not to do such on a continuing basis.

As for the claim on these 3 being multis, there is a thread made for that, and all comments should go there. The mods are aware and able to detect foul play from users who use the same IP.

Good Luck,
KS

nagerous wrote:Get over it, you're lucky the mods haven't blocked you guys - especially since your prior slip up, which wasn't a slip up because you learnt about talking in third person during your english masters. In prior cases like Jeff Hardy and Matt Hardy, a block was put in place, when they are clearly different people.

Is there a reason you keep trolling this thread with comments that belong in a different C&A thread?

Woodruff wrote:

nagerous wrote:Get over it, you're lucky the mods haven't blocked you guys - especially since your prior slip up, which wasn't a slip up because you learnt about talking in third person during your english masters. In prior cases like Jeff Hardy and Matt Hardy, a block was put in place, when they are clearly different people.

Is there a reason you keep trolling this thread with comments that belong in a different C&A thread?

Is there a reason why you are trolling me, rather than making comments regarding the C&A thread?
I especially like the way you quoted me, cutting off my final comment, which featured an apology and implied that I had said everything I was going to say as well - expert trolling there, give yourself a

What I said was relevant as it is to do with the case in hand and is evidence as to why Gustaf may have given those certain ratings. The other thread is closed and considering it is the same people I am talking about, my comments are best suited here.

nagerous wrote:

Woodruff wrote:

nagerous wrote:Get over it, you're lucky the mods haven't blocked you guys - especially since your prior slip up, which wasn't a slip up because you learnt about talking in third person during your english masters. In prior cases like Jeff Hardy and Matt Hardy, a block was put in place, when they are clearly different people.

Is there a reason you keep trolling this thread with comments that belong in a different C&A thread?

Is there a reason why you are trolling me, rather than making comments regarding the C&A thread?
I especially like the way you quoted me, cutting off my final comment, which featured an apology and implied that I had said everything I was going to say as well - expert trolling there, give yourself a

I cut off the last statement because it was irrelevant to your "statement of fact" that those three are clearly different people, when that CLEARLY was not the case nor "a fact".

nagerous wrote:What I said was relevant as it is to do with the case in hand and is evidence as to why Gustaf may have given those certain ratings. The other thread is closed and considering it is the same people I am talking about, my comments are best suited here.

The other thread was closed with the individuals found NOTED (which certainly is not BUSTED). That should be "enough said" for you, quite honestly. You're simply polluting THIS thread in an effort to get THAT thread re-opened or something, because it is NOT relevant to THIS thread.

I already said everything I wanted to say...

Now, quit trolling me and welcome to my foes, hope you find it a pleasant area.

nagerous wrote:I already said everything I wanted to say...

Now, quit trolling me and welcome to my foes, hope you find it a pleasant area.

You made a post to say that you have already said everything you wanted to say? Seriously?

As to your foe's list, that really doesn't bother me in the slightest. I'm sure it's a nice place.

i've played against gustaf many times and always found him gracious in victory and defeat

mmub wrote:Accused: Gustaf Wasa

The accused are suspected of:

Ratings Abuse

Dude, you are one of those who it seems shouldn't be playing in this website, you can't handle it. First you have three accounts from the same IP - and get away with it by saying it is three people in the same household, good job on that one by the way. Then, everything I see of you is continued poor sportsmanship.

I've played against Gustaf before and had no problems with him.

People are entitled to rate people as they see fit. If he constantly gave people bad ratings for no reason that would be another matter.

If you believe you received a poor rating undeservedly then that is what the respond link is for in your ratings page.

Being as the report he presented before could not convince him that you guys are not multi accounts, he gave you the corresponding ratings that he saw fit. This is his personal opinion based on what he saw from a game that you had together and we do not want to second guess them. Maybe, after some time, you guys can settle this between yourselves. For now, this is noted.