Bruceswar wrote:Anybody who plays lots of 1 vs 1 games will tell you to win 80% of the time is impossible for anybody when playing SEQ.
OP only complained about 75%, and 80% is certainly attainable. Observe many players' Waterloo matches. It wouldn't be attainable if everyone played perfectly, but they don't. You can always massacre public players, but usually people who care enough about playing fairly (and hence playing sequential) don't bother with that. Leave the farming to the "conqueror".
prismsaber wrote:It's 1v1, which is completely luck based. I've swept strong opponents before in 1v1 and also lost 6 of 7 to a striper before. Doesn't mean squat.
No game is completely luck based - even those St. Pat's games.
2 player games are the best measure for an individual player. Good players play for slight advantages which add up to a higher percentage of winning. You can't be assured of a win, but the wins or losses are yours alone, rather than the escalating games where you happen to play after a hanging, or the flat rate games where you're the last one not to deadbeat, or the freestyle team games where you jump another team before they can take a turn. When you lose after playing first, you lose because you lost, not because of anyone else's mistakes.